f*ck YES, Opus 5.5 + these 10 repos = your own motion design studio with zero competition
an animated character, flying interfaces, camera moves and a finished film.
steal the 10-step blueprint ↓
(1/10) / spec-kit → turn the idea into a brief + shot plan
github.com/github/spec-kit
(2/10) / Penpot → design the boards, palette and typography
github.com/penpot/penpot
(3/10) / SVG.js → build the ribbons, paths and vector assets
github.com/svgdotjs/svg.js
(4/10) / Blender MCP → connect Claude Code to the scene
github.com/ahujasid/mcp-for-…
(5/10) / Blender → build the studio, character and rig; export GLB
github.com/blender/blender
(6/10) / glTF Transform → inspect and optimize the exported assets
github.com/donmccurdy/glTF-T…
(7/10) / gltfjsx → turn the GLB into editable React components
github.com/pmndrs/gltfjsx
(8/10) / React Three Fiber → stage the character path + camera
github.com/pmndrs/react-thre…
(9/10) / Remotion → sequence the scene, titles and sound
github.com/remotion-dev/remo…
(10/10) / FFmpeg → encode, inspect and ship the MP4
github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg
the loop:
brief → assets → scene → animation → preview → refine → export
keep studio.blend editable. drive the Remotion animation with useCurrentFrame().
save this, then read the full guide for Opus 5.5 Motion Engineering ↓
Opus 5.5 can run a whole motion design studio
Sell a 20-second launch clip built from real product screens
Copy the motion engineering prompts and delivery process
Build your offer before the next product launch ↓
switching AI agents shouldn't mean pasting your entire backstory again
Fulcra gives connected agents a shared context backend for your files, notes and agent work
→ a research agent leaves its findings
→ a build agent picks up the relevant context
→ you can change tools and keep the work you've already accumulated
you can inspect updates, trace what changed and revoke an agent's access
for a launch workflow, I'd keep the brief, research and decisions together, then let each authorized agent contribute back. the next agent gets a useful starting point, and you still have a record you can review
that handoff is what interests me here. better models are useful; having to rebuild the brief for every tool gets old
connect through Fulcra's MCP server or supported agent skills. the connections and permissions still need setting up
5 GB free to start ↓
switching AI agents shouldn't mean pasting your entire backstory again
Fulcra gives connected agents a shared context backend for your files, notes and agent work
→ a research agent leaves its findings
→ a build agent picks up the relevant context
→ you can change tools and keep the work you've already accumulated
you can inspect updates, trace what changed and revoke an agent's access
for a launch workflow, I'd keep the brief, research and decisions together, then let each authorized agent contribute back. the next agent gets a useful starting point, and you still have a record you can review
that handoff is what interests me here. better models are useful; having to rebuild the brief for every tool gets old
connect through Fulcra's MCP server or supported agent skills. the connections and permissions still need setting up
5 GB free to start ↓
this is f*cking insane...
a guy reverse-engineered a smart home app and gave Claude Code control of his house
now Claude drafts a floor plan from his device names, and a web page turns it into a 3D model with live device states
open a real door → the door in the model opens. tap a camera → live video from that room
here's how it works step by step:
step 1 → his tool, tolpo, finds the Tapo lights, plugs, sensors and cameras on his local network
step 2 → an MCP server connects them to Claude, so he can ask things like "dim the office lights" or "is any door open?"
step 3 → Claude reads the device names and guesses which rooms they belong to. it understands room names in English, German and Spanish
step 4 → it drafts a floor plan. he corrects the rooms and layout before saving it
step 5 → a local web page draws the house in 3D and puts each device in its room
step 6 → every device shows its live state, so he can see what's happening around the house
step 7 → door sensors drive the model: open the physical door, and its virtual version opens too
step 8 → tap a camera to watch it live. before video starts, tolpo checks the camera's privacy switch
under the hood:
→ device control runs directly over his LAN, without TP-Link's cloud in the middle
→ it authenticates with his own Tapo account
→ he tested it on his own bulbs, plug, hub, sensors, doorbell and cameras
→ most of the project was built with Claude Code, including the protocol research
prompt + tool to set up your own version in the first reply ↓
REA is most dangerous thing on the internet right now...
It lets your AI agent reverse engineer any app, down to the binary
If you use it correctly, you can rebuild any feature you pay for, for FREE
In this article, I show you how:
This is f*cking insane. SpaceXAI engineer Lauren Tan (ex-Cursor):
"99% of people use GrokBot for 1% of what it can do. They run one agent without /loops + /graphs
I run a team of 65+ GrokBot agents. By 9 a.m. my Chief of Staff has the day planned, my PM has handed out the work, and the workers have shipped half of it"
In this 1-hour session, SpaceXAI engineer shows how to build that team from scratch
GrokBot → Chief of Staff → PM → Workers → /Loops → Self-Improving Team
A /loop sends every task back until it actually works
A /graph lets one agent hand its result to the next without you in the middle
Anyone can ask GrokBot a question, almost nobody gives it a team to run
Worth more than most $2250 agentic engineering courses
Watch it today
Then read the article below on building your own self-improving GrokBot system ↓
Founders using Grok Bot are already one step ahead of you
Give your one-person company an AI workforce
Reduce routine outsourcing and reclaim founder time
Copy the full Grok Bot harness below ↓
this is f*cking insane...
a guy reverse-engineered a smart home app and gave Claude Code control of his house
now Claude drafts a floor plan from his device names, and a web page turns it into a 3D model with live device states
open a real door → the door in the model opens. tap a camera → live video from that room
here's how it works step by step:
step 1 → his tool, tolpo, finds the Tapo lights, plugs, sensors and cameras on his local network
step 2 → an MCP server connects them to Claude, so he can ask things like "dim the office lights" or "is any door open?"
step 3 → Claude reads the device names and guesses which rooms they belong to. it understands room names in English, German and Spanish
step 4 → it drafts a floor plan. he corrects the rooms and layout before saving it
step 5 → a local web page draws the house in 3D and puts each device in its room
step 6 → every device shows its live state, so he can see what's happening around the house
step 7 → door sensors drive the model: open the physical door, and its virtual version opens too
step 8 → tap a camera to watch it live. before video starts, tolpo checks the camera's privacy switch
under the hood:
→ device control runs directly over his LAN, without TP-Link's cloud in the middle
→ it authenticates with his own Tapo account
→ he tested it on his own bulbs, plug, hub, sensors, doorbell and cameras
→ most of the project was built with Claude Code, including the protocol research
prompt + tool to set up your own version in the first reply ↓
REA is most dangerous thing on the internet right now...
It lets your AI agent reverse engineer any app, down to the binary
If you use it correctly, you can rebuild any feature you pay for, for FREE
In this article, I show you how:
Full prompt:
You are my build partner. Help me connect my TP-Link Tapo smart home devices to Claude using tolpo, then set up a live 3D view of my home. Work step by step, explain each step simply, and ask before installing anything.
PROJECT
github.com/signerless/tolpo
Read the current documentation first. Use the existing project and check which features work with my device models.
GOAL
I can ask Claude to control my lights and check my sensors in plain English. A local web page shows a 3D model of my home, with each device in its room and its current state. When a door sensor reports open, the door opens in the model. Clicking an enabled camera shows its live video.
HOW IT CONNECTS
My computer and Tapo devices are on the same local network.
tolpo authenticates using my own Tapo account and talks directly to supported devices over the LAN.
Claude connects to tolpo through its MCP server.
tolpo's local web server displays the 3D house in my browser.
PIPELINE
Step 1: check my operating system, installed software and Tapo device models. Tell me what's supported, what hasn't been tested and what I need to install.
Step 2: help me configure credentials locally, then run a read-only scan. List the devices found and flag anything unreachable.
Step 3: connect tolpo to Claude. Test reading device states with questions like "which lights are on?" and "is any door open?"
Step 4: after I approve, test one light: switch it on, change its brightness, then restore its original state.
Step 5: draft a floor plan from the device names. Infer room names in English, German or Spanish where supported. Ask me to correct room assignments, dimensions and positions before saving.
Step 6: open the local 3D dashboard. Check that devices appear in the right rooms and that their displayed states match the physical devices.
Step 7: help me enable only the cameras I choose. Check privacy mode before opening video, and verify playback in the dashboard.
Step 8: test a door sensor and a light against the 3D view. Check how the dashboard reports an unreachable device.
PRIVACY AND CONTROL RULES (hard)
Keep passwords and tokens out of chat and the repository. Guide me through entering them locally.
Start read-only. Ask before changing device states or settings.
Respect camera privacy mode. Never disable it automatically.
Explain which device data or camera images would be sent to Claude. Local device communication does not mean the AI model runs locally.
Start with step 1: ask which operating system and Tapo devices I have, then tell me what software and accounts I need.
Stop letting unfinished Opus 5.5 runs eat your budget
Set up the harness before your next long task
Save progress, verify results, reuse the workflow
The full 7-layer setup below ↓
Stop letting unfinished Opus 5.5 runs eat your budget
Set up the harness before your next long task
Save progress, verify results, reuse the workflow
The full 7-layer setup below ↓
Anthropic just released new agent guide: make every subagent earn its own context
steal this 18-role blueprint for turning Opus 5.5 into an entire engineering team
PLAN → TOOLS → RESULTS → REVISE
one main loop keeps the goal, plan and evidence
→ procedures become skills
→ API actions become tools
→ reference material loads when needed
keep separate workers for fresh parallel research, independent verification or a measured context/tool boundary
merge roles that repeatedly share data. compare each fold on the same end-to-end tasks and inspect what breaks
official migration kit:
> git clone github.com/anthropics/single…
copy its skill/ folder to .claude/skills/single-agent-loop/
then in Claude Code:
Run the single-agent-loop skill
18 roles in the map. evidence decides which ones need their own loop
save this, then read the full guide for Opus 5.5 Harness Engineering ↓
Stop letting unfinished Opus 5.5 runs eat your budget
Set up the harness before your next long task
Save progress, verify results, reuse the workflow
The full 7-layer setup below ↓
Anthropic engineer:
“Anthropic hired me at $350K–$850K because I know how to build harnesses for multi-agent systems
99% of people still hand-roll multi-agent systems and wonder why they break.
I build systems that run loops + sandbox tools + turn yesterday’s logs into new skills — same model, 10x more reliable agents that keep improving overnight.”
Opus 5.5 → Agents → Harness → Loops → Graphs
In a short workshop, he shows exactly how to build one from scratch.
step 1 → harness handles loops, context, and sandboxing
step 2 → brain and hands separated — 60% faster to first token
step 3 → runs server-side, resumes from the log after crashes
step 4 → failure is cheap — retry and replay instead of starting over
step 5 → yesterday’s logs become new memory — the system wakes up smarter
Anthropic calls this “dreaming”.
Most people spend weeks building this by hand.
You don’t have to.
Bookmark and watch it.
Then read the article below ↓
Opus 5.5 can run a whole motion design studio
Sell a 20-second launch clip built from real product screens
Copy the motion engineering prompts and delivery process
Build your offer before the next product launch ↓
THIS IS F*CKING INSANE
Opus 5.5 just replaced Pixar
It's f*cking insane…
Drop the PDF below into Opus 5.5, thank me later
Then read the full guide on motion design in the article below ↓
Opus 5.5 can run a whole motion design studio
Sell a 20-second launch clip built from real product screens
Copy the motion engineering prompts and delivery process
Build your offer before the next product launch ↓
Anthropic just released new agent guide: make every subagent earn its own context
steal this 18-role blueprint for turning Opus 5.5 into an entire engineering team
PLAN → TOOLS → RESULTS → REVISE
one main loop keeps the goal, plan and evidence
→ procedures become skills
→ API actions become tools
→ reference material loads when needed
keep separate workers for fresh parallel research, independent verification or a measured context/tool boundary
merge roles that repeatedly share data. compare each fold on the same end-to-end tasks and inspect what breaks
official migration kit:
> git clone github.com/anthropics/single…
copy its skill/ folder to .claude/skills/single-agent-loop/
then in Claude Code:
Run the single-agent-loop skill
18 roles in the map. evidence decides which ones need their own loop
save this, then read the full guide for Opus 5.5 Harness Engineering ↓
Stop letting unfinished Opus 5.5 runs eat your budget
Set up the harness before your next long task
Save progress, verify results, reuse the workflow
The full 7-layer setup below ↓
holy f*ck, Opus 5.5 just killed 3D designers jobs...
Opus 5.5 + Blender = your own animation studio that prints $$$
one idea → a scene where every movement triggers the next
the stack:
01 / Opus 5.5 + Blender MCP
github.com/ahujasid/mcp-for-… → build and inspect the scene
02 / Blender
blender.org/features/simulat… → physics, keyframes and camera
03 / Remotion + FFmpeg
remotion.dev/docs/ai/skillsffmpeg.org/ → edit, sound and export
the harness:
brief → event graph → scene → preview → fix → checkpoint → export
keep the event timings in one file. save the editable scene after each approved change.
connect Claude Code:
`claude mcp add blender uvx mcp-for-blender`
`uvx mcp-for-blender install-addon`
requires Blender + uv. enable the addon in Blender and start its server
the visual maps this workflow around the reference clip
save this, then read the full guide for Opus 5.5 Motion Engineering ↓
Opus 5.5 can run a whole motion design studio
Sell a 20-second launch clip built from real product screens
Copy the motion engineering prompts and delivery process
Build your offer before the next product launch ↓
Introducing Fompt Feed to answer the burning question, what do I do with these agents?
Steal the billionaire’s Fo prompts, give your self-help books an execute button or copy your impressive(?) friends.
- for the curious, @vkhosla’s life hacks.
- for entrepreneurs and small businesses, @tferriss's delegation playbook, @JamesClear's habits.
- for job seekers @AliAbdaal's strategies.
- for parents, Emily Oyster and @GoodInside's hacks
- your friends's funny fompts,
- your mom's "i can't believe you did this" fompt.
Meet the Fo feed.
You’ve spent enough time watching other people have their shit together.
Your turn to become a frompter ↓ (the top creator earns $10k this week)