We do not aim to be popular. We aim to be true and correct. Sometimes that means your feelings will be hurt because you're wrong. That's not us being assholes, that's you rejecting reality. Simple as...

We can't take all the credit on this outcome, but it's always nice to see our efforts bear fruit. Many thanks to the broader freedom lobby weve partnered with in AZ. The AZLP is committed to continuing to show up and support liberty issues where we can. @infanzon @AZCDL_Freedom @GoldwaterInst @ArizonaAFP @EZAZorg

Basado

Abolish public unions.

Funnily enough, just preserving the constitution is radical change from the current state of the state

4 years ago the factions of the @Arizona_LP lived in harmony.

It seems counterintuitive, but an anarchist society would have the clearest set of rules and the most accountability to them. Explicit contracts have clear language of what happens when someone is in breach.

We are the only party that can truly claim to be Pro-peace and Pro-freedom. Our ideology logically concludes in these position because we base everything we believe in the principle of Non-Agression.

No such thing as a war hawk libertarian. If you advocate for war in Ukraine or Palististine or Iran you are not a libertarian.

Including sanctuary cities, and constitutional sheriffs.

If conservatives actually believed in the constitution and the the country the founders were building, they wouldn't support ICE.

Belief in government is harmful to your health and wealth.

Good enough for government work, eh? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

The anti-Federalists were right.

Have you considered using hot rocks to boil water?

By existing The State is in breach of contract because it has failed to secure the "consent of the governed" to exist.

🚨🇺🇸 Massie on the Epstein files: If this were a private law firm with just 5% of the DOJ's resources, they would have finished this work before the deadline. They just missed another deadline to report all politicians named in the files, and they're supposed to justify all the redactions they've made. The bigger problem isn't missing deadlines, but what they're redacting from the documents. They're trying to pretend the Privacy Act overrides a law that explicitly says records cannot be withheld to avoid embarrassment. They're also citing FOIA standards, which don't apply to our law. They're trying to claim they don't have to release internal decisions, even though our bill specifically requires them to do so.

Governors shouldn’t ask social media platforms to ban accounts.