Australian government admits lack of informed consent on COVID vaccines! Incredible development as NSW Health authorities quietly apologised for the lack of informed consent around COVID-19 vaccination, specifically in relation to “more than 20,000 western Sydney high school students who attended a mass Covid vaccination hub in late 2021 so they could sit” their final exams, as reported by major news outlet news.com.au. This “apology and admission, however, was not communicated to the public, but rather in a private response to a father who had opposed his two teenage daughters getting the vaccine”. Directly relevant to our ongoing legal actions! Link below.

COVID vaccine mandate-loving Democrats lying & subverting democracy. According to the left-leaning (!) New York Times, the Democrats ran a highly deceptive strategy to defeat US Senator and Republican Dan Stevens: “if the Peltola campaign or its allies could track down and persuade another Dan Sullivan to run for Senate, the confusion could cost the senator crucial votes on the state’s unusual, four-person ballot”. Apparently the “plan worked”. Link below.

Conflicts of interest in COVID vaccine research. Our favourite ‘hyperprolific’ (aka dodgy af) academics have a bone to pick with me, for exposing their little ruse, featuring me in a number of their journal submissions, though it gave me the opportunity to highlight in the same journal the many conflicts of interest in COVID-19 vaccine research. Link below.

Top medical journal BMJ surprisingly published my response to their recent article on COVID-19 vaccine pharmacovigilance failures, making the case that with these and other post-marketing surveillance failures, as well as the many issues with the clinical trials, “the safety profile has not been established”, and risk–benefit analyses “are therefore unreliable”, indicating that the vaccines should not have been “authorised, encouraged, or mandated”. Link below.

The BMJ, one of the world’s top medical journals, has published a report by Willman explaining that US health officials deployed a flawed data-mining algorithm to track mRNA COVID-19 vaccine safety, ignored internal warnings about its failure, and sidelined scientists who attempted to fix it. Incredibly, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were typically used as the background baseline for each other, so if both caused similar issues - like myocarditis - it appeared that there was no problem. It’s like how so many non-COVID vaccines aren’t tested against placebo, but against earlier versions/options. Knowing that their pharmacovigilance sucked, the authorities continued to maintain that the jabs were safe. Link below.

Research links cancer & COVID vaccines! Last year I explained how the famous Nature journal gleefully identified mechanistic links between COVID-19 and cancer, and were somehow uninterested in my response pointing out that the same applies for COVID-19 vaccines and cancer, but it’s now been published elsewhere, in dedicated cancer journal Oncotarget. Link below. And I've been targeted by some nasty and well-funded people. @Kevin_McKernan & @Jikkyleaks know what's up. It's like the powers that be are happy to let us think that effectiveness is exaggerated and myocarditis and such can happen, but cancer is just one step too far for some reason.

As we continue to be told that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, a new study (Jmii et al) provides further evidence that the spike protein, even without infection, can damage the blood-brain barrier, and the brain. The researchers “observed BBB disruption following exposure of the model to SARS-CoV-2 or spike protein”; also, “loss of BBB integrity was observed in response to luminal (mimicking ‘blood side’) or abluminal (‘brain side’) exposure to inactivated virus or spike protein”. Link below.

Westerners to migrants: Please don’t rape us. Pathetic. Maybe we, you know, don’t let rapists into our countries in the first place? Link below

Woodcock's smoking gun: Fauci Files prove COVID vaccines not safe? I explain how that latest email leak from bloody legend @SenRonJohnson is a HUGE deal. The Woodcock email to Fauci and Collins (see image) is evidence enough that the COVID-19 vaccines should not have been mandated, encouraged, or even approved for emergency use. We've got admissions that there are more adverse events than are being recorded, that the systems can't actually detect them all, and more, which ends any hope for positive risk-benefit analyses. Link below.

The truth around the COVID-19 vaccines continues to emerge with one of the top medical ethics and bioethics journals, Springer Nature’s Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, publishing two important critical articles on the jabs. The first is by Lipworth et al, a group including experts in Medicine, Bioethics, and Law, from several years back, opining that much went wrong with the vaccines’ development, recommendation, media coverage, and mandating; and the second is my just published response explaining how the emerging evidence has justified all they said and more. Link below.