Family members trashing each other and disowning each other over politics is Soviet-coded and depressing and isn’t the kind of thing that healthy societies participate in or encourage.

Commentators like this Andy Williams fellow, whom we can take to be representative of the liberal mainstream, have an utterly distorted view of how mass migration plays out over time. Over the past 25 years, France has admitted more than 3 million migrants, mostly from Africa and the Mideast. You cannot add that many unassimilated, unacculturated migrants to a nation in that amount of time and not expect massive civil unrest, which is what is unfolding now. Williams says the Palestinian flags are because the riots are “far left,” as if leftist politics and migration from the third world are two different things. They’re not. Leftism is the political ideology most third worlders adopt upon arrival in the west. In general, one must aggressively ignore basic demographic dynamics and cultural realities to assert that there is no connection between mass migration and the social unrest in France, which is now spreading to other countries. If this were really about poor classroom conditions, why are migrant youths rioting and looting in Belgium, Milan, and elsewhere? Enough of this nonsense. Let’s just be honest about what’s happening.

Spam call centers should be bombed and spam call center executives should be Nuremburged. Allowing the third world access to the Internet was a colossal mistake.

The @washingtonpost recently published an op-ed by Ronald Shafer (@ronald_sha57306) on President Trump’s Triumphal Arch that was extremely dishonest and filled with outright falsehoods. Shafer falsely claims that building the Arch on Memorial Circle is inconsistent with the 1902 McMillan Plan, which laid out a comprehensive plan for Washington DC. Shafer fails to mention the 1925 law ENACTED by Congress that specifically incorporated the Arlington Memorial Bridge Commission’s 1924 plan. This plan provided for a colossal project including a new Memorial Bridge and a monumental plaza on Columbia Island, including two MASSIVE 166-foot-tall columns that would provide a fittingly monumental approach to Arlington National Cemetery. The 1925 law expressly allowed for the Commission to make changes to the plan as the Commission deemed necessary. The two columns were not built because of the economy and an airfield (Hoover Field) that was too close to the columns. When the Arlington Memorial Bridge Commission exercised its discretion in 1932 to replace the columns with fountains, Charles Moore, Chairman of the Commission on Fine Arts, which also had jurisdiction on this project, complained that this area (now Memorial Circle) should “be treated in monumental fashion” as called for in the congressionally authorized 1924 Plan. Ultimately, because of the Depression, this portion of the Arlington Bridge Commission Plan was never completed, and the empty Memorial Traffic Circle built in 1940 does not complete the grand design authorized and envisioned by the Arlington Memorial Bridge Commission and by Congress as enacted in the 1925 law. It is a disgrace to our nation and her noble veterans. Moreover, the McMillan Plan envisioned having the Memorial Bridge cross to Analostan Island (now Theodore Roosevelt Island). Columbia Island, a product of an immense dredging effort and where Memorial Circle is today, had not been developed yet. But the McMillan plan, citing President McKinley, expressly recognized the longstanding desire for a project in this area linking North and South as a “monument to American valor” and called for a “concourse suitable for memorial treatment on Analostan Island.” The Arlington Memorial Bridge Commission’s plan is completely consistent with the McMillan Plan, with its columns linking North and South and providing a suitably monumental entrance to Arlington National Cemetery. Despite these facts and history, Shafer claims that the McMillan Plan rejected the “central ornamental towers” on the bridge. But that quote was made with respect to proposals for towers in the MIDDLE of the bridge, much closer to the Lincoln Memorial and which would not be “desirable features for the central portion of a BRIDGE structure.” Shafer’s second quote is even more dishonest, portraying the McMillan Plan’s sentence that the “noble slopes toward the river should be rigorously protected against the invasion of monuments” as a rejection of any plans to build an arch on Columbia Island. In fact, that sentence is speaking to curtailing the building of large monuments ON THE GROUNDS of Arlington National Cemetery, in particular the elevated slopes within the cemetery. This quote has NOTHING to do with Columbia Island, which did not even exist at the time in its present state and which is almost half a mile away from the entrance of the Cemetery. As noted above, what the McMillan Commission Plan says about the ENTRANCE to the cemetery is that it should be a “concourse suitable for memorial treatment.” Shafer’s dishonesty is evident when he writes that President Harding announced in 1922 plans to build a bridge and skips to President Hoover walking across it in 1932. Shafer entirely left out the creation of the Arlington Memorial Bridge Commission, which developed a plan that specifically provided for two 166-foot columns where Memorial Circle is, and that its plan was enacted into law in 1925, including discretion to make design changes. Shame on the Washington Post for publishing Ronald Shafer’s dishonest and misleading piece. The Washington Post's and Shafer's TDS is on full display. I laid out all these details and more in my @FDRLST piece on how President Trump’s Arch is authorized by the 1925 law.

.@MegynKelly on Elissa Slotkin: "She's EVIL and disgusting... These people believed it, they voted Democrat, and now she's threatening to put their children in jail if they decide to go work for Trump..." FULL show with @RuthlessPodcast: piped.video/f9ISAQj-T9c?si=97x1…

“I said an authoritarian and weaponized thing like a total thug and I’ve been crying about it and you all owe me an apology for calling me out on it because I’m the victim here”

This came in the mail today. It’s addressed to my kids and has resources for them to be emancipated and go out of state to have surgery. I’m going to vote tomorrow…

Weird that the only woman you never see in one of his greasy ads is his own wife. Why’s he hiding her

The only people calling you about Albania and Europe are your corrupt CIA handlers.

Impossible to parody. This is the same clown who tried to get NLRB to shut down The Federalist over a joke about unions.

David French is not a Christian. He is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. See my attached article about him.

It shouldn’t be controversial to put traitors like Elissa Slotkin in prison.

If you show this to the Leftist in your life who fancies themself a clever “technocrat,” it will not make a bit of difference. Because it’s not about “the numbers” or “abundance.” It’s about jealousy, resentment, and the animalistic joy of destruction. This makes them happy.

Never once was it even connected to reality what this anti-Trump lunatic neocon says on Trump's diesel deal - why not help farmers/truckers? Neocon warmongers like this never actually want to have actual conversations, all they do is scream

Hearing reports from door knockers in Texas that every Talarico house looks a lot like this. Can anyone confirm?

They don’t commit acts of violence against you because you’re a Nazi. They call you a Nazi so that they can commit acts of violence against you. Pray for my TPUSA lecture at ISU tomorrow. I’ll be giving a lecture on how Jesus Loves Mass Deportations.

In the end, they’re all just thieves.

The fate of Texas and America is at stake. Vote for @KenPaxtonTX today.