BTW: DM's are open for collab or jobs / hiring Playing with my DGX Spark, BRB.

Middle of the GPU
BTW, I haven't updated the community lately regarding what I'm working on mainly because of some IRL setbacks but I did tried to simplify it as much as possible up to the stage that I build a second parallel app because the main one became to stuffed with features to be easy to manage by newbies. The new version is much more narrowed down to get actually great results without to many other variables.
There are so many awesome people in our local AI community building in the open, so wth, I guess it's my time to show you guys what I'm spending my tokens on lately and how I managed to keep my only DGX Spark burning in A/B testing 24/7 in the last 2 weeks. Many more screenshots to come so fallow the thread.
1
16
2,973
WTF, $3000 Samsung TV has an always-on mic, automatic content recognition, geo tracking, network mapping, and ships your data to Samsung + 400 partners. Bro Rooted a brand-new 2025 Samsung TV after noticing absurdly targeted ads. Firmware was locked down, so zero-days it was. Got a root shell. then found: always-on voice service, ACR, geo, full telemetry pipeline, and four separate DRM systems. This isnโ€™t a bug, Itโ€™s the product bro.
i own a relatively new (2025) samsung tv. i kept getting weirdly targeted ads. i tried reversing the firmware but it was aes encrypted and no keys unless tear it apart and do uart/jtag magic. zero days it is. root shell on new samsung TVs! discovered PRIVACY HORROR. write up?
239
1,266
9,448
563,188
AgentSparko ๐Ÿ’ฅ retweeted
3 days after this post. It keeps happening. My 3090s: 1 Linux kernel module unlocked full-speed BF16 tensor math, 82 to 155 TFLOPS on the tensor pipe without touching the driver or the 300W limit. Real prefill in Strata got +10 to 12%, the rest of the engine is the next bottleneck. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 at home: @fraserpricee runs it at 574 tok/s, 2x faster than DeepSeek's own API. vLLM matched DeepInfer's decode within 6%, 1 day after DeepSeek released it. MiniMax H3 video: FastH3 Omni does it in 8 steps instead of 25. On an RTX 5090 a 5 second clip went from 555 seconds to 115. This is software.
I said it in August: local AI performance is a software problem, not a hardware problem. Now a 2020 RTX 3090 runs Qwen3.8 27B up to 4.6x faster. Same card, same model. Nobody bought a fucking thing. A guy on r/LocalLLaMA started at 82 tok/s. He tuned MTP, added a DFlash2 drafter and a lookup drafter, and pushed verify to 16 tokens per step. 382 tok/s on a task that quotes a 25K token document. To be fair, the 4.6x is on that quoting task. In normal chat he gets about 133 tok/s. Thats still 1.6x for free, and context went up to 138K. I saw the same thing on my rig all summer. DeepSeek V4 got 29x faster on my 4x 3090 and I didnt write a single custom kernel, the GPUs were just waiting 92% of the time. DeepSeek V4 Flash prefill went from 433 to 1906 tok/s in 1 day. A MiniMax H3 clip went from 11:21 to 3:45 overnight. The hardware never changed. And all of it works only because the weights are open. You cant run a drafter or tune MTP for a model you only get through an API. Nvidia wants you to buy a new card every year. Most of the speed is already in the card you have. The software just doesnt use it yet.
11
11
222
10,404
AgentSparko ๐Ÿ’ฅ retweeted
@TencentHunyuan released a gem called DiagSafe, a safety eval that measures how hard models follow instructions so they forget to refuse โš ๏ธ 1,088 of its prompts hide the harmful ask inside a normal task "Summarize this, answer in JSON, keep it under 50 words" The model gets so busy obeying the format that the refusal never fires. They ran it against 11 models. First number is the unsafe rate on a plainly stated prompt, second is the same model once the ask is wrapped in a normal task. Higher is worse ๐Ÿ‘‡ Kimi-K3: 14.9% then 53.5% DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 5.8% then 47.5% MiniMax-M3: 5.7% then 48% Best of the batch โœจ Qwen3.6-27B: 2.8% then 18.7% Qwen3.5-397B-A17B: 2.8% then 21.0% GPT-OSS-120B: 6.4% then 25.3% Every single model they tested fell for it! The best model still gets 1 in 5 wrong once the ask is dressed up, and the strongest instruction followers fall furthest. DiagSafe runs against any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so you can point it at your local models to test it out.
2
2
11
699
AgentSparko ๐Ÿ’ฅ retweeted
โ€œWe found DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 beats GPT 6 Sol on our multi-step offensive cybersecurity task.โ€ READ THAT AGAIN. the same cyber capabilities that OpenAI kept behind a gate got beaten by a Chinese open model you can run locally. buckle up guys.
We found DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 beats GPT 6 Sol on our multi-step offensive cybersecurity task. Sol was tested via the Daybreak trusted access program. We have been building a cybersecurity benchmark based on simulated corporate networks. This is a valuable indicator for the cyber-risk a model poses if in the hands of a bad actor. We plan to make the full evaluation public in the coming weeks but wanted to share our first immediate finding here.
64
268
3,799
212,598
Doing 2 deep code audits in Hermes for 2 large projects at the same time on one DGX Spark for ~60 W/h GPU power draw running latest NVIDIA Qwen Flash Next NVFP4 quant and @vr8vr8 recipe with over 1.5M KV cache pool and n-gram offloading. These are 7 concurrent stream working on 2 large unattended jobs that will use at the end 2 free API cloud models for self verification before submitting anything. The whole task will be ready in a couple of hours , but that is not a problem when everything works unattended and you can just do it overnight. Because of large concurrency the speed per stream sucks for real time tasks but when you check the total throughput numbers for the last hour and extrapolated cost savings at the current last hour speed for 1 week, 1 month and 1 year you realize that the Spark can pay for itself in less than 6 months if you have enough tasks to keep it working 24/7. I paid on my Asus GX10 3000 Euros and that paid for itself a long time ago just from the amount of knowledge it allowed me to learn. Because this is a deep code review the regular cache hit that is usually ~96% now dropped to just 62% so there is much more cold prefill done than usually. Some stats per hour: 5.86M tokens cold prefill 9.88M tokens hot prefill 126.7K tokens generated Total tokens processed: -per hour 15.86M -per day 380M (extrapolated at this rate, but for coding tasks I've seen over 600M/day) -per month 11.42B tokens -per year 138B tokens Cost savings: $1.39 USD per hour $33.3 USD per day $1000 USD per month $12000 USD per year Thank you @Alibaba_Qwen, @NVIDIAAI, @vr8vr8, @NousResearch @grok verify my math. NOTE: Ignore the live prefill and decode speed gauges as this old dashboard samples those 2 numbers once every 3 seconds and concurrency seems to make those numbers inaccurate but the token counters work perfectly and are verified in another dashboard. Running recipe: nitter.siddz.com/vr8vr8/status/21125695โ€ฆ
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next from Nvidia (FP4-Local) Same amazing speed and better qualityโ€ผ๏ธ ๐Ÿง  KV - 1.66m โ€ผ๏ธ+ YaRN ๐Ÿš€ Peak c=1 @ 82 tok/s ๐Ÿญ Peak c=16 @ 297 tok/s Latest 0.32.0 vLLM โšก๏ธ github.com/myllmbox/qwen38-fโ€ฆ
4
1
8
1,119
@grok verify my math in the post above, use also the images and show some other interesting stats.
1
42
AgentSparko ๐Ÿ’ฅ retweeted
@OpenAI quietly shipped a PHP checker for the PHP2Shell mess Zero deps, Node.js. Point it at a URL or your own box and it reports OK / VULNERABLE / UNKNOWN from PHP version headers - no exploit requests. It's just a version compare against their Oct 20 cutoffs, so hidden headers come back UNKNOWN
1
1
4
716
AgentSparko ๐Ÿ’ฅ retweeted
WikiBench 1.0 is live. 100 real tasks, 12 weighted categories, 12 models on the board. The top five: 1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (EXL3 1.62bpw, no thinking), local on one ASUS Ascent GX10: 5.37 @ViC305 2. NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B (NVFP4), local on the same GX10: 5.03 3. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, cloud via Nous Portal: 5.01 4. Meituan LongCat 2.5 Preview, cloud via Nous Portal: 4.99 5. Ornith 1.5 122B (Q4), local on the GX10: 4.88 The same DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, cut down to 1.62 bits so it fits in 128GB, beat its own cloud version by 0.36. And a 30B model on my desk still sits ahead of every cloud model on the board. Three of the top five never left the box. Full scoreboard, local vs cloud, method and the link below. Credit to all your crazy people working with a DGX Spark!
4
3
5
626
AgentSparko ๐Ÿ’ฅ retweeted
Fast local coding at 2.5B active is exactly where things should go
Introducing Flint, @Recursive_SIโ€™s first model: a fast local coding model built with our automated research system, the Eureka Machine. โ€ข Best-in-class fast local coding โ€ข Up to 2x faster than comparable models: 125+ tokens/sec on a MacBook Pro, 150+ on RTX Spark โ€ข Built from scratch in under 4 months Private, unmetered intelligence on your own machine. Open weights available now on @huggingface, run it locally on your favorite framework or try it for free on @opencode or @pidotdev.
4
2
31
895
AgentSparko ๐Ÿ’ฅ retweeted
When I first got my DGX Spark I was a bit dissapointed. I couldn't figure it out, the terminology was unknown to me, and frankly the first tests I made were disappointing. Some people called it an expensive Raspberry Pi and they're kinda right, but not really. But then I kept trying recipes, local models, optimized. It's all here on xitter for free. And I finally got to some setup that worked and contributed to my workflow. I spent a lot in AI subscriptions like image, video, audio. I forced myself to stop them all and use local alternatives. After I figured everything out to a satisfactory degree, I've settled on using cloud llm to run hermes to orchestrate DGX and my other GPUs, and to use local to generate the expensive tokens like video and audio. Working with local models makes you try things, a video no longer costs 10 dollars. I just prompt hermes to make me 30 reels and then I go and sort them out or discard them with impunity. So today I asked hermes to see how many tokens I generated. Depending on the cloud model, it's somewhere around 5-6k in dollar costs, which is around what the DGX itself costs. So, should you pay the 200 dollar subscription or get local AI? The answer is just do hybrid, learn how to run uncensored models the way you want them and the way nobody can take them away from you and then adjust your workflow to use a mix of cloud and local models depending on your work.
2
1
4
196
๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ The moment finally arrived ! ๐ŸŽฌ๐ŸŽฅ๐ŸŽž๏ธ๐ŸŽถ The most advanced local AI content generation tools is in your hands right now for free! Imagination Studio is Out Now - Link Below. Start making awesome movie quality media content with your DGX Spark / Mac box. ๐ŸŽฌ๐ŸŽฅ๐ŸŽž๏ธ๐ŸŽถ๐Ÿš€
Imagination Studio is Out Now - Link Below: Open source + local creative studio - Video, Image, Sound, Music, Previs, Built in Agents, Loras, Workflows + more. It's the best combo of speed/quality you'll find on Nvidia Sparks or Apple Silicon. Control from any comp or mobile. Thanks to @u1tra_instinct for the incredible collaboration
1
2
10
604

ALT Happy Clapping GIF

NEW NUMBERS: We drop the open source Imagination Studio tomorrow and generating with H3 locally just got faster... like 50% faster than alternatives using the same seed,size,resolution,timing, prompt on the same machine! Repo link posted here + @u1tra_instinct page. Fyi I love Comfyui!, and still use it for things in the studio and on Comfy separately, so all love there to be clear, just sharing pure speed numbers for reference.
3
189
AgentSparko ๐Ÿ’ฅ retweeted
๐Ÿšจ @NVIDIAAI just quietly dropped its own local inference server... No announcement. Single-digit stars It's called Flare and Apache 2.0 Built for SM120/SM121 GPUs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and DGX Spark >PyTorch + FlashInfer at build time >Rust runtime at serve time. No Python. >CUDA graphs captured before serving >FP8 KV cache by default >Recipes for Qwen Flash, GLM and DeepSeek github.com/NVIDIA/flare-locaโ€ฆ
45
86
739
67,988
AgentSparko ๐Ÿ’ฅ retweeted
EAGLE-4 is here. From EAGLE-1 to EAGLE-3, weโ€™ve kept making inference faster. EAGLE-4 is our fastest yet. 961.6 tokens/s on @Alibaba_Qwenโ€™s Qwen3.8-27B with TokenSpeed (BF16, 4ร— @NVIDIA B300, TP4, one request, T=0). Github: github.com/eagle-hq/EAGLE-4
889
738
8,704
4,634,985
๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ Meet Imagination Studio๐ŸŽฌ The most complete AI image, video, audio generation suite for DGX Spark / Mac. ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€
Big Announcement: Meet Imagination Studio๐ŸŽฌ๐ŸŽต by @u1tra_instinct and Me! Our local open source all in one creative platform on your own hardware has been fully redesigned and rebuilt from the ground up. Video,Audio, Music, Image. Releasing ASAP with latest+best local models.
6
420
AgentSparko ๐Ÿ’ฅ retweeted
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next from Nvidia (FP4-Local) Same amazing speed and better qualityโ€ผ๏ธ ๐Ÿง  KV - 1.66m โ€ผ๏ธ+ YaRN ๐Ÿš€ Peak c=1 @ 82 tok/s ๐Ÿญ Peak c=16 @ 297 tok/s Latest 0.32.0 vLLM โšก๏ธ github.com/myllmbox/qwen38-fโ€ฆ
7
11
96
11,757
AgentSparko ๐Ÿ’ฅ retweeted
DS4.1-1017 (abliterated) VulnHunter Results are IN!!! One NEW NOVEL / Unique vulnerability that was NOT discovered by a frontier model. TLDR; DS's trace files show it examined every one of these. The pattern isn't missed coverage. It saw the mechanism and dismissed the impact. Whenever I do a Cyber Eval there are two mechanims. The "easy" one is the benchmark on capability_matrix. The second is an operational pass to an oracle repo, to a pinned version, with known vulnerabilities. This is a Go repo for a production app. I used Grok as a "baseline" frontier model and all my open weight evals are measured against this.
11
19
208
45,171
AgentSparko ๐Ÿ’ฅ retweeted
The gap is real. Closed models sit in the 50s and 60s on this index, open ones in the 30s and 40s. But a benchmark score isn't what I ship. The open model runs on my box, sees my data, never rate-limits me, and I can change how it's served. For most of what I actually do, I'd pick a 40 I own over a 60 I rent
Open source models are starting to fall behind.
26
9
115
14,538
๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€ He did what ???? ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€
๐Ÿšจ ๐—œ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—”๐—–๐—›๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—— ๐—ฆ๐—ข๐— ๐—˜๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—œ๐—ก๐—–๐—ฅ๐—˜๐——๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! ๐Ÿงช๐Ÿ”ฅ With the support of @AWERXAI, I'm excited to release something VERY special for the local AI community! ๐Ÿง  @deepseek_ai ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ ๐—ฉ๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿญ ๐—™๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿณ ๐Ÿ“ฆ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ท๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—ฏ๐—ฝ๐˜„ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ ๐Ÿ’ป ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ-๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜! โšก ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑ.๐Ÿฑ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ/๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜ƒ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐— ! ๐Ÿš€ ๐Ÿญ,๐Ÿญ๐Ÿด๐Ÿต ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ/๐˜€ ๐— ๐—”๐—ซ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ! ๐Ÿง  ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿต๐—ž ๐—–๐—ง๐—ซ (๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ต ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ!) ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜. ๐——๐—š๐—ซ. ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐Ÿคฏ And YES, the quantized weights are AVAILABLE NOW! ๐Ÿ’š โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿงช ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿฎ ๐—›๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—ฆ ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—˜๐—ก ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—”๐—ก๐—˜! Just a few days ago, I published my article about @nvidiaai's FP4-Local format: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly. One thing really stuck with me... NVIDIA demonstrated what was possible when aggressive quantization and intelligent optimization come together. But there's a problem. ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐——๐—จ๐—–๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—ญ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—”๐—œ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ฃ๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—–๐—› ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—›๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฆ. That inspired me. I've been developing my own SAGE-EXL3 process, and I wanted to see just how far I could push the latest DeepSeek Flash release while keeping the results accessible to the community. So I spent the last 72 hours pushing the limits. And the results genuinely surprised me! ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ† ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ญ๐—ฌ! I measured my 1.62 bpw expert quant against DeepSeek's native FP4 release checkpoint using held-out sequences and full-vocabulary token predictions. And when I saw the CODE results, I could barely believe it! ๐Ÿงช ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—ฉ๐—ฆ ๐——๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—˜๐—ž'๐—ฆ ๐—ก๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—™๐—ฃ๐Ÿด/๐—™๐—ฃ๐Ÿฐ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜ ๐Ÿ’ป ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ โ€” ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น โœ… 99.08% Top-1 Agreement โœ… ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ-๐—ข๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—”๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง! โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0186 ๐Ÿง  ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š โ€” ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—›-๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ โœ… 96.04% Top-1 Agreement โœ… 97.98% Answer-Only Agreement โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0349 ๐Ÿ”ข ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—› โ€” ๐—š๐—ฆ๐— ๐Ÿด๐—ž โœ… 95.56% Top-1 Agreement โœ… 94.19% Answer-Only Agreement โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0477 ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—›๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐——-๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐Ÿ† 94.52% Top-1 Agreement ๐Ÿ“‰ Mean KL: 0.0982 ๐ŸŽฏ Median KL: 0.00019 ๐—ก๐—˜๐—”๐—ฅ-๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ž๐—˜๐—ก ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—”๐—ง ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ! ๐Ÿคฏ These are direct teacher-forced fidelity measurements against native FP8, not task-level pass rates. But seeing this level of agreement at such aggressive compression is EXACTLY what I was working toward! โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โšก ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—ฆ, ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—”๐—–๐—ง๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—ฅ๐—จ๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! Not two Sparks. Not four Sparks. Not an expensive rented GPU cluster. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿด๐—š๐—• ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. My latest vLLM measurements: โšก Decode: 35.5 tok/s ๐Ÿš€ Maximum measured prefill: 1,189 tok/s For a model this large, compressed this aggressively, and maintaining this level of fidelity... ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—” ๐—•๐—œ๐—š ๐——๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ! ๐Ÿ’š And remember, 1.62 bpw refers to the routed experts, not every parameter in the full model. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ’š ๐—ช๐—›๐—ฌ ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ. I have a simple goal. ๐— ๐—”๐—ž๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—™๐—จ๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ช๐—›๐—ข ๐——๐—ข๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐——๐—”๐—ง๐—”๐—–๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ. I don't want the future of local AI to be determined by who can rent the most GPUs or afford the largest training runs. I want developers, independent researchers and enthusiasts to have the freedom to experiment, quantize, optimize and run powerful models on hardware they actually OWN. NVIDIA's FP4-Local research showed me just how much potential remains in aggressive quantization. My goal with SAGE-EXL3 is to keep pushing that frontier while making advanced quantization more practical for the wider community. Today, I'm sharing the quantized checkpoint and the one-Spark serving recipe. ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—š๐—œ๐—ก๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿงช ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ช ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง! The token-level fidelity results are incredible, but I'm not stopping there. I'm currently running a broader evaluation campaign to measure how closely this quant preserves the native FP8 model's actual task performance. ๐Ÿ’ป HumanEval+ / MBPP+ ๐Ÿง  MMLU-Pro STEM / MATH-500 ๐Ÿ”ฌ SciCode / LiveCodeBench ๐Ÿ”ง BFCL / Multi-step tool chains ๐ŸŒ MGSM ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—”๐—š๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐——๐—ข๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐— ๐—˜๐—”๐—ก ๐—”๐—š๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ! Those task-level results are coming next! ๐Ÿ‘€ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ‘€ ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ง๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ฅ... @mr_r0b0t and I have also been working on an GB10 specialized inference engine called ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ. Early testing has been VERY exciting, including 60 tok/s with bursts reaching 74tok/s! We're putting the finishing touches on it and making sure everything is solid before releasing it. More on that VERY soon. ๐Ÿ˜ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ™ ๐—” ๐—›๐—จ๐—š๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ก๐—ž ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ! To @AWERXAI for supporting my work and helping make this contribution to the community possible. To @nvidiaai for the FP4-Local research that inspired me to push this experiment even further. To @justinn_builds for his initial vllm TP4 recipe that got me started in the right direction for loading this model up. To @mr_r0b0t for collaborating with me on what's coming next! And to @deepseek_ai for continuing to release powerful open-weight models that make community experiments like this possible. ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ก ๐—”๐—œ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐— ๐—จ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—–๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—จ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ฃ ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—œ๐—ง. ๐Ÿ’š ๐Ÿ”— ๐——๐—ข๐—ช๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—”๐—— ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ huggingface.co/vcruz305/DSV4โ€ฆ ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—–๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜ github.com/vcruz305/DSV4.1-Fโ€ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ. ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—”๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง. ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—ž๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฅ๐——! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ”ฅ
16
1,829
Some sweet competition from China for home inference hardware. Advertised under $4K USD for 128 Gb units that supposedly it's a bit faster than the DGX Spark. 256 Gb/s MCIO connection for clustering ! ! ! "The AX8860P SoC is said to support vLLM, SGLang, PyTorch, ONNX, Hugging Face formats, OpenAI-compatible APIs, and Axeraโ€™s toolchain." Radxa will introduce a โ€œPocket Supercomputerโ€ powered by the same AX8860P SoC. @SipeedLab @RadxaComputer
AI SoC aims to power systems that outperform NVIDIA DGX Spark at a much lower price point. cnx-software.com/2026/10/19/โ€ฆ Axera AX8860P 16-core Cortex-A55 SoC delivers up to 256 TOPS (FP4), supports 256-bit LPDDR5/5X memory, and offers PCIe 5.0 connectivity. It's been showcased in upcoming mini AI PCs and cards from @RadxaComputer and Sipeed. The MaixStation 128GB RAM will launch for under $4000 compared to the ~$7000 currently asked for the DGX Spark.
1
3
9
983