Stop the sneering. If Ed Miliband’s best route to young voters is Russell Brand, so be it | Owen Jones trib.al/T2wguPu

"We take over the state. We take over the police. We use the police to arrest all the landlords and zionists." Said by one of main proposers of the Green party's racist 'zionism is racism' motion. The others laugh but he doesn't. Why would he- it's what he meant

If you are struggling to understand what is happening in American politics right now, watch this: "Palestinization" is a concept that I developed two years ago to explain the framework that most electoral candidates, especially Islamist-aligned ones, use to align voter bases in the United States. We saw this so evidently in the campaign messaging of the current elections.

An insider exposes the BBC's complete internal surrender. Former producer Phil Craig reveals that terrified executives handed newsroom control to young activists, fueling false Gaza reporting.

The UN just elected the judges who will rule on the "genocide" case against Israel. One of them, Jordan's Mahmoud Hmoud, already called it "genocide" and "ethnic cleansing" weeks after October 7, before a single piece of evidence was heard. Another, Phoebe Okowa, sat on Namibia's legal team arguing against Israel at the same court. In any real court, that's called a conflict of interest. At the ICJ, it's called a qualification.

The Fox Killer's latest grift is a fundraising campaign to challenge the Government's Bell Report on school antisemitism claiming it stops children "criticising" Israel & uses "very dodgy methodology". But is that true? (Hint, it's not) Let's look at the facts, shall we? 🧵1/9

This tactic is known as the Livingstone Formulation. It describes when these people respond to a charge of antisemitism by refusing to engage with the substance of the accusation and instead counter claim that the accuser is acting in bad faith by weaponising antisemitism allegations to shut down legitimate criticism of Israel or Zionism. How to know when antisemites are using this insidious sleight of hand: 1. They refuse to discuss the actual content of the antisemitism accusation, and instead shifting focus onto the supposed hidden motive behind it. 2. They make a counter-accusation that the person raising the issue is not merely mistaken, but is doing so deliberately and dishonestly. 3. They collapse a range of speech or actions (some of which may be antisemitic) into the single protected category of criticism of Israel. 4. They suggest that those who raise antisemitism concerns are part of a broader, coordinated effort to silence such criticism.

This video explains pro-Pal tactics perfectly. Once you see it, it all makes sense.

I'm going to say something that needs to be said. If the United States hadn't stopped Israel while it was bombing Iran on its own, no one would be able to accuse the President of starting a war with Iran and use it as an excuse to vote for Democrats. The war could have been over, and the Iranian regime could have been gone more than a year ago. There was absolutely NO NEED to prolong this war. NONE! Not for Qatar. Not for Turkey. NOT FOR ANYONE!

Humza Yousaf, author of Under Fire, an important and painfully honest testament, could never have flourished in Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, still less the Conservatives. As a proud Muslim and supporter of the Palestinian cause, that would have been out of the question. In the Scottish National Party, which embraced multiculturalism as its southern counterparts drifted towards coercive liberalism, he rose to the top. @OborneTweets: Humza Yousaf's private war newstatesman.com/culture/boo…

After considerable thought, I have resigned my membership of Reform UK and decided to rejoin the Conservative Party. Over recent months, I have become increasingly frustrated with Reform's embrace of left-wing economic policies, growing social conservatism, and a concerning shift towards nationalism, particularly its support for protectionist measures such as tariffs. I have also become disillusioned with the apparent lack of tolerance for internal criticism. Having previously received ridicule from Reform supporters for defending the principle that being gay or transgender should never be a crime, I have increasingly questioned whether my commitment to individual liberty is shared by those around me. Ultimately, my political ideology has not changed. I remain committed to individual liberty, free-market economics, limited government, and personal responsibility. Rather, I believe Reform UK has moved away from the principles that initially attracted me to the party. Whilst I recognise that the Conservatives are far from perfect, I believe they offer greater opportunities for open debate, constructive criticism, and the advancement of my political beliefs. @Conservatives

Happy Birthday to me: Tories two points off Labour in best polling since election thetimes.com/article/41ec189…

This week on @TheRestHistory, the epic and tragic story of the HUNGARIAN REVOLUTION of 1956. We explore the Cold War context, the high drama of the street uprising and the Kremlin's decision to send in the Red Army. Club members can hear it all now: therestishistory.com.