I'm glad to see that they sabotaged your event, discrimination of any kind is evil. In every society there are people that advocate for discrimination, they claim "all other discriminations are bad, but this one's good". They're wrong, discrimination is always evil!

יהי זכר צדיק וקדוש לברכה ונשמתו הזכה והטהורה צרורה בצרור החיים הי"ד לא נשכח לעולם

It's easy to call someone a liar when they are a liar.

Former MIT scientist wins $6M defamation verdict against colleague who accused him of sexual misconduct. nypost.com/2026/10/18/us-new…

יהי זכר צדיקים וקדושים לברכה ונשמותיהם הזכות והטהורות צרורות בצרור החיים. הי"ד לא נשכח לעולם

She met him at the club and thought she could slap him and get away with it. Instead of getting physical or escalating the situation, he handled it the right way and had her arrested. That’s how you deal with disrespect without losing your cool.

Make the false accuser famous.

False accuser & proven liar, Kristin Knouse. Female predators need to be removed from the system that protects them.

All the men were doxxed. I don't see why she should get a pass. "But she's the victim." No she isn't. This whole thing is largely her fault. Blame is shared, the men didn't act well, but it is MOSTLY her fault. Consenting, clearly and loudly and often, and THEN trying to retroactively "take back" the consent is a really evil thing to do. If it's "okay" to know the names of men accused of rаpе, it's certainly okay to know the name of a false rаpе accuser. If anyone should be publicly named and shamed, it is women like this.

This is how you do it guys. Every woman crying MeToo without evidence should be sued. Also, file criminal charges as well. Jail these liars.

הלוחם הגיבור אחסאן דקסה נפל בעזה היום לפני שנתיים בדיוק. שתפו לזכרו של אחסאן דקסה גיבור ישראל!!

HOW WEAK EVIDENCE BECOMES ACCEPTED WISDOM: THE “23 MINUTES TO MISOGYNY” MYTH Here's a disturbing example of how academic research can be transformed into a sensational media narrative, amplified by activists, and ultimately used to influence public policy. You've probably heard the claim: “Boys are exposed to misogynistic content within just 23 minutes of joining social media.” It's repeated with remarkable confidence, as though it were an established scientific fact. But where did this extraordinary claim come from? A 2024 Dublin City University experiment involving just TEN artificial social media accounts. Not thousands of Australian boys. Not hundreds. Not even ten real teenagers going about their ordinary lives. Just ten researcher-operated accounts on TikTok and YouTube Shorts. And here's what the headlines rarely explain: ❌ Some accounts deliberately searched for manosphere influencers. ❌ Researchers interacted with recommended content, influencing what the algorithms subsequently displayed. ❌ The 23-minute finding concerned broadly classified “toxic” content, not exclusively explicit misogyny. ❌ Categories included material extending beyond hatred of women, raising legitimate questions about where criticism of feminism, traditional masculinity and self-improvement fit. ❌ The experiment did not establish that boys adopted misogynistic beliefs, became radicalised or harmed anyone. ❌ Its tiny, artificial sample cannot establish what millions of ordinary boys experience online. Yet within two years, this narrow experimental finding has been elevated into something approaching unquestionable truth. THE ACADEMIA–ACTIVISM–MEDIA PIPELINE Here's how it happens: 1️⃣ Researchers publish an exploratory finding with significant limitations. 2️⃣ Media outlets extract the most alarming statistic and turn it into a headline. 3️⃣ Activists repeat that headline, often stripping away the methodological qualifications. 4️⃣ Politicians and regulators cite the resulting narrative as evidence of an urgent social crisis. 5️⃣ Repetition creates the illusion of scientific consensus. And suddenly, a claim based on ten artificial accounts is helping shape national conversations about boys, masculinity, online safety and freedom of expression. This is how a finding becomes a narrative, a narrative becomes accepted wisdom, and accepted wisdom becomes the justification for government intervention. None of this means that genuinely misogynistic (or misandric) content should be ignored. Nor does it mean recommendation algorithms are harmless. There are legitimate concerns that deserve serious investigation. But good intentions don't excuse bad evidence, exaggerated conclusions or selective scrutiny... Where is the equivalent urgency about online misandry? Where are the comparable studies examining content that ridicules men, denigrates fathers or portrays boys as inherently dangerous? And why is the distinction between healthy masculinity and genuine misogyny so frequently blurred? Boys deserve protection from genuine harm. They also deserve protection from moral panics, discriminatory stereotypes and poorly evidenced policymaking. Academics must acknowledge limitations. Journalists must interrogate claims rather than merely amplify them. Activists must distinguish advocacy from evidence. Politicians must demand rigorous research before legislating. A statistic repeated a thousand times doesn't become a thousand times more reliable. And in this case the 23-minute claim is far from being even a valid statistic. Science should inform public policy. It should never become a convenient costume for ideology... Original study: Recommending Toxicity, Dublin City University (2024). #BoysMatter #MensIssues #MediaBias #ResearchIntegrity #GenderEquality #PositiveMasculinity #Misandry #OnlineSafety #EvidenceBasedPolicy #CelebratingMasculinity

Because we found out Jane Doe is a lying whore who made false allegations against 7 men. #DontBeleiveAnyWoman

This video is extremely satisfying to watch.

“Why would Jews ever need guns?!” Me: *points to France*

היום לפני שנה נפל בקרב בדרום הרצועה סג"מ איתי יעבץ ז"ל איתי ז"ל שירת כלוחם בתוכנית ארז בגדוד 932, חטיבת הנח"ל, בן 21 בנופלו יהי זכרו ברוך לנצח!

One year ago today, Second Lieutenant Itai Yavetz z"l fell in battle in the southern Strip. Itai z"l served as a fighter in the Erez program in Battalion 932, Nahal Brigade, aged 21 at his falling. May his memory be blessed forever!

Former MIT scientist wins $6M defamation verdict against colleague who accused him of sexual misconduct trib.al/q1cVlXE

Every man who is falsely accused needs to sue the false accuser.

THE UNITED NATIONS HAS A SERIOUS SEXISM PROBLEM. IT HAS BECOME BIGOTED AND HAS LOST ALL MORAL CREDIBILITY. In 1945, the United Nations Charter reaffirmed faith in the “equal rights of men and women.” The Universal Declaration of Human Rights subsequently proclaimed that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” Eighty-one years later, what happened to that noble commitment? Research published by Dr James Nuzzo in March 2026 exposes an extraordinary double standard: ♀️ 15 UN-recognised international days dedicated to women and girls. ♂️ ZERO dedicated to men and boys. Not even International Men's Day, first celebrated in 1999 and marked last year in more than 110 countries... The UN recognises days for bees, tuna, snow leopards, asteroids and basketball. Yet it cannot formally recognise a single day celebrating half of humanity!! This isn't an isolated oversight. It reflects a wider institutional culture in which gender equality too often means advocating for females while overlooking the suffering, disadvantages and contributions of males. Consider the global evidence: 🔹 Men die approximately FIVE YEARS younger than women. While in seven countries, men die over TEN YEARS sooner. 🔹 Around 80% of homicide victims are male. 🔹 Men account for the overwhelming majority of workplace fatalities. 🔹 Male suicide rates are two, three, and sometimes four times those of females. 🔹 UNESCO estimates 140 million boys are out of school. 🔹 Men constitute approximately 93% of the world's prison population. 🔹 Fathers face serious barriers to equal participation in their children's lives. Where is the comparable international urgency, compassion and institutional commitment? Why does disadvantage become a gender equality emergency when it affects females, but so often a matter of individual responsibility when it affects males? The UN has undoubtedly made important contributions to women's rights, humanitarian protection and international development. Those achievements deserve recognition. But they do not excuse ideological selectivity, institutional double standards or the marginalisation of men and boys. An organisation claiming to represent all humanity must not become an activist institution advancing one sex's interests while treating the other as a worthless afterthought. This isn't neutrality. It isn't impartiality. And it's certainly not Genuine Gender Equality. As Chair of the International Council for Men and Boys, I am proud that our upcoming Global State of Men and Boys Report 2026 examines 12 major disparities affecting males, drawing on evidence from more than 50 countries. Our approach is straightforward: recognise disadvantage wherever it exists, respect the dignity of every human being, and pursue evidence-based solutions for everyone... We are also working constructively toward UN recognition of International Men's Day. The UN should reform its gender institutions, abandon ideological one-sidedness, and restore public confidence through equal compassion, accountability and respect for both sexes. Supporting men and boys doesn't diminish women and girls, in fact it strengthens families and communities. Human rights are not a zero-sum game. The Future is Everyone. #UnitedNations #GenderEquality #InternationalMensDay #MensRights #HumanRights #MenAndBoys #GenuineGenderEquality #ICMB @un @menandboysnet

You wanted to globalize the intifada? Well, you got it.