Abuse will result in a block. I'm not getting a lot of notifications, sorry if I don't reply. Letby murdered babies. #innocencefraud
- Tweets 52,824
- Following 566
- Followers 913
- Likes 95,669
Pinned Tweet
A short story of Richard Gill @gill1109 and Lucy Letby, Science on Trial @forensic_sci_ too.
@drphilhammond @ClarkeMicah
Whilst the first trial was on Sarrita Adams, a Brit in the US, created a website called Science on Trial. She is on X as @forensic_sci_ but blocks anyone who disagrees with her. She took Ben Myers' unfounded claims, which he made to try to cast doubt as is his
27
110
60
273,167
Nothing posted yet, tonight, Rob? We had our popcorn ready. You really shouldn't keep us in suspense.
It's amazing the lengths you will go to in your editing and the retired 'experts' you choose to use, to feed into the Letbyist narrative.
What's in it for you, Rob?
Shame on @channel5 and the @TheSun for their complicity. But then expectations for either are not that great to be honest, are they?
An hour and a half interview, and you gave Dewi Evans less than two highly maliciously edited minutes, whilst you and Ferguson hectored him like a couple of vacuous mean girls.
Can't you get any pathologists or radiologists, Rob, or at least someone who is still employed?
Ferguson is a particularly vile, arrogant and aggressive man, isn't he?
#innocencefraud
We are now ready to start sharing more on our investigation into air embolism - and whether it can really be relied on as the way #lucyletby murdered seven babies. More follows tonight.
2
4
31
1,109
Ooh, has "Scoop Dog Pattinson" commented?
#innocencefraud @RPattTheSun
5
2
26
964
RT @Courtwatch_Olly: Will he be addressing why Letby didn’t call any expert witnesses ? I think not…
Yet another Maltin slopfest incoming.…
4
3
Deb Roberts retweeted
@DebRoberts22249 good timely reminder Debs.
"It’s so terrible, and I’m sorry it happened while you were taking care of [Baby A]. You’re not having a great run at the moment!"
Message sent from Ashleigh Hudson to Letby at 10:37 on 12th June 2015, in response to Letby advising her of Baby A's rare, sudden, unexpected and unexplained death on 8th June and Baby B's sudden unexpected collapse on 9th June.
Baby A's was the first death in a sequence of such unexplained deaths in the following 12 months - and the first baby in the indictment - but it's clear from Ashleigh's message that there had been a number of such collapses when Letby was present just prior to his death for her to state that Letby was "not having a great run at the moment."
Nothing is known of these collapses/other potential deaths as they were not part of the indictment and so not investigated either at Letby'strial or Thirlwall.
But Ashleigh's words echo what Dr Brearey also told Thirlwall: "It's likely that Letby didn't start becoming a killer in June 2015, I think it's likely that her actions prior to then changed what we perceived to be abnormal."
#inncencefraud
3
4
141
You've just exposed that is it you that is the liar as can be evidenced and highlighted in red in my screenshot.
I didn't say you had blocked me - I said you had blocked me from replying mid-conversation because you did.
I haven't blocked you at all. I don't know what you're talking about.
In any case, you asked for someone and I gave you the chair of the Royal Statistical Society Law section.
Very minor individuals these obviously. /s
2
10
539
I believe it is irresponsible, as a doctor, for you to be commenting on evidence you know nothing about. Babies died, they have parents. It's not a game.
Doctor Caldwell appears to be in mental decline and also knows nothing about the case, has no relevant expertise, is not a neonatologist, and has not seen any of the evidence.
His post graduate training was diabetes and endocrinology - 2 months ago this was his level of knowledge on the insulin babies - it hasn't improved.
nitter.siddz.com/DebRoberts22249/status…
#innocencefraud
I agree. There are many areas of evidential weakness on this case. But, as a doctor, what I think is incredibly worrying is how implausible most of the medical evidence put forward by the police, CPS, prosecution and so called expert witnesses was. To anyone who has practised medicine for any reasonable length of time, most of it just doesn’t hold water and, to be honest, reflects a complete lack of understanding of the practise of medicine and of physiology, pathophysiology and basic medical sciences.
6
3
30
1,192
"It’s so terrible, and I’m sorry it happened while you were taking care of [Baby A]. You’re not having a great run at the moment!"
Message sent from Ashleigh Hudson to Letby at 10:37 on 12th June 2015, in response to Letby advising her of Baby A's rare, sudden, unexpected and unexplained death on 8th June and Baby B's sudden unexpected collapse on 9th June.
Baby A's was the first death in a sequence of such unexplained deaths in the following 12 months - and the first baby in the indictment - but it's clear from Ashleigh's message that there had been a number of such collapses when Letby was present just prior to his death for her to state that Letby was "not having a great run at the moment."
Nothing is known of these collapses/other potential deaths as they were not part of the indictment and so not investigated either at Letby'strial or Thirlwall.
But Ashleigh's words echo what Dr Brearey also told Thirlwall: "It's likely that Letby didn't start becoming a killer in June 2015, I think it's likely that her actions prior to then changed what we perceived to be abnormal."
#inncencefraud
9
6
42
2,217
Deb Roberts retweeted
The Mark McDonald - Letby's is he/isn't he instructed barrister - media circus continues.
Here he tells grifter Guy Rowland that Lady Justice Thirlwall doesn't know all of the facts.
He's miffed that LJT described the innocence narrative as noise, and takes it very personally.
According to McDonald, Lady Thirlwall should have allowed him to turn what were very dignified and professional proceedings into yet another of his media circuses, and should have ignored the trial and the jury and listened to his untested 'experts' who have, without exception, probably ruled themselves out of being actual expert witnesses due to their very public displays of innocence bias.
He doesn't appear aware that the Inquiry had access to ALL of the contemporaneous paperwork, apart from that of Ian Harvey's, much of which appears to have been wiped from the system.
Perhaps he should have snuck in in disguise and witnessed how professional barristers behave.
From the families' barristers, to the Inquiry barristers, to the Core Participants' barristers - all displayed professionalism, intelligence, respectfulness, dignity and knowledge of actual facts.
All that would seem to be totally alien to McDonald. There was no showboating and grandstanding.
Maybe that is what happens when chasing cameras is his aim after making applications to the CCRC for the past"27+" years without a single success.
#innocencefraud
1
2
14
436
The Mark McDonald - Letby's is he/isn't he instructed barrister - media circus continues.
Here he tells grifter Guy Rowland that Lady Justice Thirlwall doesn't know all of the facts.
He's miffed that LJT described the innocence narrative as noise, and takes it very personally.
According to McDonald, Lady Thirlwall should have allowed him to turn what were very dignified and professional proceedings into yet another of his media circuses, and should have ignored the trial and the jury and listened to his untested 'experts' who have, without exception, probably ruled themselves out of being actual expert witnesses due to their very public displays of innocence bias.
He doesn't appear aware that the Inquiry had access to ALL of the contemporaneous paperwork, apart from that of Ian Harvey's, much of which appears to have been wiped from the system.
Perhaps he should have snuck in in disguise and witnessed how professional barristers behave.
From the families' barristers, to the Inquiry barristers, to the Core Participants' barristers - all displayed professionalism, intelligence, respectfulness, dignity and knowledge of actual facts.
All that would seem to be totally alien to McDonald. There was no showboating and grandstanding.
Maybe that is what happens when chasing cameras is his aim after making applications to the CCRC for the past"27+" years without a single success.
#innocencefraud
6
7
27
1,734
.@HenryTudorStan if you are going to reply to me, and then block me from replying mid conversation, it shows a lack of conviction in what you are saying and incredibly petulant childishness, just like with your uncalled for abuse earlier.
I understand that @NickBarberX is who you really want to speak to after your massive meltdown with him a few months ago, because his honest statistics upset you.
But you are just so disingenuous that I may as well block you because you just want control of the conversation and narrative.
#innocencefraud
4
1
15
1,150
Oh, and by the way Professor Spiegelhalter said that whilst the rise in number of deaths were not a national outlier, they WERE cause for an investigation locally.
An investigation that you clutch your pearls at, so you are not honest, are you?
"As with all monitoring systems, signals can only trigger a more careful examination of the outcomes - they cannot reach any conclusions about ANY background causes."
This is 2015 data only,he didn't include the 2016 deaths.
1
6
340
I read Ben's latest excellent critique of Chris Morris' book - Chapter 9. Not having read the book, or any intention of reading the book, I'm reliant on Ben to break it down each week.
Morris had got to the medical 'stuff' by Chapter 9, and I was struck by how similar his narrative and presentation of his 'facts' were to the original grifter/fraud Sarrita Adams.
She originally wrote the disinformation/false narrative using the daily court reports and in particular focusing on Ben Myers KC's defence. It was eagerly shared by Dickie Gill, Peter Elston and Scott McLachlan. (Sacked Scott McLachlan is now writing his own book, of course.🙄) Adams was also the source for Rachel Aviv's New Yorker article.
She's since taken her website down - and is apparently not involved - after she provided a false PhD certificate to a Californian court.
But Morris repeats her disinformation for many hours every week on his money-making videos and in his book, but the way he used a paper that doesn't actually say what he claims it does, relying on people not to check, has convinced me it is most likely Adams' influence.
Morris is Keiko1234 on Reddit and was working with Adams' "content production strategy" in 2024.
nitter.siddz.com/UVuuMe/status/18240315…
David Thomas looked into Adams' disinformation in August 2024. I hope he doesn't mind me reposting it. Unfortunately Adams deleted her Twitter account, so only the screenshots remain, but I have it on good authority that the fraud is still active on the case.
#innocencefraud
New: Decoding Chapter 9 of @CPMorris1234 book ‘Reasonable Doubt’
bencole4.substack.com/p/deco…
Morris argues that the air embolism theory was never properly established and more conventional explanations were available.
This article shows that what Morris presents wasn’t overlooked at all.
The jury did not hear a simple prosecution narrative free from competing explanations. They heard those explanations and ultimately rejected them.
2
4
23
736
The beginning and end of yet another Mark McDonald interview, in which even McDonald looked bored, disinterested and dismissive.
And he loooooves the camera.
But maybe McDonald has left Furnival Chambers and joined Furvinall instead, whoever they may be.
This needs further investigation.
Or maybe Grifter Guy @guyrowlanduk can explain whether this was deliberate or not.
Bloody amateurs trying to sell #innocencefraud.
1
2
16
826