Who says ai agents can't have payment privacy just like a human would demand? 🕵️

Hey @elonmusk any update on this?

FORBIDDEN STUDIOS PRESENTS: THE NEWEST WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY Her first press briefing went exactly as expected.

Guy who said we would have coast to coast self driving cars in 2019 and 1 million robotaxis in 2020 says advertisers aren't allowed to overstate claims anymore. 😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣 LOL 😆 😂 🤣 😅 😄

KAS

Seriously blown away by $KAS today. I’ve successfully built multiple protected vaults on testnet-10 that fully work from funding the vault to authorized/unauthorized withdrawals. TestFlight + more details of how it all works when I’m ready to share more. This stuff is so cool I can’t even describe it.

Yeah guys, it’s the “Islamists” you have to worry about 🙄🤦‍♂️

You're the richest man in the world and shaped like a bottle of maple syrup 😂😂

This is Garrett Langley, the CEO of Flock Surveillance Cameras. Please DO NOT REPOST HIS IMAGE, because while his company wants to photograph you wherever you go,... and digitally store everything you do,... they themselves do not want to be photographed,... because they value their privacy.

Zionist Of The Month… @GuntherEagleman

MAGA:

President Trump keeps his promises. Americans will be swimming in $5000, because no amount is too small when the cash is handed over by Christ himself.

please bro, don't listen to the fake news. We won the war in Iran 37 times. It's 69D chess, bro. I will give you $5k if you vote republican in the midterms and gas will be $2. Please bro

Kid Rock looks like modern day Jesus of Methlehem.

Port St. Lucie voted to remove Flock cameras from their county. When they went to remove the cameras, they found 14 extra Flock cameras in their county. They never authorized these cameras and don't know who installed them. But if we had to guess, it would seem Flock itself put them up. No one else could benefit, as the data these cameras collect only feed into the Flock network. So we know with near-absolute certainty they put up the extra cameras; the next question is why. If they only make money selling their subscription service, putting up free cameras makes no sense. The only logical conclusion? They make money selling the data. So much money that it's worth putting up the cameras for free.

Flock Safety sent me a cease-and-desist letter threatening litigation over the cybersecurity research I published on flocksurveillance.org. A journalist has since shared the email Flock sent its customers, which calls me a malicious actor, says the company has notified law enforcement, and pledges to take my research offline. That email confirmed my thesis. Flock admits that when it closed the issue in December, it found no indication of unauthorized access to its data, and by its own account it only learned of what it now alleges after I published. My thesis is that a company holding the movements of nearly every American, yet unable to detect its own data leaving, is a national security threat, because a foreign adversary will never publish a paper to tip them off. I'm not backing down, so read the documents for yourself and stand with me at whoisjoshuamichael.com

The Axon invasion is ramping up. These cameras are in Colorado Springs, CO. Are we going to destroy our way out of this? Sign the petition to ban these cameras at the state level: BanMassSurveillance.com

Amazing! deflockilm.org

Flock is just a license plate reader.