We don't like Epic Games Launcher because: it sucks doesn't have a proper profile page doesn't have customization doesn't have a good UI doesn't have a review system doesn't have a workshop doesn't have a good achievement system doesn't have profile backgrounds doesn't have custom profile pictures (in the same way as Steam) doesn't have enough social features doesn't have a good chat system doesn't have a community hub doesn't have user reviews doesn't have a proper modding system doesn't have a great library layout doesn't have enough features compared to Steam doesn't have a good reputation forces exclusivity deals keeps running in the background makes downloading games a pain gives away free games but still feels worse than Steam tries too hard to compete with Steam instead of improving the launcher

Wtf 🤬- No HDR in The Blood Of Dawnwalker on PC, PS5 or SS/SX. I hate that we get so many Unreal Engine 5 games without HDR support. That was an easy game to make HDR analysis for😒 Being an Unreal Engine 5 game, we should be able to use the RenoDX UE Extended version to get good HDR into the game. But at this moment it doensn't work properly.

After all the controversy about NVIDIA’s DLSS 5 being a terrible AI slop, I played around a bit with the leaked DLSS5 version in KCD2. First off—what was leaked isn’t even remotely what NVIDIA originally presented. It doesn’t alter the geometry of the models or the appearance of the characters in any way. I repeat: It doesn’t alter the geometry of the models or the appearance of the characters in any way! What it does is take existing normal maps and create much better skin texture and facial detail (examples 6 and 2) than the lighting model in the game. It also looks a bit like an attempt at subsurface scattering and other advanced skin rendering techniques. But sceptics could say, that its just a fancy version of clarity and dehaze filters which have very similar effect. I often criticized the character artists’ work when certain faces in the game looked lacking in detail and plasticity, and they’d often show me that it looked fine on their computers and that the problem was with the lighting in the game. Well, now it looks right in the game, too! This is how those faces were supposed to look. The AI isn’t making anything up. Above all, though, it makes ambient occlusion look like it’s on steroids. You have no idea how terribly—and I mean really, really—annoyed I was that in KCD2 we couldn’t render shadows from hats, hoods, and helmets on characters’ heads, or even shadows from small details on character models (buckles, laces, pouches). DLSS5 does this, and it does it absolutely brilliantly! (see examples 1, 3, 7, 8, and 11). On top of that, it improves the rendering of shadows in hair (5), so they finally have the right density and darkness. It doesn’t do much in the environment, but interestingly, it lightens shadows in some places and renders textures within them, while darkening them where it makes sense (10, 12, 13, 14). So there’s a slight improvement here as well. It also renders shadows in grass and vegetation better. Which is definitely a good thing. For me, this is primarily an excellent photo realistic upgrade to the character lighting model. The “minor” issue is that it cuts the frame rate in half :) But its not the infamous AI slop we saw couple months ago. I see huge potential here for the future, and it’s absolutely great that even older games lighting could be improved this way.