Socialism is not state capitalism. Hope is revolutionary. Utopia over dystopia. Ostracize tyrants.

Planet Gaia, System Sol
There is also a strong schmittian tendancy on the left not just to divide people into enemy and friend catagories but to activitely convert friends into enemies making close allies even closer enemies.
1
988
Worth a read
Seeing some Marxists dismiss the student-led protests in France reminds me of Marx’s 1843 letter to Ruge. He urged us to enter into real struggles, identify with them, and help people understand what they’re fighting for. Criticism has to begin with the struggle itself.
1
169
"“We don’t have a king” is an idiotic reply to “No Kings” protests because it deliberately misses the rhetorical point in favor of pedantic literalism. The slogan is not a claim that a crowned monarch sits on a throne in Washington; it is a deliberate historical allusion to the American Revolution’s rejection of concentrated, unaccountable executive power, exactly the kind of power critics argue is being claimed or exercised through expansive claims of presidential immunity, norm-breaking, cult-of-personality politics, or efforts to subordinate independent institutions. Pointing out that the United States is a constitutional republic rather than a formal monarchy is a non-sequitur: it assumes the protesters are too stupid to know the basic form of government, when the actual argument is that certain behaviors or doctrines threaten the republican safeguards that were meant to prevent king-like rule. Effective disagreement would engage the substance, whether specific actions truly exceed constitutional bounds or merely reflect ordinary partisan exercise of power, rather than pretending the metaphor is a category error."
65
all ya populists out there should be running on this
54
For USA based folks:
8
1
2
127
The orange would be king is enamored with receiving participation trophies
1
81
Anyone know anything more about this group communisation.org/
60
Three struggles — one trap The circumstances in Spain, France and Germany are different. But everywhere the same political mechanism appears. A struggle begins from below. People discover that acting together gives them power. Then political organizations tell them: Turn your demand into legislation. Put pressure on parliament. Choose the correct party. Wait for the election. This reverses the real relationship. Workers do not become powerful because politicians listen to them. Politicians begin making promises because workers, tenants and students have started acting independently. Parliament then tries to transform active participants back into passive voters. In Spain, housing anger is already being converted into an election issue. In France, the student rebellion is already being interpreted through the coming presidential contest. In Germany, opposition to conscription is repeatedly redirected toward what the Bundestag should or should not decide. The message is always: Stop deciding yourselves. Choose somebody who will decide for you. Neither right nor left can abolish capitalist necessity The parliamentary right openly defends property, military power and “order.” The parliamentary left promises a different distribution of expenditure: more housing, more schools, perhaps somewhat less military spending. But governments do not stand above capitalist society distributing resources according to freely chosen priorities. They administer an economy based on profitability, wage labor, competition and accumulation. They defend national capital in world competition. They maintain the machinery of the state. And when interstate competition becomes sharper, every government faces pressure to strengthen the military apparatus. That is why replacing one governing party with another does not eliminate the forces producing high rents, austerity, precarious work and militarization. There can certainly be concessions. The French government has already withdrawn one proposed education measure under pressure from the movement. Such retreats matter. But they demonstrate something very different from the usefulness of parliament: collective struggle can force concessions. KEEP THE STRUGGLE IN OUR OWN HANDS In every school, neighborhood and workplace: Discuss together. Decide together. Form open general assemblies. Elect delegates for specific tasks. Make them immediately recallable. Send mass delegations to other schools, neighborhoods and workplaces. Exchange information directly across cities and borders. Do not allow parties or unions to negotiate away decisions taken by the people in struggle. Do not divide housing, wages, education and militarization into separate specialist campaigns. Their common basis lies in capitalist society itself. And do not wait for the next election. Spain’s tenants, France’s students and Germany’s school students are already demonstrating a simple fact that parliamentary politics tries constantly to conceal: We are strongest not when we choose who governs us, but when we organize our struggles ourselves. The task is not to put better people at the head of the state. The task is to extend the struggle until workers themselves become the force that decides.
1
65