A validator can be online 100% of the time and still underperform: late votes, missed proposals, delayed inclusion.
On Ethereum, the protocol rewards completed duties, not server availability.
What institutions should be able to see:
-Duty performance: attestation participation and timeliness, proposals and misses, per validator.
-Benchmarking: rewards compared with the network baseline, with consensus, fees and MEV reported separately.
-Risk posture: client mix, hosting and geographic distribution, slashing protection setup.
-Incidents: what triggers an alert, how fast clients are notified, and a written post-mortem.
-Change management: upgrade readiness and staged rollouts.
Delegating validator operations transfers the work, not the accountability.
If it matters to your risk, you should be able to see it.