Join the global campaign: No To Digital ID. Anti-Censorship and Control. “Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres inside your skull” – G. Orwell |
Global
- Tweets 3,742
- Following 2,006
- Followers 50,248
- Likes 972
No to Digital ID retweeted
UK Ofcom's "crisis protocol" mandate kicked in yesterday.
To wit, when the British government determines a "crisis" is occurring, platforms have to censor their platforms more aggressively.
None of this is constitutionally permissible in America
techtimes.com/articles/32985…
46
204
783
31,666
No to Digital ID retweeted
Think Labour blames the US government for the fact that U.S. companies are successfully resisting the UK’s Online Safety Act.
Speaking as 4chan’s lawyer, we needed no help from the U.S. government - and received none - when running rings around UK Internet regulation.
The problem with the Online Safety Act is that, in enacting it, the UK charted a collision course with the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The two rulesets are structurally incompatible, and the UK should not be surprised when U.S. firms successfully resist it. No additional formal power the UK state can apply will overcome a determined American refuser.
What should the Government do next?
Our new ThinkLabour Substack from @abbyabhaya explores the politics of protecting children, tackling online scams and holding global tech companies to account.
Read here: thinklabour.substack.com/p/t…
12
62
328
6,126
No to Digital ID retweeted
Everything You Wanted to Know About Hope Not Hate* (*But Were Afraid To Ask)
Hope Not Hate is an organisation which continuously flirts with criminality appearing to enjoy CPS immunity in the process. HNH routinely deals in the defamation of ordinary Englishmen; through its exploitation of English law it seeks to further the ambitions of the Labour Party and British censorship state by whatever means necessary. Now, its personnel are embedded in Burnham's government.
Read it here in @ReinersProject: reiners.org.uk/everything-yo…
This article presents the definitive case against the organisation, their activities over 2026 and discusses the necessary steps for de-fanging organisations like this once and for all.
5
61
152
3,746
No to Digital ID retweeted
NEW: EU Member States must create at least one Digital wallet before the end of 2026.
Via @Forbes
Made with AI
4
40
106
3,869
No to Digital ID retweeted
A disappointing u-turn from Mahmood on the ILR reforms, designed to address the Boriswave (2020-23).
Those political players wishing to address that influx in migration will now be forced to change primary law surrounding citizenship to do so.
On the ILR reforms; 'BINCA' is now necessary:
For 3 years (2020-2023) the domestic population was placed under house arrest conditions, given criminal penalty for meeting in groups, denied opportunity and the trappings of liberty and life itself in the largest suspension of 'human rights' ever witnessed in British history. Life never returned to normal.
During that time of house arrest conditions for the domestic population, who could not even enjoy air travel, over 3.9 million people were allowed to enter Britain. Many of those on farcical 'care work' visas, frequently purchased, requiring no skills to obtain – though described as 'high skill' by the then home secretary @pritipatel. A hard truth for some, lax 'legal' migration is responsible Britain's demographic terraformation and welfare tourism problem.
Half of all visa providers for care work in that time have lost the ability to provide visas at all since, either due to fraud, or simply being opportunistic visa-printers during a time of domestic crisis.
Each 'social care migrant' carries an aproximate a net economic cost of about £30,000 per individual, assuming they work. Each dependent has a net cost of around £67,000. This does not address the opportunity cost to British people, who have seen wages in the care sector undercut and compressed by this influx, and accordingly, domestic job applications ignored due to schemes which preference lower-waged foreign work visa holders – often framed as 'heroes' for their unwitting role in such wage compression. Remember dear reader, migrant workers will endure extremely low pay for two reasons:
1) The promise of unlimited welfare after ILR is required is a huge incentive, and allows them to become an anchor for dependants.
2) The work itself is largely optional, and the Home Office is astonishingly lax on this.
1
9
27
1,198
No to Digital ID retweeted
Think Labour writes an article about the hamster without understanding it
"Because these sites aren’t British, we have far less control over how they behave. We should support homegrown firms to grow."
Have you ever wondered *why* Britain has so few tech companies?
What should the Government do next?
Our new ThinkLabour Substack from @abbyabhaya explores the politics of protecting children, tackling online scams and holding global tech companies to account.
Read here: thinklabour.substack.com/p/t…
19
63
404
6,490
No to Digital ID retweeted
Everything You Wanted to Know About Hope Not Hate* (*But Were Afraid To Ask)
Hope Not Hate is an organisation which continuously flirts with criminality and appears to enjoy CPS immunity. Its exploitation of English law seeks to further the ambitions of the Labour Party by whatever means, and now, it is embedded explicitly in Burnham's government.
Read it here in @ReinersProject: reiners.org.uk/everything-yo…
26
332
768
51,130
No to Digital ID retweeted
Never underestimate the British government's eagerness to give the British government greater censorship powers.
Repeat after me, say NO to Digital ID, and the sheer desire for control which underpins it.
UK Ofcom's "crisis protocol" mandate kicked in yesterday.
To wit, when the British government determines a "crisis" is occurring, platforms have to censor their platforms more aggressively.
None of this is constitutionally permissible in America
techtimes.com/articles/32985…
9
241
666
8,137
No to Digital ID retweeted
Britain has two paths:
A) A system of digital ID, whereby your online activity & speech are tracked and used against you in the manner of a social credit system.
or..
B) A Freedom of Speech Bill, like that suggested here by @prestonjbyrne, @MCRReiners and @legalstyleblog.
You can lose your job, your livelihood or even your liberty for saying the wrong thing in Britain. Michael Reiners argues it's time to rip up the censorship rulebook and bring back free speech. dailysceptic.org/2026/11/01/…
8
135
464
8,980
No to Digital ID retweeted
"In other words, the Online Safety Act has one, and only one, genuinely good provision: it requires Ofcom to report the data showing that it doesn’t work."
techdirt.com/2026/10/26/ofco…
5
77
303
7,034
No to Digital ID retweeted
Germany’s 2026 intelligence reform, approved by the cabinet in August and at time of writing before the Bundestag, would give the BfV (the German equivalent of Mi5) powers resembling those of a domestic secret police.
These include secretly entering private homes to plant state Trojans or “neutralise” objects, remotely searching devices and deleting data, injecting false information into the communications of people under surveillance, accessing private CCTV in real time and using AI for bulk analysis and biometric matching against the open internet.
These powers breach the longstanding separation between police and intelligence services in Germany, intended to prevent the abuses associated with the Gestapo and Stasi.
Across the EU (and notably in Britain), national-security exceptions and outsourcing of intelligence functions to the charity sector are being used to expand similar powers to address “hybrid threats”, “extremism” and “disinformation”. Speech, scepticism towards scientific claims and political opposition are consequently being treated as threats to the constitutional order in European nations.
Seibt's case shows how these powers can be used, with considerable prejudice, against an individual.
Source, the Bundestag (parliament) itself: bundestag.de/dokumente/texta…
This is the reality of being under surveillance in Germany:
My phone calls were tapped.
My name appears in the domestic intelligence files >1000 times.
For what? Defending science and fighting for my country’s sovereignty.
𝕏 is the ONLY platform that allows me to share the story.
Via @Deu_Kurier
8
14
731
No to Digital ID retweeted
You can lose your job, your livelihood or even your liberty for saying the wrong thing in Britain. Michael Reiners argues it's time to rip up the censorship rulebook and bring back free speech. dailysceptic.org/2026/11/01/…
1
9
25
1,166
RT @MCRReiners: My article in @LD_Sceptics on why the various ways in which the freedom of speech is endangered in Britain.
It also looks…
1
256
No to Digital ID retweeted
Britain is no free country.
Speech is routinely punished: criminally, financially, and otherwise. This is a result of existing law, which must go.
That is the purpose of The Freedom of Speech Act (2026).
@prestonjbyrne, @legalstyleblog, @ASI
adamsmith.org/research/the-f…
24
162
588
145,795
No to Digital ID retweeted
On the Crime and Policing Act 2026:
The Act is better known as the incest and choking role-play ban – banning pornogrpahy depicting these things, with criminal penalties of up to 5 years for possessing or distributing content showing consenting adults engaging in these things.
The gambit here is that nobody will have the nerve to point the over-policing and chilling effect laws like the CPA (2026) will bring about – because they would be seen to be deviant by defending fetish content. It is all hung on the fact age play seems inappropriate – just like the OSA was sold on the basis of "protecting children" – when it was in fact a regulatory empowerment bill, giving Ofcom powers over access to the internet in Britain. That includes the doxxing requirement of government ID being required to access sites like X/Twitter.
This is no different to the compliances we saw following the Online Safety Act (2023)'s powers; where platforms over-policed and restricted information and speech outside its scope, content which patently poses no real harm to anybody.
The Crime and Policing Act 2026 (criminalising possession, circulation and production and putting this content clearly in the domain of police) and the Online Safety Act 2023 (which allows Ofcom to enforce removal against platforms) rely on the squeamishness of observers to persist.
Squeamishness – in so many realms of civic life – is truly the final frontier for Britain. Hamstrung by the domestic populace's tendency toward civility and polite avoidance. The populace will need to grit its teeth, and overcome this through demands for wide-ranging appeals to censorship laws, in order to wrest expressive freedoms back from an increasingly dystopian state.
I'm sorry but this is absolutely fucking ridiculous. I thought it was a joke.
The concept of going to prison for being in 'possession' of facesitting porn. 😭😭😭
26
62
369
42,112
No to Digital ID retweeted
Burnham's promises to scrap the scheme were hollow.
Ofcom (@Ofcom) still intend to mandate that government issued ID is shown to access the majority of sites the public uses in Britain. Essentially, doxxing every user to the government and site.
Say NO to digital ID.
Didn't take long for Burnham's pledge to scrap digital ID (@NoToDigitalID) to be revealed as entirely hollow. Showing your passport as a prerequisite to engage with the online world is still remains state policy.
The solution was never digital ID requirements (doxxing of every user) as mandatory for every internet user in the UK and her territories. In reality, the solution was not this – it was having the family computer in the living room or the kitchen, and giving your child a nokia, rather than an Android.
Standing on the graves of children and reaching for the tools of censorship will always be seen for what it is. The only antidote to the multi-faceted censorship state in Britain is low-tech approaches to parenting, and passing the @ASI Freedom of Speech Bill: adamsmith.org/research/the-f…
14
335
1,177
13,892
No to Digital ID retweeted
Didn't take long for Burnham's pledge to scrap digital ID (@NoToDigitalID) to be revealed as entirely hollow. Showing your passport as a prerequisite to engage with the online world is still remains state policy.
The solution was never digital ID requirements (doxxing of every user) as mandatory for every internet user in the UK and her territories. In reality, the solution was not this – it was having the family computer in the living room or the kitchen, and giving your child a nokia, rather than an Android.
Standing on the graves of children and reaching for the tools of censorship will always be seen for what it is. The only antidote to the multi-faceted censorship state in Britain is low-tech approaches to parenting, and passing the @ASI Freedom of Speech Bill: adamsmith.org/research/the-f…
10
108
385
19,883