SHIELD is effectively becoming a core part of NEAR Protocol. The fact that NEAR’s real-world infrastructure now depends on Near Intents, which integrates SHIELD, is a failure. @near_intents @NEARProtocol #NEAR
30
It seems that the "Shield" system, in its current form, makes the product unviable. Relying on a system that can be taken offline for several days at any moment is madness. @near_intents @NEARProtocol
12
Unfortunately, @near_intents is not viable as a primary swap platform. Its infrastructure seems too fragile, with operations on various blockchains repeatedly being suspended. Sometimes, entire blockchains are inaccessible for days
3
240
Have you been hacked again? Trading on your platform is becoming increasingly difficult. @near_intents
17
People love jumping into coins that have already pumped. Meanwhile, ethereum:0x455e53cbb86018ac2b8092fdcd39d8444affc3f6, $OP and $ICP are ignored, even though nobody has made big multiples on them yet. Remember, your x2 is someone else's x8.
2
161
If you're a medium-term investor looking for an entry point in the crypto market, you should avoid reading trading advice on CT. Almost all of them are chasing quick trades and obsessing over the next few candles.
14
You may have already heard plenty of nonsense about the "NEAR ecosystem". So listen to me: there is no ecosystem on near:native. After years, every attempt to build one has failed. NEAR took a different path - it doesn’t need an ecosystem in the traditional sense.
1
47
600M → 540M $NEAR staked across validators. As a NEAR OG, I know the holders well: years of shame and pain have turned them into non-believers. They'll dump every bag on you. And that's exactly when $NEAR goes to $20.
1
155
Missed the $NEAR train? Look at $AURORA. Founded by Near Intents head @AlexAuroraDev, Aurora is building Intents Connect — infrastructure connecting apps to Near Intents and its cross-chain liquidity. $AURORA could be a beta play on the Intents ecosystem.
2
3
19
2,015
The problem with valuing tokens like stocks is simple: companies build value into one equity, while crypto teams often launch new products with new tokens. Future value gets fragmented. Holding one token doesn't mean you own the ecosystem's future upside.
2
50
Next time you’re in an online argument, remember this video.
204
2,569
13,980
833,945
If you buy gold as a hedge, keep in mind that in the event of a true financial Armageddon, strict government control over gold circulation will be imposed in many countries under the threat of imprisonment.
1
81
NEAR holders have given up on seeing a new ATH in price, so they’re inventing new ones — in the number of validators, HOS delegators, and Intents volume. Don’t stop, guys, keep convincing yourselves. @NEARProtocol
2
86
The exchange is a stage where a play is performed to throw you off balance. Only a fraction of the total supply ever trades — just a few percent moving from one pocket to another, shaping the price.
1
74
$NEAR - Fully unlocked. 5 years of vesting. @NEARProtocol
82
1.275 billion $NEAR tokens are in circulation, of which only 576 million are staked. This takes into account that unstaking takes about 28 hours and the annual staking yield is 9%. How are the remaining 700 million tokens distributed? @NEARProtocol
1
91
The NEAR ecosystem is a very thin market, and capital extraction is destructive for it. That’s why a story about someone making 100,000% profit on memes in NEAR is a bad story. #NEAR
43
Only 11 coins from the TOP-100 in 2025 have dropped more than NEAR. I don’t know what’s going on here, but I’ve had a long-standing suspicion that insiders don’t believe in the project. #NEAR
40
Bitcoin isn’t an untouchable financial safe haven. Its resilience depends on major network players and governments. Under political pressure, significant changes are possible.
77
The US wouldn't claim that $BTC is the future unless they were confident in controlling 15-17 million of this asset. If a dominant power is promoting a new asset, you can be sure they've been deeply invested in it for a long time.
91