最近看过很多什么加密无用论，什么千问不用加密不是也丝滑点了奶茶。我完全的，强烈的不认同。 ​如果“Web2 够用”理论成立，那比特币早在 2009 年就该被杀死了，DeFi也不可能生长出万亿规模。 它们的成功恰恰证明了：效率不是唯一的尺度。Crypto 提供的不是替代，而是一个永远无法被剥夺的“保留选项”。 从AI的角度，这种说法也代表并不理解什么是真正的Autonomous,也不理解 Agent经济未来可能的形态和体量。试图用一套服务于人类社会的行事体系和金融系统及法律框架，去驱动未来海量的、高频交互的Agent经济和逐渐形成的Agent社会，这本身就是荒谬的。 也许加密不是唯一的选项，但一定是现有技术里最有希望的选项。 ​Agent当然需要加密，Agent只是不需要一堆骗子做的加密盘子和赌徒。

Today is the beginning. $BNC CEO @odagius at the Nasdaq podium, minutes before the Opening Bell, with @cz_binance. @BNBCHAIN

DeSci Taiwan @DeSci_Taiwan joins the ETHTaipei 2026 partner lineup. DeSci Taiwan brings together researchers, Web3 builders, and industry partners to explore decentralized science. Through meetups and workshops, the community turns ideas into practice, with topics ranging from decentralized identity and storage to AI tools for research. By creating space for people across science and technology to meet and experiment, DeSci Taiwan is helping grow the DeSci ecosystem in Taiwan. Join ETHTaipei 2026: luma.com/8z5ys4rl

Say hello to @TradePools, a new launchpad on Robinhood Chain Launch and trade now on pools.trade

✈️ GCC 机票计划再次开启了！这次我们将飞往印度🇮🇳 以太坊年度开发者大会 Devcon 8 ——11/3–6，印度孟买。 这一站紧挨着印度排灯节 Diwali，你会在一座正处于节日里的城市，遇见来自世界各地、为「自由、开放、隐私、可验证的系统」而建设的人。 GCC 资助 5 位华语 builder 飞向现场，每人 600 USDT 机票支持。 印度的签证申请周期较长，准备去的朋友们记得尽早申请～ 👉 申请链接：tally.so/r/w2025L ⏰ 申请截止时间：7/20 23:59（GMT+8）

今天腾讯大厦楼下公益装龙虾的新闻，让我想起了五年前的币圈，那时候也是像现在的AI一样，每天都有大量的新东西冒出来，根本学不完，越学越亢奋，各种DAO眼花缭乱，腾讯字节等一大堆互联网公司也是拉起了各种区块链学习群，每到周末就开讲座和沙龙，大家都觉得这就是未来。 唉，那时候真是一个美好的时代啊，币圈怎么就成现在这样了呢

Steve was an incredible leader, innovator, and friend whose world-changing ideas moved all of us forward. Celebrating his remarkable life and legacy today, on his birthday.

You do not have to agree with me on which applications are and are not corposlop to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with me on what trust assumptions are acceptable in which situations to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with me on political topics to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with my views on defi, decentralized social or privacy-preserving payments to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with my views on AI to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with my view that Berlin has the best food in Europe, suits and ties should be expunged from our culture, and YYYY-MM-DD is the best date format to use Ethereum. And you do not have to agree with me on any one of those above things to agree with me on any other. I do not claim to represent the whole Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum is a decentralized protocol. The whole concept of "permissionlessness" and "censorship resistance" is that you are free to use Ethereum in whatever way you want, without caring about what I think, or even what anyone else in the Ethereum Foundation or even any Ethereum client developer thinks. But on the flipside, if I say that your application is corposlop, I am not "censoring" you. This has always been the flip side of the grand bargain of free speech: I am not free to shut you down, but I am free to criticize you, much as you are free to criticize me. In fact, it is *necessary* that we do this. The modern world does not call out for pretend neutrality, where a person puts on a suit and claims to be equally open to all perspectives from all of humanity and not have their own opinions. Neutrality is for protocols (like HTTP, like Bitcoin, like Ethereum), and neutrality within some scope is for some institutions. The modern world calls out for the courage to clearly state one's principles - including stating principles by pointing to negative examples, that is by criticizing the things in the world that are incompatible with one's principles - and work with those with aligned goals to build the metaverse within which those principles are taken as a baseline. Such things inherently cannot be constrained to just the layer of the protocol: any principle you have will naturally lead to conclusions, not just about how the protocol should be built, but also what should be built upon it. Furthermore, any such principle will have consequences that go beyond technology, and reach into specific questions within the larger social world. This should not be avoided. Valuing something like "freedom", and then acting as though it has consequences on technology choices, but is completely separate from everything else about our lives, is not pragmatic - it is hollow. The inevitable converse of this is that (i) a decentralized protocol must not be viewed as belonging to only one metaverse, and (ii) the borders of a metaverse are fuzzy: it is possible, and indeed it is the normal case, to align with any one on some axes and not on other axes. Linux is a technology of user empowerment and freedom, Linux is also the base layer of a lot of the world's corposlop. It's almost certainly the base layer of many things that I think are good, and you think are bad, and vice versa. Hence, if you care about Linux because you care about user empowerment and freedom, it is not enough to just build the kernel, we must also build a full-stack ecosystem compatible with those values, and explicitly accept that this is not the only way that people will use Linux, but it is one way that must be built and must be available. Ethereum is similar. Milady.