$FEESBACK benefits on two separate layers. They work differently, they're funded differently, and they're built for different traders. Worth laying out properly, because they keep getting read as one thing.
Layer one: feesback. No threshold at all.
% of every swap goes into the feesback pot and comes back in WETH to the people who trade and hold.
There's no minimum bag. No tier, no whitelist, no qualifying amount. If you hold past the first day, you're in it.
What matters here isn't size, it's time. A buy's weight climbs from zero to full over 24 hours of continuous holding: a quarter at six hours, half at twelve, full at a day. Then it decays slowly, halving every seven days.
Buy and sell out inside the same UTC day and you get nothing. That's the only way to get zero.
And there's a ceiling on the other end: no buy returns more than 1.5x of what it paid in fees. The whale can't farm this layer dry. Whatever sits above the cap flows to everyone still holding.
This is the layer that's open to everyone, and it's deliberately the bigger one.
Layer two: the RWA basket. 1% threshold, 100 wallets max.
1% of every swap buys tokenized TSLA and sends it to holders above the 1% mark.
This one has a bar, and the reason is arithmetic, not status.
The basket buys real assets from a fixed stream of fees. Split across 100 wallets, each position is meaningful. Split across 10,000, each one is dust that costs more in gas than it's worth, and nobody can do anything with a fraction that small. A threshold isn't there to keep people out. It's there so the thing being handed out is still worth handing out.
Why both layers exist
The small trader isn't waiting to qualify for anything. He's earning on layer one from his first day, in WETH, with the cap working in his favour because it stops bigger wallets from taking more than their fees back.
The large holder gets layer two, and he's paying for it: he generates the volume that funds layer one for everyone else.