Sending stablecoins is simple Accepting them as a payment method is another challenge That’s why @Shopify and @Coinbase built the Commerce Payments Protocol on Base ↓

Congrats on @toady_hawk as the newly appointed CEO of @clanker_world as Clank Executive Officer. Anecdotally, he bought base:0x1bc0c42215582d5a085795f4badbac3ff36d1bcb within 2 mins of its launch. He’s one of the most Based OG in @base eco. Very excited to see what’s cooking under his new leadership! Sky is the limit for @clanker_world and @base

this is jerry pan aka @stambouli_o1 ceo of o1.exchange a base builder that has recently gotten a lot of support from base itself and co I didn‘t wanna make this post at first, I thought he‘s a genuine guy building on base, but I found out he‘s a shady dude and I wanna call him out and warn people before he benefits more from it I‘m tired of seeing such shady people getting support while good builders are left behind jerry was at the university of california, berkeley since oct 2014 he is at o1.exchange if you never heard of the platform: - $BLUECHIP is a coin from o1 listen on coinbase - $BASECAT is an o1 coin listed on coinbase too they have tokenized stock models before o1 he also has worked for: - Iris/Datairis - @databricks (Engineer) - @UCBerkeley (Engineering) - @X (technical clerk) - @spreadxai - o1ventures I found out he‘s been part of a project called $digimon on solana (Digimon Engine) it started in january 2025 and included AI-Agents and Multiplayer Games The GitHub name Cohuman is interesting, because jerry is also known as the CRO of Cohuman Labs So there is a connection between him and Digimon The token sustained 3 months and then lost 100% if it‘s value, there were no activities around the website/token within 3 months and lots of people lost their money token still has around 5k holders (people who sold earlier in a loss are not included in this number) he later deleted his X too (see screenshots of old acc) let‘s come to another thing: the $O1 airdrop when o1 airdrop occured, many fresh wallets without transaction history have received masses of tokens he claimed that one o1 user could‘ve had multiple wallets and thats where it comes from, later blamed it on RPC issues after my own experience with him, I briefly think this is larp when $BASECAT launched, it barely got any support on it‘s first dip, me and few others bullposted and shared it around before it got attention and later pumped to multi millions most initial investors were not team members of o1 then base announced their goal with tokenized stocks and jerry jumped to a token called $BLUECHIP made a group of investors and tried to make it the no1 runner during that time he often dmd kols (me included) and asked for social engagement support I wanted to jump in at first, but I realized that it was just to advertise more around his product he only offered kols a voting of the launchpad fees and thats it a cto lead of $BLUECHIP later told me that dev has made $150k of the fees and that jerry declined to support them alot with fees generated cto team on his exchange got 0 fees and he didnt take care of applying a fee receiver swap that tells a lot btw when I asked him privately for endorsement on $BASECAT which during that time had support of base and @theunipcs he told me „let‘s focus on bluechip“ later bluechip got listed, most investors that pushed it were ex coinbase people + o1 team pure insider job, and thats why the chart looks worse than basecat btw another weird thing is that he is botting his own posts at @stambouli_o1 😂😂 you can clearly see in screenshots below that it‘s not natural engagement I‘m genuinely surprised that a guy like this has gotten a lot of support from base this guy is obviously not here for good intentions one interesting aspect too: the $BRIAN token which was one of the biggest dumps in base history chartwise was also launched on o1 exchange I know that most of the sellers came from brian changing back his profile picture but jerry publicly called for „recovery“ and publicly gave the token a shoutout pumped his own coins and bags not the way a founder behaves, this is suspicious af avoid this guy by all means, he‘s shady and any token from his launchpad he actively pushes is driven by insiders

We’ve heard the community’s concerns about the $O airdrop, including inactive recipient wallets and batch claims. We appreciate people taking a closer look and want to share some context. @o1_exchange supports multiple wallets per account, so one recipient wallet’s history may not reflect a user’s overall activity. Claims were processed automatically across eligible wallets, meaning secondary wallets could receive $O without users opening or manually claiming from them. An RPC outage caused by rate limits also delayed claims on airdrop day. Pending claims were backfilled afterward, contributing to the batch patterns seen onchain. The airdrop was designed to recognize long-term participation. Some of our power users supported o1 before our product launched and are still with us today. Their continued support means a lot to us. What recipients do with their $O is their choice. Our focus is on continuing to build useful features and reward programs across the Trading Terminal and Launchpad, with our long-term supporters in mind. Staking, which we hinted at before the TGE, is now live: docs.o1.exchange/staking/int… Thank you for believing in @o1_exchange and holding us accountable. We’ll keep working to earn your support.