Thiel’s suggestion here leads to a very sad future
Outside of extremely rare athletic talent or attractiveness, intellectual agency (aka “being smart”) is the sole vector through which an individual can climb social strata
In a world where intellect no longer matters and all engagement is relationship-based, you will be condemned to life and death in whatever social strata you were born into.
There will be no class mobility, just increasing tribalism among the elites. If you’re not already golf buddies with the elite, you will have no route to wealth. A caste-based permanent underclass.
—
My more optimistic take is that human knowledge (the kind in your brain) will only become more valuable in a world where the masses are pacified by cheap intelligence (the kind on your phone). The ability to recall important information rapidly without the use of a separate device will give you superpowers.
In a transactional conversation, the more intelligent party has the advantage. If your intelligence is disembodied, then what advantage does it bring?
Maybe in some future we all have super nueralink implants and cheap intelligence truly is embodied, but then we’ve sacrificed all thought anyways and are just meat puppets. Sad future.
All to say, I’d recommend staying smart rather than falling into this reworded “taste is the moat” mentality.
Walter Isaacson asks Peter Thiel what humans can uniquely do in the AI era.
Thiel: "We're very relational… these relational dimensions will become more important."
When knowledge is worth $0, the only career skills that matter:
- networking / social calibration
- persuasion (sales)
- curiosity (harnessing AI)
- taste (curation)
- storytelling
- grit
- golfing with clients (or equivalent)
We'll get so sick of a fake world that we'll go back to doing business like it's the 1800s. A handshake at the local saloon.