I also think
@Replit ,
@vercel v0,
@Lovable and the rest should consider using
@cerebras and
@GroqInc for MVPs and prototypes. It's very hard to edit and augment when you have to wait 2-3 min for the agent and it may/may not do what you want.
Also, consider the price of something like Kimi or GLM or Qwen, it is on average 1/3 of the price of a frontier company's LLM and you can still have Sonnet/Opus or GPT-5.1 be the orchestrator.
@Replit maybe you should add a fast design mode the same way you've added the fast mode for quick edits.
Of course, if you want to just retain your partnership with Anthropic (and maybe google with gemini 3), just use Haiku 4.5 or Flash 2.5:preview.
Theoretically if a code editor uses cerebras or groq, they may be able to create 3 previews of a site within a few seconds, for someone to do a visual choose your own adventure.
@amasad has discussed how PMs are expected to come up with a mock or demo to hand off/show engineers. It's not so great if you start off with mid, then iterate upon mid. Also, we are not yet at the point where everyone can accurately externalize their thinking via a prompt, but we are closer to folks being shown X options and them selecting which one is closest to what they were imagining.
@mattyp,
@amasad,
@rauchg,
@SarahChieng,
@ozenhati,
@JonathanRoss321 thank you all for having a public presence and making me aware of these tools/your tech.
@chamath your mention of
@GroqInc , last year is what introduced me to the world of inference, so thanks.