Home Depot — like most other 1000x+ investments over time — required you to hold through massive drawdowns.
Yes it would be nice to have turned $10,000 into $17 million. But you would had to hold the stock for years through three separate 65%+ drawdowns from its all-time high.
This property of extreme drawdowns is common among stocks with the highest total long-term return.
- Amazon was down 93% in the early 2000s
- Costco fell 70% from 1992-1995
- Starbucks fell ~50% three times: 1998, 1999, and 2008
Paradoxically, if you want to benefit from the greatest single-returning stocks over time, you have to have an investing disposition that lets you hold through massive multi-year drawdowns.
@APNavaratnam has been beating this drum for years and he published some great data on it: worldlypartners.com/the-path…
If you bought Home Depot's shares at IPO, you'd own a greater percent of the company today than you did 45 years ago.
Even with all the stock they issued to fund growth, they've now bought back enough stock to counteract it.