Have no current plans to monitor the Bitget exploit by DPRK. I stopped wasting my time on helping people in the industry who are not supporters of my work (donors, clients, longtime followers, etc).

Dear CoinEx Community, Today, I am announcing that CoinEx will cease operations and begin an orderly wind-down. First, what matters most: your assets are safe. CoinEx’s reserve ratio exceeds 100%, and every user asset is fully backed and available for withdrawal. Withdrawals are open starting today and will remain open until December 22, 2026. Certain tokens may take slightly longer to process while funds are moved between cold and hot wallets, but every withdrawal request within the withdrawal period will be honored and processed. CoinEx officially went live on December 22, 2017. Exactly nine years later, on December 22, 2026, the platform will be formally closed. Nine years is a long time in crypto. Together, we lived through multiple bull and bear cycles, witnessed the rise and fall of countless projects, and watched many of our peers leave the market in one form or another. After much reflection, I have come to accept a hard truth. CoinEx did not become one of the industry’s leading exchanges, and the security and compliance risks of running a crypto exchange have become increasingly difficult to contain. Revenues can decline, responsibility does not. Carrying unlimited risk for limited revenue is no longer a rational choice. That said, CoinEx has survived nine years in one of the most volatile and unforgiving industries, weathered every storm, and is leaving intact, and with dignity. We may not have won the race, but we are finishing with honor. On CET: CoinEx will buy back CET at its initial listing price of 0.005 USDT per token, with no cap on quantity. To every CET holder who has supported us over the years, thank you. CET represents your belief in CoinEx and, for many of you, your belief in me personally. I am sorry that we were not able to create the long-term value we once hoped CET would deliver. The least we can do now is bring that chapter to a responsible conclusion. I did seriously consider selling CoinEx. Ultimately, I decided against it. Users entrusted their assets to CoinEx because they trusted the platform and, in many cases, trusted me personally. I did not feel that handing the platform and that trust to a new owner was the right way to end this journey. A clean ending is the right ending. Nine years, millions of users. I did not turn CoinEx into the “great” exchange I once hoped it would become. But I can give it a decent ending: making sure users can withdraw their assets in full, giving my employees a dignified farewell, and providing CET holders with a clear and responsible conclusion. This is the best ending I can give CoinEx. To everyone who traded with us, built with us, and stood by us through the hardest days of this market, thank you. It has been a privilege to walk this road with you. To the CoinEx team, thank you for building this platform with me, for carrying it across every cycle, and now for seeing it through to the very last day. For detailed arrangements, please refer to the official announcement: coinex.com/en/announcements/… Thank you all for nine years of trust. Haipo Yang Sept 15, 2026

《再致胡锡进老师——什么才是体面》 胡锡进老师： 上次给您写信，是向您请教彩礼的规矩。这次想请教一件更大的事。 您的三篇文章，我都读了许多遍。您批评我不体面。这些天我反复想的，不是怎么回答您，而是慢慢发现：我真正不清楚的，是您说的体面和我说的体面，是不是同一个东西。 什么才是真正的体面？ 您是长辈，一九六零年生人，比我刚好大三十岁。您那一代人的体面，我在父辈身上见过。无法可依的年代，两个人做成一件事，靠的是一句话、一杯酒、一个愿意作保的人。作保的人拿什么保？拿他一辈子的名声、位置、关系。 我小时候见过一位这样的长者：别人几年要不回的账，他一顿饭要了回来；两家人几乎反目，他各打五十大板，两边都服。他一生没有签过几份合同，但他说过的话，没有一句落过空。那个年代的体面是有重量的，这是那个时代资源分配的规则。我的父辈受过这种体面的恩惠。这份功劳，我认，而且记着。 我是一九九零年生人。我们这代人是在另一种东西里长大的：计算机、算法、合同、法律、白纸黑字。它冷，冷得常常让您那一代觉得无情。但当我抚摸着这些冰冷不近人情的东西，那时我隐约觉得，最大的体面，也许是不用讲体面。 我们这代人做的事，是试着把饭桌上的事情，搬进法律，搬进代码，搬进人工智能。 两代人各有一套体面，也各有一本账。我想把我想不清楚的三个问题写下来。这三个问题不是问您的，也不是问我自己的，是想把它们放到桌面上，问给下一个三十年的中国年青人。 第一问：一个人受了损害，被夺走了钱、尊严、时间，是消化它体面，还是主张它体面？ 您那一代的答案是消化，咽回去。打掉牙往肚里咽，在那个年代不是懦弱，几乎是成年礼，委屈没有去处，消化就是仅有的尊严。而且你们真诚地相信，不计较是一种修养，即便内耗到难以复加。我见过这种修养最好的样子：一位老人吃了大亏，一生不提，把气力都用在往前过日子上，儿孙满堂的时候，谁也看不出他缺过什么，只是谁也没见过他深夜辗转的样子。他不是不知道自己有理，而是不相信有理有用。 我这一代的答案是主张，说出来。不是我们脾气大，是委屈第一次有了去处：什么算数、什么不算数，越来越多地写在了纸上。受了损害去立案，在我们看来不是撕破脸，是把脸交给规则去评，交给公众去评。每个人也第一次有了自己的讲台，只是讲台上说的话，同样要经得起规则的称量。 消化有消化的尊严，主张有主张的代价。哪一种更体面，我不确定。 第二问：人和人做事，彼此之间相信道德交情，还是相信合同与算法？ 道德与交情的好处，我不敢小看。它快，它暖，它在规则够不着的地方依然有效，今天中国的许多事，仍然是交情在办，而且办得不坏。一个人愿意以道德为另一个人作保，这件事本身，任何时代都值得敬重。 合同与算法的好处是另一种：它让互不相识的人可以合作，让没有引荐的年青人有一张入场券，让信用离开具体的人也能存在。交情护得住熟人，护不住陌生人；合同认得了条款，认不了难处。 而我们这代人真实的处境，是站在两套办法的中间： 合同签了，还是要吃饭；道理占了，还是要找人。这中间的路要走多久、怎么走，我不确定。 但是我有预感： 年青人往后要去的地方，越来越多是没有熟人的地方，新的城市，新的行业，新的国家。在没有熟人的地方，面子是带不走的，能带走的只有合同和算法。它们不认人，所以认所有人。 我做的东西，绝大多数使用它的人不认识我，也不需要相信我的人品，他们只需要相信规则本身。这件事教育了我。 第三问：一个人未来财富的创造，应当来自他占据的位置，还是来自他创造的东西？ 这一问，我把自己也放进去问。我的行业很年轻，规则来得比行业晚，我们是在创业创新长大的一代年青人，从来就没有过什么正确答案。我没有资格站在这个问题外面。正因为如此，我格外希望它被认真问下去，问所有人，也问我。一个时代敬重什么样的富人，年青人就会成为什么样的人。这个问题的答案，比任何一个富人的答案都重要。 我见过两种富起来的路。一种富贵长在人身上：认识谁，跟过谁，坐在哪张桌子的哪个位置。人在，钱在；人走，茶凉。一种富贵长在东西上：一项技术，一个产品，一行代码，它做出来那天起，就不再需要主人守着，天南地北的陌生人都可以用它、检验它、靠它谋生。 两种路，中国都走过，都还在走。哪一种走得更远，我们这代人正在用自己的一生下注。 三个问题，写完了。 这三问，轮不到您和我裁决。而是今天的九零后，零零后，一零后，今年出生的孩子，三十年后正当壮年。他们会用他们认定的体面去待人、经商、成家、立业，这个国家将来是什么样子，说到底，是他们的模样。 您比我年长三十岁，见过我没见过的年代；我比您年轻三十岁，会看到您看不到的年代。可是在三十年后的年青人面前，您和我坐在同一排：都只有发言权，没有裁决权。 您让我在外多为故国做些有益的事情，故国在我心中重如千钧。太空里什么都是失重的，唯独这一样，我称过，分量没变。 您是长辈。这一排里，最该谦卑的是我。所以这封信不是论战，是交卷。 我的答案只有一句：最大的体面是不用讲体面，这就是我理解的体面。 我知道这句话会被比我年青的人修改。我期待被修改。 三十年后，如果有年青人拿着更好的答案来找我们，希望您和我都还在，都还愿意听。 孙宇晨

Elon Musk just confirmed that SpaceXAI’s next 2-trillion-parameter model is already better than Grok 4.5 in every way and is expected to finish initial training next week Elon said it may surpass Kimi while keeping speed and token efficiency close to Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 already delivers frontier intelligence with exceptional speed, remarkably low token usage and one of the lowest costs per task among leading models Its combination of intelligence, speed and efficiency is already in a league of its own Now SpaceXAI is scaling intelligence even further without abandoning the efficiency that made Grok 4.5 so impressive The next Grok model is not simply getting bigger It is getting smarter while staying fast and incredibly efficient