We spent years talking about $1 million bitcoin. We’re only starting to internalize how different that world was always going to be.
Bitcoin grew from individuals adopting, learning, and building before institutions were ready. That knowledge doesn’t disappear when a bank finally shows up; it only compounds.
Because of this, the individual will always be the most sophisticated market participant in bitcoin.
That's why legacy institutions are sleepwalking into what's happening, building omnibus wallets through single custodial models even though empirical evidence shows that over 50% of bitcoin sits outside for a strong reason.
That only grows as instos adopt bitcoin in size like individuals; they come to the same conclusion: I can't get knocked out of the game because someone fails.
Marc’s point here is that AI follows the same pattern.
An individual can change how they work tonight. An institution has systems, approvals, and existing businesses to protect.
While one is getting started, the other is getting better, FAST.
Now put open intelligence and open money together.
Smaller teams can build more, reach customers directly, get paid globally, and put the proceeds back into building.
That’s a compounding advantage, not just a head start.
An internet built around harvesting attention and renting access to customers doesn’t have to be the final version.
That’s what excites me about investing on the
@Early_Riders side; this was the thesis in the whitepaper 3 years ago, and also building
@OnrampBitcoin.
So much of what we accept as permanent was built before better tools existed.
I think the next great renaissance comes from people realizing for the first time that the only limits are imagination, execution, and taste for what the market wants.
Let's get it, and reach out if you are building for the new world with the new tools.