i used to know a guy who we locked in crypto together. he used to be all serious about that he barely even had time to touch grass. he would often say to me “you play to much and seem nonchalant about this whole thing” Fast forward to today, he is doing well, but not in crypto. he concluded crypto didnt work for him because he mathematically projected that with how serious he was, he should start getting it clear before me. he equated his focus to meaning quicker result, but he was wrong. something i have noticed about locking in is that, most people who lock in by doing what they love while being flexible about it are the ones who get the most result. life isn’t that serious. if you are always hell bent on getting result and doing something because others say it’s profitable and not because you fw it, you’re most likely not going to profit from it in the long run. longevity in the context, sooner or later, you’re going to get tired from doing it because you’re there for the result it promises and not because you believe in it. a lazy person doing something they love will always do it better than a serious person doing something they don’t love because if you love something, you’d find smarter and more efficient ways to go about it, without stressing.

Currently at Blockfest Having a deep conversation with Samuel Xeus, aka biggest oracle. Bro looked me dead in the eyes and said, “Kamal, you have no idea what’s coming. You and I are about to be so disgustingly rich that money will become a social experiment to us.” He said we’ll be buying countries instead of houses and arguing with our accountants over which yacht to take to the next conference. Then he grabbed my shoulder and said, “Remember this moment. When we’re both billionaires, they’ll call us visionaries.” I almost shed a tear. #blockfestwithikoroduoracle

Don’t hide your scars. Let your story reveal God’s grace. #triumph30

Ladies and gentlemen, my name is David Ogooluwa but you guys know me as Dotify. I am the biggest web3 host in Africa and I will be your host for @blockfestafrica 2026.

Jesus is the full picture!

𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓'𝐒 𝐀 𝐖𝐑𝐀𝐏 𝐎𝐍 𝐃𝐀𝐘 𝟏! 🔥 From the workshops and masterclasses to The Backroom, Day 1 was filled with insightful conversations, valuable lessons, and great energy in every room. It's definitely one for the books! Here's your recap. #BlockfestAfrica #BlockfestAfrica2026 #TheNewTradeRoute

Nullmask / $MASK: the most underrated privacy coin of the cycle $MASK is currently sitting at around $23.5m market cap ($40m FDV, with 40% of supply out of circulation and 2.16% already burnt) i believe Nullmask is by far the most underrated privacy coin in all of crypto, and i'll explain why in this thread let's start by looking at the top privacy coins and their market caps: • ZCash / $ZEC: $21 BILLION market cap • $NEAR: $6.8 BILLION market cap these two have been by far the biggest gainers in the top 50 cryptocurrencies over the past year, and it's not even close! if it isn't already obvious, both have run hard (and continue to run) on the PRIVACY narrative but what's impressive isn't just their gigantic market caps it's how much they've added in the past year alone: • ZCash added $18 BILLION to its market cap • NEAR added $4.3 BILLION to its market cap all before the bull run has properly started so how does this affect Nullmask / $MASK? the incredible runs ZEC, NEAR, and other privacy coins have had have established beyond reasonable doubt that this is the privacy cycle and i believe Nullmask is going to win big because it sits right at the heart of this narrative, with several key advantages that many much bigger privacy coins don't have let's start with the PRODUCT Nullmask makes private transactions possible across EVM chains and Solana in the most normie-friendly way imaginable you can use your existing wallets (MetaMask, Rabby, Phantom, etc.) the same way you normally would, while enabling private transactions across major ecosystems like Ethereum, BNB, Base, Robinhood, and Solana yes, you read that right you don't need to learn how to use a new wallet, create a new seed phrase or private key, learn to navigate a complicated new blockchain, or deal with any of that nonsense you can activate Nullmask's privacy capabilities on your existing crypto setup in just a few clicks all you need to do is activate Nullmask's custom RPC and let its 'virtual private network' shield your transfers using zero-knowledge proofs i'm simplifying the technical details to make this as normie-friendly as possible, but that's the gist of it and this isn't just speculative stuff: Nullmask is already LIVE & WORKING on Ethereum, BNB, Base, and Robinhood you can actually use the product and verify that it works! but i'm bullish on $MASK for more than just the product TOTAL ADDRESSABLE MARKET (TAM) what makes Nullmask so incredibly bullish and underrated isn't just how impressive the product is, but the size of its total addressable market i've never used the ZCash or NEAR blockchains, and the same is true for tens of millions of users across Solana, Robinhood, Base, BNB, and Ethereum yet ZCash and NEAR have market caps of approximately $21 BILLION and $7 BILLION, respectively the average crypto user may never touch the ZCash or NEAR blockchains, but they're already using Ethereum, Robinhood, BNB, Solana, and Base and Nullmask caters to those users this begs the question: what is fair value for Nullmask when ZCash and NEAR are both trading at multibillion-dollar valuations? LET'S TALK ABOUT THE TEAM when a protocol promises something as ambitious as Nullmask does, you obviously want to know who's building it and whether they're capable of delivering Nullmask is built by several ZCash contributors, led by Tomas Krnak Tomas Krnak helped build shielded ZCash transactions for hardware wallets. his work was funded by the ZCash Foundation and merged into the main ZCash protocol itself i should also add that the lead dev is doxxed and regularly participates in live interviews! PARTNERSHIPS & INTEGRATIONS we've established that the team has serious credentials in the privacy space and that the product is already live and working but what about partnerships, integrations, and endorsements? here's a list of industry players Nullmask has collaborated with in some form since launching: • NEAR Protocol ($11.3 BILLION ATH) • THORChain ($4.4 BILLION ATH) • Dashpay • Beldex • Quai Network the team also revealed in a recent AMA that it's in discussions with major wallet providers, including MetaMask, about potentially integrating Nullmask as an additional privacy layer all of this for a product that isn't even a month old, by the way! METRICS & REVENUE Nullmask looks incredibly strong from a fundamentals perspective, but the key question is: what do the metrics actually look like? since the protocol launched a little over two weeks ago, Nullmask has generated: • $37.8 MILLION in total protocol volume, averaging $2.36 million per day • $833k in total revenue, averaging $52k per day it has also burnt 2.16% of supply and distributed $1.4 MILLION in $ZEC rewards to holders since the token launched approximately three weeks ago (token launched a week before the protocol) and here's the important part: all these adoption metrics were recorded before the protocol is live on Solana, which is expected to happen next week, and mostly before it went live on Robinhood and BNB just a few days earlier the team also has 20% of the token supply allocated to a long-term incentives campaign designed to encourage people to use the protocol and accelerate adoption i should also add that Nullmask is now ranked #1 among ALL privacy protocols for both 7-day and 30-day revenue, according to DeFiLlama, barely two weeks after its protocol went live, and by a clear margin this is despite the fact that -it only went live on Robinhood and BNB a few days earlier - it is yet to launch on Solana - its incentives program aimed at accelerating adoption is yet to launch the speed of adoption Nullmask has witnessed is impressive for any privacy protocol TOKENOMICS 20% of the token supply is allocated to the team and locked for two years, meaning these tokens won't start entering circulation until at least two years after token launch another 20% is reserved for an incentives campaign aimed at accelerating protocol adoption the remaining 60% of supply is circulating this means approximately 60% of the supply is currently in circulation, while the bulk of the rest won't enter circulation anytime soon ROADMAP • Launch on Ethereum, Robinhood, BNB, and Base (LIVE) • Cross-chain bridge (LIVE) • Unshield directly to ZEC wallets (October 2026) • Launch on Solana (Q4 2026) • NullMask SDK (Q4 2026) • Privacy Perpetuals (Q4 2026) TO CONCLUDE i know Nullmask might sound too good to be true right now, and it's crazy to me that it's sitting at such a ridiculously low market cap but believe it or not, all of the facts in my thesis above can be independently verified i'm not going to ask you to buy Nullmask i'm simply laying out my thesis and thought process for this trade, and explaining why i believe it could be a big one i objectively believe $MASK will become a multibillion-dollar token before the end of the bull run, and i expect it to be yet another kingmaker trade for me nothing in this thesis is financial advice it's up to you what you do with the above information

The first time I tried @MySpenda , the speed caught my attention. But the first question I had was , why can't I send out usdt?😂 I didn't know they were cooking.... Now we have Spenda 2.0, you can now deposit naira and send out usdt? Before I take you further , to get started on Spenda and start spending Download on play store and app store , then use my code 🥺 if you love me "2M7LTB2M" #MySpenda

No matter how good it gets, wake up and try again. No matter how bad it gets, wake up and try again.

🎁 BLOCKF3ST SPECIAL OFFER While we're giving away tickets to Blockf3st Africa, we're also giving you a reason to try Zone Alpha. Use the link below to subscribe and get: 🔥50% OFF for the first 5 subscribers ⚡30% OFF for the next few subscribers Only few discounted slots available. t.me/zonepaymentbot?start=re…

Blockf3st Africa is bringing the Web3 ecosystem together in Lagos this October, and Zone Alpha is giving more people a chance to be in the room. Whether you're already building in Web3, finding your footing in tech, or looking to meet the people and discover the ideas that could shape your next move, this is an opportunity to get closer to the ecosystem. We're giving away 20 free tickets to Blockf3st Africa 2026! How to enter: 1. Follow @zonexbt and @blockfestafrica 2. Like and comment on this post. 3. Quote-post this announcement with a brief explanation of your experience in tech/Web3 and why you want to attend Blockf3st. Include your unique Zone referral link. 4. Join our free channel: t.me/onchainalphatrench 5. Complete your entry through the Zone TG Bot: bit.ly/zonexblockf3st You do not want to miss BLOCKF3ST 🫵🏼.

Your Zone link can do more than bring people in. It can earn you money. If people already ask what you use to track wallets, investigate tokens, or find activity on-chain, you can turn those conversations into earnings. With 4 simple steps you can start earning: → Send /refer to the Zone Payment Bot to get your unique link. → Set a custom referral code to make it yours. → Earn 10% commission when someone you refer subscribes. → Withdraw your earnings directly to your wallet in SOL, BNB, or ETH. Have an audience on X, run a trading community, or create Web3 content? You can also apply to the Zone Partnerships Programme for higher commissions that increase with your referrals. No need to keep Zone to yourself. 🫡 Get your link: t.me/zonepaymentbot

Early — @Embervale_ • 2,000 NFT supply • Free mint • GameFi • Robinhood Chain A pixel-style farming game where you can farm, fish, gather resources and explore dungeons. Early access is live, just applied 👀 With attention slowly shifting back to GameFi, this might be one to keep on the radar.🔥 🔗 embervalegame.com

You probably use Claude and chatgpt for research, questions only. What if you could PROMPT IT to send out money? You can!! @PayBox is happy to help with that. Watch my quotes video too on how to go about it.

JESUS LOVES YOU!🫶❤️❤️❤️

You don't need to have my wallet address to send me money 😁 You can use my X handle , that's literally sweet if you asked me. Enough of using your claude and chatgpt for just research. @PayBox @moonpay , just made gifting easier. Start with my handle guys 😂😂 because I asked claude if I was broke and it just kept making me feel better.

had a major loss today got rugged on a token i bought my mistake: 'overtrading and bleeding capital chasing new pairs and liquidity rotation' i should have listened to my own advice lol gutted by this one in particular since i sized into it way more than i normally would for that kind of play but it looked very interesting and a lot of smart trenchers felt really good about it so why am i writing this? obviously not to cry publicly about losing ~$100k on a new token but to highlight a key observation after assessing my recent trades i've had a good number of losses recently, and there's one thing they all have in common: the majority were taken on borrowed conviction most of my wins this cycle have come from building my OWN conviction on something and holding/doubling down even when everyone else seems not to get it when i get complacent after having a lot of success, i often find myself taking unnecessary trades just to feel like i'm trading and in hindsight, that is ALWAYS a big mistake sometimes, the best trade is no trade going forward, i want to focus on things i have/can build MY OWN conviction on it's how i've been winning this cycle that might mean missing some very big trades that look obvious in hindsight and that's perfectly okay

I don't recommend anyone scramble to move their funds to new wallets today. But we should take the risks to cryptography from AI-accelerated math seriously, and minimize our exposure to not just quantum-vulnerable cryptography, but also potentially AI-vulnerable cryptography. The core new area of risk from this viewpoint is, unfortunately, ML-DSA / FHE / lattices. (and it's also another reason, along with quantum, why ECDSA might fall even faster than expected, hence the "fresh address" recommendation) So far most people have been in the mode of thinking "elliptic curves broken, hashes safe, lattices safe". But there is a good chance that the concrete security of lattices will take serious hits from the next two years of AI math. The basic threat model is: factoring is something that naively takes 2^(n/2) time, but over decades smart people have found and optimized number field sieves, and degraded that to 2^O(n^(1/3)), which is why RSA keys and signatures need to be ~400 bytes (and not 64 bytes). What if there are skeletons in the closet like that, both for elliptic curves and lattices, that we are simply not smart enough to discover - but bots soon will be? This is a major part of the reason why for the past year ethereum's lean roadmap has been going in the "hash-only" direction: no lattices, no ML-DSA, no Falcon, no lattice-based commitments inside ZK proofs, etc. Signatures in lean ethereum are all hash-based, either WOTS or SPHINCS-. For signatures and proofs, we already know how to go hash-only. The bigger challenge is for *public-key encryption* - and this goes far beyond blockchains. Secure communication, anonymizing protocols, lots of things need public-key encryption. And unfortunately there are long-standing mathematical theorems showing why public-key encryption cannot be done with hashes alone. You have to have some kind of trapdoor object that has at least one form of usable "structure" - either group theory (incl. isogenies) or lattices or code-based or potentially in the future even more newfangled and spooky things (local mixing?). But for anything that has structure, you should assume that AI will make at least some progress in breaking that structure. Here, one reasonable inference is that if you want to make something plausibly long-term secure, multiply the key sizes by 10. To me that's a very plausible world and something not at all extreme to predict. If AI will bring us 50 years of math in 2 years, then that 50 years of math may very plausibly include a "naive factoring -> GNFS" level of improvement to our ability to break lattices. In that world, lattices will still exist, but they will have to be significantly bigger to guarantee the same level of safety. And at those new larger sizes, hash-based constructions will beat lattice-based constructions on concrete efficiency in every use case where hash-based constructions are possible at all. Theoretically, of course it's possible that hashes are broken too (eg. P = NP would imply that). But I think P = NP is very unlikely. And intuitively, it's much more likely that a mathematical object has exactly no exploitable structure (like hashes are intended to), than that a mathematical object has exactly ~3 forms of exploitable structure (for elliptic curves: associativity, Schoof, pairings) and not some secret fourth form of structure we have not yet discovered that greatly degrades its security (for elliptic curves, ECDLP and pairing security). Similar for LWE, SVP, RLWE and the zoo of lattice problems. For this reason, we do not yet see any reason to worry and start padding the byte size of hashes (if we start to worry more, we would pad the round count first before doing anything to the byte size). Concrete TLDR, my own personal views: * Hash-based > lattice-based, in those situations where hash-based is possible at all * For anything lattice-based, be much more paranoid on param sizes. Remember that blockchains are only a small portion of the cryptography story; this point goes far beyond blockchains and applies to eg. access to websites, secure messaging, Tor / VPNs ... * For privacy protocols, strongly favor NOT putting encrypted notes onchain. Instead, send them offchain through some third-party mechanism. * If it's not difficult for you, keeping your funds in addresses which have not yet been used to make a transaction is a good idea. If it's easy for you, do it. **But be careful about migrations; I personally have lost more money in botched migrations than I have lost in all hacks combined**. * For multisig wallets, doing confirmations offchain is better than onchain, because this way the signatures of signer wallets do not get exposed to the public, so if ECDSA falls to AI much faster than expected, at least the multisig "gracefully degrades" to a 1-of-1 where the 1 is whoever was gathering the signatures - a much better place to be than "anyone can take the money" firefly.social/post/x/210783…

UPTOBER WITH ZONE BOT

my brain when it comes to taking profits