Save on your API bill this Halloween 🎃💸 Treat yourself to a 0% markup on all AI models! Build with Jev, Claude, GPT, DeepSeek, Grok, Veo, Seedance and 1000+ other models without paying extra $$$.. Claim zero markup -> aimlapi.com. First 100 commenters will get a promo code for free credits!

Introducing Jev Router for Agentic Tools ⚡ 1. Connect your agent to 10,000+ tools and models in one MCP 2. @TypesafeAI’s Jev picks the best for your task 3. Result is 96% cheaper than Claude! Try it with zero markup now > aimlapi.com/mcp First 100 commenters will get a $10 promo code as early adopters!

GPT 6.1-Terra beats Opus 5.5 at 4.5x lower price in 3D McDonald's 🍔 We had models recreate McDonalds with Trump serving burgers in. Both ran at medium effort, with Terra finishing in 40 min, Opus - 83. Run GPT 6.1-Terra > aimlapi.com

Claude can crawl Reddit now! It just found TOP-5 trends in 1 min💥 We connected AI/ML API to Claude, and it analyzed 2,070,097 upvotes to find what's trending. It was 110x faster than a browser MCP, for just $0.26 totalю Crawl Reddit with your AI agent > aimlapi.com/mcp

Kimi K3.1 Pro is the new Opus 5.5 but 3.5x cheaper Both models made Jensen Huang's robo-ducks. Opus took 3 hours, Kimi did it in 1 at a much lower price Run Kimi K3.1 Pro on aimlapi.com

MiniMax M3.1 Flash mogs Muse and DeepSeek for FREE 🔥 Try Space Bunny on aimlapi.com

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 actually cooked GPT-Luna 🐋 We tested both models in a 3D whale breach. Try it on aimlapi.com

Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D: the quality is not there yet... Same prompt for both. Argon is 5.6x times cheaper, but there's a lot to be improved Both models run via aimalpi.com

Muse Wonder moggs Opus 5.5 at 2.6x lower price Same 3D physics scenes prompt for both models. Try Muse Wonder on aimlapi.com

Haiku 5.5 draws Mona Lisa in Google Sheets run via aimlapi.com

Nano Banana 2.1 is cheaper and 5x faster than GPT Images we tested the new Nano Banana model against GPT images with the same prompt and 5 images numbers: • Nano Banana 2.1: $0.044/image, rendering in 11 seconds • GPT Images 2.5: $0.069/image, rendering in 50 seconds Both models run via aimlapi.com

Ling-3.1-flash by @AntLingAGI is live on AI/ML API ⚡ 560B MoE with ~25B active per token. Up to 1M context. Built for agents, coding and long documents. Free to try until October 13 on aimlapi.com

Introducing the LiquidRouter. We experimented with the @liquidai's d1 classifier model, and came up with a router that saves up to 80% of your LLM costs. It rates every of your prompt's difficulty and sends it to the right model: low-cost models for easy work, top models for hard work.

GPT-6.1 built Super Mario Bros for $4.17 In 50 minutes we recreated the Super Mario Bros in 3D with the newest OpenAI model try GPT-6.1 Sol on aimlapi[.]com

Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna at Fruit Ninja: 57x price difference 🤯 same prompt, same rules, 1 shot. cost: Claude Sonnet 5.5 - $2.86 5.5 GPT-6 Luna - $0.05 what we saw: Sonnet drew the game closer to the original, but Luna did it 3x faster and 57x cheaper. Try both models on aimlapi.com

Opus 5.5 beats Jev and GPT-6 Sol in 3 moves: Rubik’s Cube race We made 4 models run with same limits for all: 20 moves or 5 minutes. Every move = 1 API call. Results: Opus 5.5: solved in 1m 12.87s with the perfect 3 moves GPT-6 Sol: wrong first move, out of time after 4 moves Jev: 20 moves in 20 seconds, ran out of moves Laya: 20 moves in 9.5s, ran out of moves Opus, GPT, and Jev ran via aimlapi.com, Laya ran locally.

Space Bunny performs TERRIBLE in physics 💀 we tested Space Bunny against GLM 5.3 in a task with a single focus scenes: an explosion in a desert, a tornado, a balloon pop, a water drop fall, and the Newton’s cradle here’s what we got: - the Newton’s cradle is where GLM 5.3 totally cooked Space Bunny - water drop and tornado were the worst, neither of the models handled it price: Space Bunny: free GLM 5.3: $0.40 try it with aimlapi.com

Opus 5.5 absolutely beats GPT-6 Sol in 3D Despite being 13x more expensive than GPT-6 Sol, the high quality of Opus 5.5 is undeniable! cost: GPT-6 Sol: $0.34 Claude Opus 5.5: $4.37 Try both on aimlapi.com

Grok 4.7 beats Opus 5 at 10× lower price! the test: four self-contained three.js space scenes: a night rocket launch with fire and smoke, an alien mothership lasering incoming meteors, a rotating spiral galaxy, a black hole swallowing planets and stars cost: Grok 4.7: $0.20 Claude Opus 5: $2.05 what we saw: • Grok is faster on 3 of 4 scenes, galaxy and black hole in about 60 seconds each, while opus needed 1.5–3 minutes per scene • every Grok's scene fully built: launch pad with moon, ringed planet behind the mothership, spinning galaxy, black hole with planets falling in try Grok 4.7 on aimlapi[.]com

Introducing the AI chess tournament: USA vs China In 14 days we'll know which country and which model are best at the game Details below 👇

Jev VS Fable 5.1 VS GPT-6 Astra: chess typesafe's new Jev V13 isn't an LLM. it doesn't chat, doesn't explain, doesn't write code — it only makes decisions. so we made it play blitz against frontier LLMs. the test: 5+0 blitz. every move is one API call. Jev V13 vs Fable 5.1: • fable outplayed it. by move 29 it was +16 in material and even promoted a second queen • but it kept burning 6-15 seconds per move on analysis. jev answered in ~2.6s • so fable didn't have enough time and lost Jev V13 vs Astra: • astra didn't bother winning on material. it mated jev in 18 moves. Qe1#, with 2:27 to spare

Union Alpha cooked Ox Alpha for FREE we put Union Alpha against Ox Alpha on 3D generation. the task: generate a 3D robot army assault on a megapolis Union Alpha: 44,358 tokens, FREE Ox Alpha: 127,064 tokens, $0.57 • union fires hundreds of converging beams that slice a tower apart mid-frame, the most cinematic shot of the whole run • union needed 3× fewer tokens for the same briefs: it writes the code instead of thinking try Union Alpha for free on aimlapi[.]com

this ad with flies cost $15 and took 20 minutes to make.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash at 3D geometry test: six self-contained three.js stereometry scenes — a (3,8) torus knot, a Klein bottle, a great stellated dodecahedron, a hyperboloid ruled by 120 straight rods, a level-3 Menger sponge, a thick Möbius strip. one shot each, no libraries beyond three.js, every surface painted with a live iridescent rainbow that has to crawl across the geometry. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.11 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash — $0.27 • gemini delivers all six figures for 2.4× less — 21k output tokens against deepseek's 168k • gemini is 5× faster — every scene under 25 seconds, deepseek took up to 3 minutes on the Möbius strip • deepseek wins the torus knot: its rope is vivid and glossy, while gemini rendered the same knot nearly black • neither model can build a real Klein bottle. both hand back a twisted tube and call it done try both on aimlapi[.]com

here's the result with the old model GPT-5.4 Image 2

GPT Images 2.5 beats Nano Banana Pro on detail and color the test: five one-shot image prompts, identical text for both models — a crab scoring through a ring of fire at sea, a cat devouring galaxies, a girl with a laser cannon vs giant octopuses, a crocodile fighting a hot dog army in a rainbow valley, a giant banana with laser eyes leveling a metropolis. one generation each, no retries, no cherry-picking. interesting: • gpt packs every frame with detail — individual droplets on the crab's shell, hundreds of hot dog soldiers in one shot, debris flying off every collapsing tower • gpt's colors just hit harder — deeper saturation, hotter fire, real neon in the laser beams

GPT Astra built a Rocket League clone for $25 Astra wrote the entire game in @threejs — no engine, no assets, no human-written code the result 👇

GPT Astra just cooked Claude Fable 5.1 — for a lower price! OpenAI just rolled out GPT‑6 Astra — we put it against Anthropic's Fable 5.1 Both models got the same four briefs: Earth colliding with Mars, a tall ship sucked into a giant whirlpool, Godzilla leveling downtown, a mega-tsunami swallowing a city. One self-contained HTML file per scene, one shot, no edits. GPT Astra: 25,159 tokens, $1.67 Claude Fable 5.1: 37,767 tokens, $2.51 both models live on aimlapi[.]com — 1000+ models, one key.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs 1.2: sculpt viking figurines @AIatMeta dropped Muse Spark 1.3 today — we ran it against Muse Spark 1.2 both models got the same brief: three collectible 3D figurines — a viking helmet, a diamond-studded axe, a longship with a crew — one self-contained HTML file each, one shot. Muse Spark 1.3: 22,474 tokens, $0.10 Muse Spark 1.2: 19,324 tokens, $0.08

Gemini Flash 3.8 beats Opus 5 at at 15× lower price the test: four self-contained three.js physics scenes — a balloon popped by a needle, a ball dropping into water, a bomb with a mushroom cloud, a live atom model. 5 seconds each, real gravity, real impact. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.12 Claude Opus 5 — $1.86 what we saw: • gemini passes the same physics checklist for 15× less — the ball sinks and bobs, ripples spread, the mushroom towers over the scene • gemini is 4× faster — every scene generated in under 70 seconds. opus took up to 5 minutes try Gemini 3.8 Flash on aimlapi[.]com

Fable 5.1 charges 6× more than GPT-5.6 Sol anthropic's Fable 5.1 went live. we threw it straight at openai's GPT-5.6 Sol. same prompts, one shot. the test: five self-contained three.js scenes, one continuous project — a futuristic mansion on a private island. exterior orbit, grand hall with a diamond chandelier, pool with a water park, garage with 10 lambos, helicopter landing on the roof cost: Claude Fable 5.1 — $5.69 GPT-5.6 Sol — $0.88 what we saw: • fable goes for realism — waves, depth, a sand ring around the island. sol goes low-poly and clean, and its style never breaks across all 5 scenes • fable's chandelier is thousands of individual crystals. sol's hall is honestly just a staircase and a wall • fable's helicopter touches down on the lit helipad much smoother than sol's • fable built a triple-slide water-park tower — and shipped the pool with no water. sol's park is tiny — but the pool is full 6× the price buys you 6× the detail — and the same one-shot bugs. what's your choice? try Fable 5.1 on aimlapi[.]com

GLM-5.3 FLASH VS CLAUDE 4.6 OPUS VS HY4 We gave GLM-5.3 Flash, Claude 4.6 Opus and Tencent's Hy4 the exact same prompt - generate the Backrooms with a monster. Cost: GLM-5.3 Flash: $0.03 Hy4 preview: $0.13 Claude 4.6 Opus: $0.29 Try all three models on aimlapi[.]com

you can now do incredible things with Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

GLM-5.3 FLASH VS GEMINI 3.7 FLASH — 11X CHEAPER The recently revealed Ox Alpha model has been identified as GLM-5.3 Flash. We benchmarked it against Gemini 3.7 Flash. Objective: Generate three complex disaster scenes, each as a single, self-contained Three.js file, using a single prompt per scene. Scenarios: A tsunami destroying a city, Earth colliding with Mars, and a whirlpool sinking a ship. Total Cost: GLM-5.3 Flash: $0.03 Gemini 3.7 Flash: $0.33 Who won?

NEW OX ALPHA FEELS CRAZY 🤯 We asked Ox Alpha to build a dreamcore 3D world in three.js — one prompt, one shot. No assets or edits — all procedural code from a single response. 64,745 tokens. And it was absolutely FREE! Try Ox Alpha for FREE on aimlapi{.}com

GLM-5.3 beat GPT-5.6 SOL at 3D @Zai_org 's GLM-5.3 vs OpenAI's GPT-5.6 SOL, both through one API (aimlapi[.]com) the test: one self-contained three.js file rendering Godzilla destroying a night megacity — 150+ lit skyscrapers, real physics on collapsing buildings, then eye lasers carving the skyline. 18-second loop cost: GLM-5.3 — $0.37 GPT-5.6 SOL — $0.44 what we saw: • GLM's destruction is the real deal — towers fracture into chunks that tumble, pile up and burn. • GLM's Godzilla actually looks like a Godzilla — dark scales, weighty walk, menacing silhouette. SOL shipped a smooth pale toy • GLM packed the frame — dense city, glowing windows, moon, fires everywhere. SOL's city is sparser and flatter

GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.2: build your own landing page @Zai_org says their new model is built to code — so we ran a head-to-head. Both models got the exact same brief: build a landing page for yourself, one self-contained HTML file each. The typing terminal, the springy benchmark charts, the working tabs and FAQ, the 3D backgrounds — all their own code. No frameworks, no templates. GLM-5.3: 161,971 tokens, $0.80. GLM-5.2: 197,853 tokens, $0.98.

Qwen 3.8 27B beat Claude Opus 4.6 for $0 open-weights Qwen 3.8 27B on one rented GPU vs anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6. same prompt, no edits the test: one self-contained three.js file rendering sunken Atlantis — temple, columns, boid fish, kelp, bubbles, god rays, caustics — plus a 20-second camera flythrough cost: Qwen 3.8 27B — free (open weights, self-hosted) Claude Opus 4.6 — $0.21 what we saw: • qwen actually built a temple — full colonnade, domed roof, glowing portal centered. opus made a long row of columns fading into fog • qwen's portal is the star of the shot. opus leaves it small and off to the side • qwen packed more into frame — fish, kelp, ruins layered together. opus spreads thin and empty qwen's weights are on hugging face — you can run this one yourself!

A Rolex for $0.038 from Gemini 3.7 👀 We gave Google's new Gemini 3.7 one prompt: model a gold luxury watch in pure three.js — fluted bezel, sunburst dial, date window, sweeping seconds hand. No assets, no textures, no edits. Everything you see is procedural geometry from a single response. Total cost: $0.038. The full rotation is in the video!

Grok 4.6 just made Opus look expensive! We ran a real-world benchmark: Grok 4.6 and Claude Opus 5 one-shotted three 3D scenes of @elonmusk 's TERAFAB megafactory in three.js - the exterior at dusk, the cleanroom fab floor, and the central operations hall with walking workers. No edits, straight from the API. Both delivered working code on the first try. But the economics aren't close: Grok 4.6 - $0.38 Claude Opus 5 - $2.06 That's 5.4x cheaper for comparable output - and Grok also spent noticeably fewer tokens per scene. At demo scale that's pennies, at production volume it's the difference in your monthly bill!

NVIDIA's new 3B model just turned coffee stains into planets Nemotron 3.5 Lightning dropped today: a 30B mixture-of-experts model with only 3B active parameters, a 1M-token context window, and open weights. NVIDIA claims up to 4x faster output than competing models in its class — light enough to run on a single GPU! We put it through our napkin benchmark: the model gets a photo of a napkin with three coffee ring stains and one prompt — turn the stains into an animated drawing, one self-contained HTML file. Output: 9,600 tokens The model read the position and size of every stain and drew a planet exactly over each ring — one with orbiting moons, one with an asteroid field, one big and glowing. Then it added a pencil that sketches them in, stroke by stroke. No missed rings, no misaligned circles — the stains became the planets Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is already live on aimlapi{.}com for FREE

Muse Glimmer one-shot 5 games! @AIatMeta dropped Muse Glimmer. So we ran it against Muse Spark 1.2, on five one-file game demos, each one written to play itself: Tetris, a top-down pixel street race, a rooftop web-slinger, a blue hedgehog platformer, and Flappy Bird. the setup: • Muse Glimmer 30B — via aimlapi[.]com. cost: $0.02 • Muse Spark 1.2 — via aimlapi[.]com. cost: $0.11 what we saw: • every Glimmer scene runs and plays itself. it's a reasoning model, so it burns more tokens — but the output is clean. its Tetris even scores each placement to keep lines clearing, and the blocks burst into pixels on every clear. • Glimmer beat Spark at Flappy Bird — its bird flew through the pipes cleaner. • but it's not perfect: in the racing game its cars sometimes slip off the road, and its graphics are simpler and blockier than Spark's. glad to see Meta back in open source — and we're waiting for Spark 1.2 weights next 🙌

insane stuff

Seedance 2.5 just cooked Veo 3.1 – for half the price! to celebrate, we're giving away $10 in api credits to 20 of you to try seedance 2.5 – just rt/qrt this post, winners will be picked randomly on August 10 @BytePlusGlobal 's seedance 2.5 just dropped. we ran it with google's Veo 3.1 and honestly, it wasn't much of a fight the test: 5 prompts, one shot each, 4s, 720p, native audio, same exact prompt to both models: a tornado grinding through downtown, a tsunami swallowing a megacity, slow-mo liquid physics, a 180° camera orbit, and a neon sign with text cost for the 5 clips: Seedance 2.5 – $6.08 ($1.21 per clip) Veo 3.1 – $10.40 ($2.08 per clip) observations: • seedance is 42% cheaper and it's the better one. • seedance keeps geometry locked through the orbit shot – buildings, the cellist, the station all stay solid. • disaster scenes are the closest call: veo throws more debris, seedance stages the shot better. same prompts, almost half the price, better result. bytedance shipped a monster – and it's live on aimlapi[.]com!

yes! grok is cooking

yeah! that's peak

great video! LFG team

Ling-3.0-tiny by @AntLingAGI is live on AI/ML API ⚡️ ZeroDay support, free for everyone until August 13. Explore: aimlapi.com

yes!