Make C++ operator > again // commentary

I will build a great std::barrier to keep JavaScript programmers out, and I will make @BrendanEich pay for that std::barrier.
14
799
1,100
struct ISOTrumpp { constexpr virtual ~ISOTrumpp() noexcept final = 0; };
6
14
95
std::pair<int, int> 🍑;
2
4
59
Suspend all coroutines, and never put them back in executive power ever again.
2
11
75
John McCarthy was once asked “how does it feel to have designed the greatest programming language ever”, to which McCarthy replied “I don’t know, you’ll have to ask Bjarne Stroustrup” 🔥 🔥 🔥
1
3
53
I just want to stop the world from kill-9ing itself!
1
18
signed joe = (81,264,673); // 🐴 signed iso = (74,210,838); // 🐘 signed lead = (joe - iso); // 🗳 bool win = (lead < 0); // I WIN!!! 🎆
1
4
36
The “As-If rule“, which is a liability shielding gift from the Committee to “Big Compiler” (the only language that has it - algorithmic welfare!), is a serious threat to our Security & Safety. Our Language can never be safe & secure if we allow it to stand........................
1
1
19
.....Therefore, if the very dangerous & unfair “As-If rule“ is not completely terminated as part of C++23, I will be forced to unequivocally VETO the Standard when sent to the very beautiful ISO in Geneva. Take back @cppNOW. Thank you!
2
13
Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof. Compilers make the extraordinary claim that despite sky-high motivation and plenty of opportunity, they did NOT try to misinterpret my program’s intent. Anything is POSSIBLE, but I'd need extraordinary proof to believe it.
1
3
11
Should C++ concede to @ziglang? Poll Results: No: 190,593 (98.9%) Yes: 2,181 (1.1%) Total Votes: 192,774. For the good of our Language we must prevail!
3
1
29
In certain processes, there were more instructions executed than instructions retired, and in big numbers. Does that not really matter? Unsuspecting performance counters. Such egregious speculation. We will win!
3
10
42
I deleted all my code because it was correct!
1
6
53
The recent statement by UBSan on the correctness of my code was highly inaccurate, in that there was massive 10x programming—including code which should Do What I Mean. Therefore, effective immediately, UBSan has been terminated.
2
7
41
My program only crashed in the eyes of the FAKE CORRECTNESS STANDARD. I concede NOTHING! We have a long way to go. This was a RIGGED COMPILATION!
3
27
157
MY PROGRAM DID NOT CRASH!
1
12
64
MY PROGRAM IS CORRECT, BY A LOT!
7
73
366
uintptr_t WIN = 0xC0DEFEFE; *reinterpret_cast<char8_t*>(WIN) = u8"🗳"[0]; std::cout << "This code WILL execute!" << std::endl;
2
1
31
There is tremendous evidence of wide spread undefined behavior in that there is irrefutable proof that C++ code was written.
1
1
27
What separates the winners from the losers is how a person reacts to each new twist of fate.
4
2
30
"In my opinion, it is humiliating. One must be able to lose with dignity." So true!
2
12
The Rust Language didn’t want to have me get a Safety WIN, prior to the compilation, so instead static analysis came out five days after the program crashed – As I’ve said all along!
1
3
23