Community Leader | X Ads Expert | #ICP Investor | #ICPSquad 8-Year Gang VP ๐Ÿ”ฅ |

Abuja, Nigeria
Moses โˆž retweeted
Keep your $XRP on OISY. On an exchange, the exchange holds your keys. On OISY, nobody holds your whole key, not even OISY. Itโ€™s split across ICP replica nodes, and nothing moves unless you say so.
3
22
94
1,262
๐Ÿ‘Œ
We're about to switch the ICP Dashboard to a new version: every number is read straight from the chain, and the dashboard itself is served from a canister. internet-computer:native Like it? Don't? Found a bug/issue? Tell me below ๐Ÿ‘‡ g3psz-xyaaa-aaaam-ajeza-cai.โ€ฆ
3
41
750
The $ICP Cloud Engine is the solution, and it comes with a zero down time ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿš€
๐Ÿšจ NEW: Google Cloud has reported an โ€œissueโ€ affecting dozens of services across the UK They include Revolut, Lloyds, HSBC, Halifax, Rightmove, Royal Mail, Bank of Scotland, DPD and Sky
1
5
53
705
How $ICP,s onchain cloud can make AI safer ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€
An important advantage that network cloud can provide to onchain services is better "AI Safety". Here's how. When AI makes cryptography unsafe, networks can be rapidly upgraded, protecting all hosted software. With traditional tech stacks, algos are linked into the various layers and components, making upgrading difficult and laborious for those operating services. Networks, like the Internet Computer/ICP, can abstract the core security math that keeps hosted services safe. They can also upgrade peripheral (non-core) cryptography. For example, on a dime, the Internet Computer could could upgrade to a new version of HTTPS in response to AI suddenly making the current version unsafe, without those running services having to do anything. By contrast, on traditional tech stacks, (or "on" traditional blockchains, where the apps are actually served from traditional tech, such as from AWS, with only tokens a DeFi logic onchain), those running services would need to manually upgrade all their web servers and application servers. Where the software powering a service makes HTTPS outcalls to other services, it will be directly linked to libraries enabling the calls โ€”ย so it will all need to be upgraded too! By contrast, the Internet Computer hosts serverless code, where these kinds of complexities are abstracted away from services. If a service makes an HTTP outcall to another service, the call uses whatever version of HTTPS the network chooses (since the network makes the actual call on behalf of the software). If the network is upgraded, then so is every service โ€”ย automatically. This further reflects the way that the Internet Computer as cloud dramatically reduces security admin and systems admin demands compared with building on traditional tech, and additional unique advantages. It also highlights another crucial axis on which networks must be measured, whether they seek quantum safety (when relevant) or AI safety (since today, AI can now find flaws in algorithms and software at any time) โ€”ย agility. That is, how fast can a blockchain network be upgraded in response to a new threat? The Internet Computer is unique in that it is orchestrated by a decentralized governance system called the Network Nervous System (something like a DAO with system privileges, but much more sophisticated). That enables the network to be agile, and to rapidly respond to emerging threats, by upgrading the code running on the node machines hosting it. The Internet Computer is a self-updating, adaptive network. The ability of chains to rapidly react to new threats that have been suddenly uncovered/created by AI, whether they are flaws in cryptography algorithms, or flaws in software libraries, will be a defining feature as things get more hairy. This is a conundrum for traditional chains chasing quantum safety, of course. By definition, they are claiming that upgrading networks is a long and arduous process, and therefore that they have achieved something important and valuable by upgrading to quantum-safe algorithms ahead of time. But the algorithms they are upgrading to โ€” so they can claim "quantum safety" โ€” are new and do not benefit from the decades of examination that e.g. ECDSA has. What then, if AI finds suddenly problems with them, like it did with HAWK? They have tacitly declared that they cannot quickly switch back, because transitioning is something that takes time, which is why their upgrades are such an achievement... I will press the point no further, but as an industry, we need to get much more nuanced and sophisticated in how we understand security in an age where AI can suddenly upset security assumptions and make software insecure. The Internet Computer has got this crucial agility axis covered, and it's agility, not the premature adoption of new and unproven quantum safe crypto algorithms, that really defines safety. The key point is, if a network has to adopt these unproven algorithms years before a cryptographically-relevant quantum computer exists, then it's doing something very wrong. The Internet Computer has solved agility. It provides an end-to-end alternative to traditional tech, where people can build services, and gain safety and independence from the rapidly shifting sands of security that the AI era will bring. It is another reason that the mainstream world needs Internet Computer cloud. It's a security and resilience haven.
3
48
811
#Sol now live in Openchat ๐Ÿ‘Œ Only possible in $ICP
Got SOL? Bring it into the conversation! ๐Ÿ’ธ You can now deposit Solana directly into your OpenChat wallet, so you can tip a great message, pay a friend back in a DM, or send SOL to anyone in a group, all without leaving the chat.
38
620
Moses โˆž retweeted
OpenChat is now integrated with both @ICPSwap and @tacodaoicp for swaps! It'll get quotes from both, then proceed with the best one.
5
28
95
1,688
Quantum narrative chasers wouldn't like this ๐Ÿค—, but the truth is bitter ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿ’ฏ
Crypto Quantum Fool Index (CQFI) In replies, score chains 1-10 with examples. why: 1. Quantum-safe algorithms new/AI dangers 2. Cryptographically-relevant quantum computers 2029+ (conservatively) 3. Premature adoption = bad judgement & Y2K narrative chasing over user safety
1
19
523
1. $ICP 2. #ICP 3. ICP
Top 3 projects everyone should hold?
2
3
46
714
Some are willing to bet on $ICP having a 10% downside and miss out on the unlimited upside of $ICP. ๐Ÿค” Everyone knows that $ICP under $10 is a gift, yet you're watching as everything in the ICP ecosystem is coming together, positioning itself as a real business, and you still have that little voice in your head saying, โ€œNah, it won't fly.โ€ Alright, keep watching. ๐Ÿค—๐Ÿš€
1
3
63
955
True privacy is only possible with $ICP ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€
Nice ๐Ÿ”ฅ This illustrates how you can build true cryptographic privacy on top of the Internet Computer. There are lots of privacy narrative protocols these days where operators have backdoors, or which rely on weaker hardware-based privacy (TEEs). Here, performance + real privacy
1
20
126
1,645
Moses โˆž retweeted
Ever wondered how OpenChat works? Now you can see for yourself on our new interactive map. Every canister type, with its endpoints, state and the calls between them, all generated from the source code at each release. Click a canister to zoom in. oc.app/architecture
4
54
180
2,979
This guys are building it better than #Near, #Zec and others inside the $ICP ecosystem ๐Ÿค—. Only possible in $ICP๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€
The wait is over shielded $ICP is now live. Every transaction is private, even from the node providers running the network. Your send history, balances, and activity stay protected. We built it to go beyond SEVโ€™s limits, using pure cryptography so proofs are generated in your browser and verified on-chain without exposing anything. $BTC is coming next. $ICP #Privacy #ZK #InternetComputer
15
119
1,781
Moses โˆž retweeted
You're not skipping ICP. When you pay by card, CyclePay does your exact steps for you: 1. You pay by card 2. CyclePay takes ICP from its own balance 3. It sends that ICP to the NNS cycles minting canister, which burns it and mints the cycles (the same thing icp cycles mint does for you) 4. The cycles land in your account about 20 seconds later, ready to top up your canisters There is no way to create cycles without burning ICP. Paying by card just means someone else holds the ICP and does the minting for you. Every card purchase shows on the ICP ledger as ICP sent to the cycles minting canister. At current prices, a $25 purchase burns about 8 ICP. So ICP still: - is the only thing cycles are made from, and gets burned on every purchase, card or not - is what you stake in the NNS to govern the network What changes is who can use ICP. Lots of developers and companies won't buy crypto on an exchange just to pay for hosting. Now they can pay by card, and their usage still burns ICP. If you already hold ICP, nothing changes for you. Keep minting the way you do.
2
23
107
1,923
๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿš€
With cloud engines, apps run without cycles, and now, deploying to the shared Internet Computer subnets will be a breeze too. Agents can show users QR codes, so they can pay with their credit cards, avoiding token friction. ICP is becoming mainstream agentic infrastructure.
2
2
38
1,210
This is $ZEC, from $6,000 down to $15 before shocking everyone. ๐Ÿ‘€ And that's how $ICP is going to shock a lot of you very soon. ๐Ÿš€ Keep watching the price chart and writing $ICP off. One day, many of you will look back and wish you had paid attention. ๐Ÿ”ฅ Keep watching! ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿš€ #ICP
WELCOME TO THE CRYPTO GRAVEYARD. $FIL, $ICP, $DOT, $PI ๐Ÿ’€ Which other altcoins deserve a place here? Drop your nominations below. ๐Ÿ‘‡
5
19
217
5,288
Are you getting more here or you are loaded already? $ICP
8
5
34
1,651
You are only bullish on the price action not the tech action? ๐Ÿค”
I might have to get Bullish on $ICP again soon! $ICP is one of those projects that could either Run HARD or Fail miserably. However, Looking at this $ICP chart, it is showing signs of a beautiful bottom. Are you Bullish on $ICP? #icp #internetcomputerprotocol #aicrypto
2
4
55
1,705
The clown blocked me ๐Ÿ˜.
Replying to @sagewilyam
So finally you are now promoting ICP and saying good things about it's tech ๐Ÿ˜ so all those times you where attacking and fudding it then it was attention you were looking for ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค” these guys ehhh ๐Ÿ˜Œ
1
1
20
1,301
When I said everyone who has ever FUDed $ICP will eventually turn around and praise it, I meant it. ๐Ÿ‘€ It's already happening. Watch out for them one after another. Once the price starts moving, some of them will even pretend to be $ICP OGs in the future. ๐Ÿ˜‚ This space is crazy! ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿš€
7
10
119
2,097
At this point, I don't even have the time to tell anyone or advise anyone to get some $ICP and hold. Bro, you don't deserve it. Don't buy it. ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ‘Œ $ICP is going to leave a lot of retailers behind, and that's just normal. Retailers only value something when they can no longer afford it. I repeat, bro, don't buy #ICP. It's not for everyone. Go and buy the meme you understand. ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿš€
15
27
250
4,173