Very wise words

Talarico is lunatic left

Wow I completely missed this. Daily Wire caught Talarico on hidden video in September saying he fully intends to push the same trans policies he supported in the past. There’s no way Texas votes for this guy.

🚨 CAUGHT: James Talarico got hit with a Daily Wire hidden camera, and he admitted his TRANSGENDER policies have NOT changed. Just days after telling Fox News he would oppose biological males in girls’ sports when safety or fairness is at risk, he told a supposed supporter the opposite. “The way I fought for transgender kids in the legislature is how I will fight for them in the U.S. Senate.” “My position hasn’t changed.” He even bragged about having “the most inclusive policy” of any candidate running. Texas sees the game. VOTE PAXTON.

It’s over for Talarico Texans don’t want this crap

Talarico, 2021: “I oppose voter ID." He’s been very clear on this. Vote accordingly, Texas.

A Planned Parenthood doctor tries to lecture Matt Walsh on child gender identity and insists even babies understand gender. Then he asked her about Santa Claus, and it was over. MICHELLE FORCIER: “There’s research and data that show that babies and infants understand differences in gender. Some children figure out their gender really early...” WALSH: “Have you ever met a 4-year-old who believes in Santa Claus?” FORCIER: “Mhm.” WALSH: “So, this is someone who believes that a fat man is traveling through the sky on a flying reindeer at lightning speed coming down his chimney with presents.” FORCIER: “Yeah.” WALSH: “Would you say that this is someone who maybe has a tenuous grasp on reality?” FORCIER: “They have an appropriate 4-year-old handle on the reality that’s very real for them.” WALSH: “Agreed. Agreed. But Santa Claus is real for them, but Santa Claus is not actually real.” FORCIER: “Yeah, well, and but Santa Claus does deliver their Christmas presents.” WALSH: “Well, yeah, but he’s not real, though.” FORCIER: “To that child, they are.” WALSH: “When I see a child who, you know, believes in Santa Claus, and then let’s say this is a boy and he says, ‘I’m a girl.’ This is someone who can’t distinguish between fantasy and reality, so how could you take that as a reality?” FORCIER: “I would say that as a pediatrician and as a parent, I would say how wonderful my 4-year-old and their imagination is.” Most 4-year-olds can’t even tie their shoes. We don’t let them cross the street alone, pick their bedtime, or choose what’s for dinner. But she thinks they’re mature enough to decide they’re “in the wrong body.” The most terrifying part about this lady is that she’s also an Assistant Dean of Admissions at Brown University. She’s not just affirming fantasy as reality in her own practice. She’s helping hand-pick the next generation of doctors — ones who think just like her.

PART 2 of Setting the Record Straight on @KenPaxtonTX Now, for those of you who keep screaming... "But, but, but... Ken Paxton was impeached!"... No shit. But apparently, some of you have no idea what that means or what happened AFTER that. So let's talk about it... On May 27, 2023, the Texas House voted 121-23 to impeach Ken Paxton on 20 articles involving allegations of bribery, abuse of office, misconduct involving political donor Nate Paul, and retaliation against whistleblowers. Serious accusations indeed. But here's what some of you apparently don't understand... Impeachment IS NOT a conviction nor does it prove he committed a damn thing. The House brings the charges... but the Senate conducts the trial and determines whether the evidence warrants conviction and removal from office. And guess what? That's EXACTLY what happened. Of the 20 articles, 16 proceeded to trial. Witnesses testified... Evidence was presented... And both sides made their arguments. I watched the trial and I thought the evidence was weak. Apparently, I wasn't alone. The Senate required proof beyond a reasonable doubt and to convict Paxton on any article, 21 senators had to vote in favor. Not a SINGLE article received more than 14 votes. Not ONE. As a matter of fact, not a single article received enough votes for a simple majority. On September 16, 2023, the Texas Senate ACQUITTED Ken Paxton on all 16 articles. Now think about that for a second... Someone gets accused of wrongdoing, stands trial, evidence is presented, and they're acquitted. Yet people continue running around screaming about the accusation while conveniently leaving out the outcome. The Senate heard the case and did not convict him. You can believe the senators got it wrong. You can criticize the evidence, the witnesses, the attorneys, or the process itself. Hell, you can argue that politics influenced the outcome. But don't pretend the trial never happened. And don't confuse an accusation with a finding of guilt. We have constitutional procedures, evidentiary standards, and due process for a reason... And those protections don't suddenly become optional because you dislike the person receiving them. Paxton was impeached. He stood trial. He was acquitted. So again... if you're going to insist on judging someone by their record, then at least have the intellectual honesty to acknowledge the entire record. Not just the part that supports your bias and your argument.

I can tell you exactly what will happen if Democrats regain power: They will use your money to fly deported illegal aliens back to America and pay them settlements. They will re-open our borders and ship millions of foreign people to any community they want. And they won't stop until America becomes an unrecognizable country.