This is tragic! R.I.P Jesus de Miguel. He died in a clash with FC Andorra goalkeeper Owono, also called Jesus.

This is what happens when historical ignorance is accompanied by an astonishing degree of intellectual arrogance. First, there were no “West African countries” during the transatlantic slave trade. The region comprised kingdoms, empires, city-states and independent societies. Applying modern national identities to centuries-old history is an extraordinary display of ignorance. Second, Europeans did not arrive in Africa as benevolent abolitionists. For centuries, they financed, institutionalised and industrialised human trafficking, supplying weapons that fuelled wars and slave raids, creating an enormous market for human captives, and codifying racial slavery into their laws. African collaborators existed, but their complicity does not absolve the European empires that sustained this monstrous commerce. Entire African communities were devastated, populations displaced, villages destroyed and societies destabilised. Millions were deported across the Atlantic, while countless others suffered captivity, violence and death on African soil. Africa was itself a vast crime scene, not merely the departure point of enslaved people. And perhaps the most remarkable historical fraud is how European nations have managed to present themselves as the liberators of the very people they spent centuries enslaving. I grew up in a former French colony in Africa being taught from primary school that slavery was abolished by a Frenchman named Victor Schœlcher. It was only in 2026 ( yes this year ) that I discovered that people in former British colonies had been taught a remarkably similar story, except that their white saviour was an Englishman named William Wilberforce. Yet long before Britain abolished slavery in its colonies in 1833, enslaved Africans in Haiti had fought a revolution, defeated European armies and proclaimed their independence in 1804. Toussaint Louverture and Jean-Jacques Dessalines were central to that struggle. In 1816, Haitian President Alexandre Pétion supplied Simón Bolívar with weapons, ammunition and military assistance to support South America’s liberation struggles, on the condition that he advance the emancipation of enslaved people. And he went on to free more than half a dozen Latin American countries. And what was Haiti’s reward for daring to liberate itself? Diplomatic isolation and, in 1825, a crushing indemnity of 150 million francs imposed by France, effectively forcing formerly enslaved people to compensate the descendants of their enslavers for the loss of their supposed property. Meanwhile, Britain compensated slave owners with £20 million following abolition, while the enslaved received nothing. Where are these stories in the European narratives of abolition? Where are Nat Turner, who led an enslaved uprising in Virginia in 1831, Queen Nzinga, who resisted Portuguese expansion and slave raiding in Central Africa, or the countless African rulers, communities and freedom fighters who resisted enslavement? Black people fought for their freedom. They rebelled, resisted, organised, sacrificed and died for it. Their liberation was never simply a gift bestowed upon them by benevolent Europeans. There is something profoundly tragic about descendants of enslaved Africans, born and educated in the lands of their ancestors’ enslavers, regurgitating sanitised colonial history, seemingly incapable of distinguishing historical scholarship from imperial propaganda. The greatest triumph of colonial indoctrination is when the descendants of its victims become the most zealous defenders of its mythology. What a pity!

RACISTS GOT 25 MILLION VIEWS CALLING BLACK KIDS TAKING CANDY "RUINING HALLOWEEN." HERE ARE WHITE KIDS DOING THE EXACT SAME THING. "Look who showed up to ruin Halloween for kids." One kid dumps the whole bucket into a bag while his friends laugh: "He just cleared out the whole bucket." Same act. Why does only one version go viral? Be honest.

Woman puts up a sign on her front door that reads, “Jesus loves you. No candy, but we have prayer. Ring the doorbell.” Watch what happens next. That kid is a leader. This is awesome. 🙏🏾 🎥 dmusic

The President of the United States has previously stated that if his beautiful daughter Ivanka weren’t his daughter, he’d probably date her. And in the video below he says he has a beautiful sister but has never had an interest in dating her - like, how does such a thought even form itself in his head?🤷🏾‍♂️. Why does this incestuous innuendo keep coming from Trump?

We produce 80% of what we cook at our Restaurant. If it appears on your timeline, kindly RT 🙏🏿❤️

🚨 COURT CASE ALERT 📍 VENUE: Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe, Harare 📅 DATE: Monday, 2 November 2026 ⏰ TIME: 09:30 AM The Constitution Defenders Forum (CDF) calls upon all Zimbabweans, constitution defenders, human rights activists, civic society organisations and all citizens who believe in constitutionalism to come out in solidarity tomorrow, Monday, 2 November 2026, as the Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe hears a matter in Case No. CCZ278/26. The matter, brought by Eliphas Kawa and Hazvineyi Machingura against the Minister of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs, Parliament of Zimbabwe, the President of Zimbabwe and the Attorney General, raises an important constitutional question concerning access to constitutional remedies and the right to approach the Constitutional Court for a declaration of constitutional invalidity. While it is primarily an application for direct access to the ConCourt, the applicants in the matter also argue that CAA3 can't take away their right to elect a President of their choice in terms of Section 67 of the Constitution without a referendum. The second aspect of their argument is the President's appointment of 10 senators which they argue takes away from the basic structure of the constitution. This is more than a court appearance: it is an opportunity to demonstrate our collective commitment to defending the Constitution. As Zimbabweans, we must never outsource the defence of our Constitution. The Constitution belongs to the people, and its defence is a collective responsibility. The Constitution is only as strong as the will of the people to defend it. Let us show up in solidarity and demonstrate that the people remain vigilant guardians of their Constitution. CAB3 may have been signed into law but the fight is far from over. #RestoreTheConstitution #TogetherWeDefend

𝟮𝟬𝟯𝟬 𝗣𝗨𝗧 𝗔𝗧 𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗞 𝗕𝗬 𝗧𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗔 𝗚𝗢𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗢 𝗡𝗘𝗚𝗢𝗧𝗜𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗡. Two days ago I also I said that a coup is not likely in Zimbabwe but an Sudan style uprising by civilians or Arab Spring remains a prospect if our government does not consider public interest over the interests of a few rich and wealthy individuals.

The gulf in presidential class between @BarackObama and @realDonaldTrump is as clear as day and night! There are no prizes for guessing who represents day and who represents darkness.

RT @nelsabbey: The idea that "Africans sold Africans" into slavery (or "Blacks sold Blacks") is a decontextaulised victim-blaming white sup…

Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer. Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war. To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha. The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people. And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final. We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it. Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made. They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making. One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.

Kemi, congratulations on leading a major British party as a Black Woman. It takes real talent to rise to where you are and deceit is what it takes to rise as a Black leader in a western Conservative Party. It is a pity the climb did not leave room for a history book and since you chose to argue in the language of history, let us do the history. Let’s dissect your verbal diarrhea point by point. Everyone participated." Slavery existed on every continent. So did war, and nobody calls a village feud the World War. The transatlantic trade ran for 366 years (1501 to 1866) and put about 12.5 million Africans on ships, of whom about 1.8 million died before they saw the Americas, according to the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database. It ran through joint-stock companies, chartered monopolies, Lloyd's underwriters and acts of Parliament. It was hereditary, because the law made the child of an enslaved mother property from birth. It was racial, because a whole continent was defined as chattel. No other system in history combined those features at that scale. Dissolving all of it into "people from every continent" is far worse than intellectual dishonesty. Britain was a market leader, not a participant. British ships carried about 3.2 million Africans, second only to Portugal and Brazil. The Treaty of Utrecht (1713) gave Britain the asiento, a thirty-year monopoly to supply 4,800 enslaved Africans a year to Spanish America. The Royal African Company, chartered in 1672 and headed by the Duke of York, later James II, branded its captives "DY". During Edward Colston's years in its leadership it shipped about 84,000 people, and roughly 19,000 died on the way. You say British taxpayers should not answer for what happened before they were born. They did. In 1833 Britain borrowed £20 million to compensate slaveholders, and taxpayers serviced that loan until 2015, including the descendants of the enslaved. So the principle you invoke was not applied when the cheque went to slaveholders. It only appears when the cheque changes direction. "Navel-gazing" is a curious charge from someone whose party spends more energy on the past (Empire nostalgia, culture war crusades) than most of those you accuse. Defend Britain if you must. But do not use your Nigerian name as the permission slip for arguments Nigerians know better than anyone.

Damn... this story hits heavy. She asked him to stop initiating, he actually listened for *sixteen months*, no pressure, no sneaking, nothing. And then one day he’s like “yeah I’m done living like roommates.” The quiet part is what gets me. He wasn’t yelling or cheating or making threats. He just slowly checked out while still showing up for the kid and the laundry. That’s the scary part is when the fighting stops because one person already left in their head. Sixteen months of “I’ll tell you when I’m ready” with no timeline is a long time to keep hoping the connection comes back. You can’t take one of the biggest parts of marriage off the table indefinitely and act surprised when the other person eventually walks. Painful story. Real one though.

Where can this evil bitch be found? Who has her name? Honestly, how can you brutalise a child for that long and call it discipline? Who can watch this and how long she goes at it and not consider this evil and criminal and deserving of jail time? @PoliceZimbabwe social media has made intelligence gathering effortless in such cases! Please arrest and charge that evil cow!

Apple should be grateful every single day for the rest of their existence for that decision by Trump to ban Huawei. This was the company that was going to topple them, because they're very innovative.

The pastors, bishops, apostles, so-called prophets and religious leaders of Christian denominations are the chief priests, Pharisees and scribes of today’s organised religion. Jesus Christ has never needed to be defended by anyone. I’ve never seen a logical, legitimate or sustainable accusation against Jesus Christ for how He lived or what He said. Christ is clean. Whenever you see yourself writing paragraphs upon paragraphs on social media in defence of Christianity, you’re most likely doing so in defence of a man or woman who claims association with Christ. Be careful that you may be expending so much energy defending a fallible human being whom Christ may, in that final day, dismiss from His presence with the words: “Depart from Me, for I never knew you!”

Contradictions in the "demoractic" alternative. The principal is adamant that his religious beliefs will lead to a democratic breakthrough, while his protégé, on the other hand, seems convinced that only organised human agency, can facilitate democratisation in the motherland.

Using God to deflect responsibility to do with mind and body what God allowed us to do for ourselves by giving us minds and bodies is irresponsible and a hindrance to human progress! The invocation of divine intervention in conversations about strategy and tactics does not remove the necessity of strategy and tactics in all endeavours in the physical realm. Even after praying and hearing from God, Joshua, who led the Israelites’ takeover of the Promised Land, needed meticulous military strategies and an able army to complete the assignment. The CCC under Chamisa was terminally hobbled by the absence of two crucial pillars: formal organisation, and a clear strategy.

This so-called pastor/prophet can marry as many wives as he wishes, but the correct Christian position will never shift nor change. As Brother @TevinMacharia eloquently puts it here, you can’t claim to be a Christian if Christ’s word is not the final authority over you! You have no part in Him nor His gospel. You can play religion all you like, and have your congregants follow you, and even be applauded by the world, but you do not belong to the body of Christ!