Did we “nerf” Pacific by splitting it into too many regions?
On paper, maybe.
In practice, it’s more nuanced.
- In the past four years, most teams have run regional rosters even with the ability to build “superteams” across APAC. Teams naturally gravitate toward preserving their regional identities.
- You might be surprised to learn that some of our regions are actually populated enough to compete with NA and EU even if they are a single country or have a smaller number of subregions. Some of the strongest teams in VCT Pacific have come from single regions too (PRX, RRQ, FS, and of course the Korean teams). It’s not as big of a disadvantage as one might think.
- We're deliberately trying to make Cups feel more like a clash of regions, with a bit of that World Cup or Olympics vibe, rather than just another competition between international superteams.
- If we let SEA teams recruit from any country in SEA, we might as well just run one massive SEA Open since the player pool is shared universally. I don’t think this is nearly as interesting for fans as having multiple distinct region-based Opens. A consolidated SEA Open would spit out 5 or 6 teams to Cups and the competitive stakes would feel so low (i.e. become seeding matches). Plus, developing regions within SEA would be dwarfed by stronger regions and we might never see them represented at Cups. Regional diversification increases not only regional representation but also regional talent development.
With all that said, I’m certainly not naive enough to think restricting roster flexibility comes at zero competitive cost. But I think the impact is likely much smaller in practice than it looks on paper. Plus, what we gain in regional representation and diversified talent development is well worth that tradeoff.
Lastly, as always, we are willing to reassess the approach if we don’t see the intended outcome for a prolonged period. But I think this deserves a real shot. Please keep the feedback coming!