Let me break down what I'm seeing and hearing here from DR. I don't know DR's source for these materials , but they appear completely legit and are profoundly disturbing. These are leading members of the Democrat Party hatching up the following strategy: 1. After the midterms, use the DSA to incite and carry out violent civil unrest. 2. Make the violent civil unrest so bad that Trump must invoke the Insurrection Act. 3. Use the invocation of the Insurrection Act to create a national sense of illegitimacy whereby Democrat governors appear justified in taking the extreme action of refusing to acknowledge federal authority and push to form a new form of federal government via various means, including an Article V transformation of the Constitution. Maybe there is more to this and it's not as bad as it seems, but right now this appears to be a conspiracy to create the next Fort Sumter. This is a CIA-style color revolution in real time, on our own soil. (Of course the legacy media is nowhere near this--it takes us Internet randos to get the word out.)

Over the past few days I have heard a number of very sober, well-reasoned commentators on the political right talking about the midterms and related polling. They uniformly speak about the House already being a lost cause for the GOP, and they focus on whether the GOP can hold the Senate. Things do not need to be this way. Trump won in 2024 by large margins. The only reason that cannot be repeated this fall is if YOU—the average Trump voter—decides to let it happen. I know, I know, I know. Trump has not made all of your hopes and dreams come true in two years’ time. You think he has done nothing, even though he has had profound victory after profound victory in areas like immigration and downsizing the federal government. You have your pet issue that has not been satisfied to the extent you demand, so you want to “Stay home and send them a message.” Yes the GOP sucks. It’s a heinous mess of self-interest and failed status quo maintenance. But the only thing worse is the Democrat Party. We are running against LITERAL COMMUNISTS who want to abolish the Senate, pack the Supreme Court, add two new deep blue states, open the borders to unlimited immigration and succumb to creeping Sharia and jihad in order to literally destroy the nation. (Plus, they will spend the next two years impeaching Trump and everyone in his orbit, fully defeating what you voted for in 2024.) So you have two choices. It’s a binary choice, there is no third option: 1. Vote for doing everything we can to pursue MAGA even if that’s not perfect. 2. Stay home and become ruled by literal Communists who want you dead. Choose. We can still win this fall, we just need the will to do it.

I think the expulsion of those three media outlets from the White House is a mistake, but the record of mainstream outlets in covering Trump is atrocious, as @VDHanson enumerates in detail below.

Here's a look back at how some of the self-proclaimed "news organizations" covered VP candidate JD Vance versus how they covered VP candidate Tim Walz. See if you can spot the difference.

Well said

Quote: “…one can dislike Trump and still recognize the accomplishments are real and laudable. If personal dislike for the president prevents someone from seeing that, the real bias problem is with them. “

Here it is: If there is any single reason to pass the SAVE America Act is this👇👇 right here 👇👇 “This 👇👇 literally blew us away. We went there to find fraud, and we found this by accident.” The four years of Biden were a deliberate, treasonous conspiracy orchestrated by the Democrats against the American people. They imported illegals, issued them Social Security numbers, gave them benefits, placed them on Medicaid, registered them to vote, and even had them cast ballots in elections—all while human traffickers raked in $13 to $15 billion and called it the “most secure border in U.S. history.” @elonmusk: “It was a massive, large-scale program to import as many illegals as possible, ultimately to change the entire voting map of the United States, disenfranchise the American people, and make it a permanent deep-blue, one-party state from which there would be no escape.” Democrat billionaire donor Antonio Gracias: • They issued illegals Social Security numbers. • They qualified illegals for maximum Social Security benefits. • They enrolled illegals in Medicaid. • They were registering illegals to vote. See the graph in the video: “Then you’ll notice there’s something strange—what jumped out at us when we saw these numbers. We’re like, what is this? In 2021, you see 270,000 people; it goes all the way to 2.1 million in 2024. These are illegal aliens who are getting Social Security numbers. This is a mind-blowing charge. This literally blew us away. If I hadn’t seen this myself, I’m not sure I would have believed it. I went through it myself and mapped it. And Elon is right. This is true. The defaults in the system—from Social Security to all of the benefit programs—have been set to max inclusion, MAX PAY for these people, and minimum collection. We found 1.3 million of them already on Medicaid, as an example. We went through every benefit program, and we found groups from this particular population—this 5.5 million illegals—in those benefit programs. And then what was really, really disturbing to us was why. We kept asking ourselves why. So we actually just took a sample and looked at voter registration records, and we found people here registered to vote in this population. Yes. Who did vote? From our sampling, we found that they—illegals—ACTUALLY DID VOTE.”

An article I've been working on for a while. The Seditious Six did not spring out of nowhere. They came from an institutional lineage that started soon after President Trump got elected.

Priceless

Roughly 40 percent of college faculty would “oppose hiring a Trump supporter.” The results of the study are not surprising for many in higher education. If anything, it may be on the low side. jonathanturley.org/2026/08/0…

“if they came out with that statement… it would undermine the DOJ’s efforts at mandates.” It’s literally everything we all suspected, got banned for saying, which they denied publicly, but confessed in a diary.

Did Former FBI Agent Nikki Floris Run a ‘Shadow Government' During the 2020 Election? | Tim O'Brien, PJ Media After President Donald Trump’s disruptive primetime speech to the nation on July 16, he revealed that his administration had evidence that federal intelligence officials withheld intelligence about China’s involvement in election tampering in the U.S. For a U.S. president to make such a claim, he’d better have the receipts, and the president promised that he did. Now, reports are that Nikki Floris, a former FBI analyst and senior leader who was charged with oversight of election security in 2020, once wrote that she was “basically running a shadow government across the FBI.” This in the context of a report that now alleges that China was behind the manufacture of fake driver’s licenses as part of a massive, subversive mail-in ballot system. The president mentioned this “shadow government” in his remarks, alleging that federal officials hid from his administration intelligence tied to China’s election interference operations. While Trump did not specifically mention Floris in his speech, newly declassified FBI messages peg Floris as the originator of the “shadow government” term in this context. In his speech, Trump was not being hyperbolic. He drew his phrasing directly from the documents that back up his claims. One email among intelligence analysts admitted that they had, quote, deliberately massaged the presidential daily briefing to withhold information regarding Chinese activities related to the election… Another official inside the FBI wrote that she was running, quote, a shadow government, unquote, to keep intelligence about China’s election meddling from becoming known, Trump said. This online chat happened on Sept. 25, 2020, and it reveals that a report, called an Intelligence Information Report (IIR), on possible Chinese election interference was recalled. A group called The Oversight Project has reported that Floris received the report from the FBI’s Albany field office, but it isn’t clear how long the FBI knew about the alleged Chinese activity. It did indicate that the Chinese method was to use TikTok data it stole to create those fake driver’s licenses and fraudulent Biden ballots. Within minutes of the Albany field office releasing the report, it appears FBI headquarters recalled it. One day before this, on Sept. 24, FBI Director Christopher Wray appeared before the U.S. Senate and told them that his FBI had “not seen... any kind of coordinated national voter fraud.” That next day, on Sept. 25, Floris asked if the report from Albany was revised and then indicated that the FBI was about to direct all field offices to route election-specific reports through FBI headquarters and its Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF). Why? What did FBI leadership know, and when did it know it? At the time, Floris was a deputy assistant director in the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division. She was the FBI’s election security lead for the 2020 presidential election. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), before the president’s most recent national address, did his own due diligence on this matter. Grassley chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, which confirmed that Floris was one of those involved in requesting the IIR be recalled. This then prevented FBI field offices and other federal intelligence agencies from seeing the report. The Washington Examiner reported that, “According to Grassley, the FBI’s stated reason for recalling the report was concern that its contents would contradict then-FBI Director Christopher Wray’s congressional testimony.” Veteran investigative reporter Catherine Herridge has further added intrigue to this story by reporting that not only was Floris implicated in this IIR controversy, but that she may have had a hand in how the Hunter Biden laptop story played out in the run-up to the 2020 election. As to that IIR report, the Washington Examiner reported that an FBI analyst in Albany had “objected internally to the decision (to recall the report), saying the concern about political implications was troubling and inconsistent with the bureau’s responsibility to remain apolitical.” Prior to 2020, Floris came before the House Judiciary Committee in October 2019, where she stated that both Russia and China represented “pervasive and persistent threat” to America. In this clip, you can see that Rep. Ben Cline (R-Va.) asks Floris specifically what she’s seen in terms of foreign interference in American elections. Floris’s response: “To date, sir, we have not seen anything specific regarding hacking into the electoral systems of the 2020 elections.” One thing to note here is something I've pointed out in other recent articles about what to look for when a leftist makes a denial. There's a specificity to her response that is a red flag to what she's not talking about, the dog that's not barking. She denies knowing "anything specific regarding hacking into the electoral systems," but she avoids any mention of other means China and Russia might use to interfere with our elections, such as, for example, printing fake ballots and making fake driver's licenses. While this appearance before Congress happened roughly a year before that IIR report, we all know Chinese operatives didn’t just wake up one day in 2020 and start trying to interfere with American elections. If we were to take Floris at her word in 2019, then she and the FBI had to be well aware of the serious election interference threats posed by both China and Russia and how they operated in advance. What we don’t yet know is why. Why did Floris and company decide to withhold that report? How many other similar reports and documents were withheld from the first Trump administration? Who directed these things to happen? In 2022, then-FBI Director Christopher Wray tapped Floris to serve as an intelligence analyst in the Washington Field Office’s Intelligence Division. When Kash Patel took over at the FBI, he sent Floris packing in May 2025. At the moment, she’s a senior manager at Microsoft, where she’s in charge of “insider risk,” according to the Washington Examiner. When the president gave his address on July 16, he knew he was opening a Pandora’s box. He also knew that the legacy media and so many other powerful forces would work to suppress reporting and information on all of this. But at the same time, Trump has given us threads to pull, and once we pull at each one, the whole scheme starts to unravel before our eyes. The legacy media and the left were able to put a tyrannical lid on all of the shenanigans around the 2020 election to this point. They moved in lockstep, not allowing any daylight to expose what really was happening at the time. Finally, we’re getting something to work with. We can’t let the left marginalize this now. We can’t let the legacy media frame this as just more “conspiracy theories” as though the very word “conspiracy” is equated with “falsehood.” These things are real, and they are serious. Because we have the truth on our side, it’s up to us to never let this go until the legacy media and the left are forced to face a reckoning they’ve long been trying to avoid. The time has come. pjmedia.com/tim-o-brien/2026…

When are we going to start jailing Legislators, Judges, and Police for violating our Second Amendment Rights? What good are Civil Rights when the bad guys violate them with impunity?

These four RINOs voted to undermine the President in his negotiations with Iran. Massie lost his primary. The others were unopposed. This is inexcusable. They are providing Aid and Comfort to the enemy. • Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA): @RepBrianFitz • Tom Barrett (R-MI): @RepTomBarrett • Warren Davidson (R-OH): @Rep_Davidson • Thomas Massie (R-KY): @RepThomasMassie

🚨READ IT The Justice Department just secured a superseding indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center, and it reveals some new bombshells 🧵1/20 dailysignal.com/2026/04/26/s…

The Democrats are looking at this case and salivating. Elon, buying X may be your greatest accomplishment for the world.

USCP Officer Brian Sicknick died, uninjured, from an unrelated stroke, the next day in his office. The USCP and Democrat Leadership lied and repeated endlessly that he was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher for four months until the ME report was forced out. Most Democrats still believe the lie. They needed the “Deadly Insurrection” narrative. There is no innocent explanation.

REMINDER: The worst scandal in U.S. history is the Trump/Russia Collusion Hoax. This was literally a coup attempt, executed by a sitting incumbent President (to block his successor) and the losing Presidential candidate (to overthrow the man who defeated her in a fair election). WORST SCANDAL IN U.S. HISTORY. And we are all so used to the crazy things the Democrats try to do that we lose sight of the sheer, awful magnitude of this scandal.