Paparazzi caught intruding on Harry and Meghan’s privacy by taking photographs of their children on the way to school. Sorry, my mistake, it was posted by Meghan on her commercial Instagram account

🚨NEWS! I'm sooo exited to announce that I'm joining @News24 to launch Unleashed with Samara Gill. It will be UNLEASHED in every sense of the word! Filming in London to a global audience, I will be bringing a digital FIRST approach to politics, culture and of course the royals from the biggest stories dominating the headlines to ALL the debates raging on your X feed, the viral moments and conversations shaping the internet (what you actually want to watch!) Coming soon. Stay tuned!🌏

🚨 NEW: The UK's second richest billionaire David Reuben has quit the UK for Monaco He is worth around £28bn

OK FOLKS .. Delighted to have been able today to get to the heart of the Earl Spencer book/Diana/Prince Harry story with the most elegant of show hosts Mr @mrmarkdolan 😁 👍 🖥 🎤.. Catch it here .. piped.video/dafabmbhDvw

Fury as NSPCC say male teachers can supervise girls in changing rooms trib.al/ilToTDN

WOMEN'S RIGHTS AREN'T YOURS TO GIVE AWAY.

Had a ball filming with @mrmarkdolan discussing--- what else? Everyone's un- favourite Private Citizens. Many thanks for having me Mark. You are a giant and a gent!

I see that Stella Creasy is accusing me of leading a pitchfork mob against her, because I opined that she is less likeable and more hypocritical than the wild parakeet she mistook for an escaped pet. For those who don’t know, Creasy is an elected politician and self-proclaimed ‘old-fashioned feminist’ who is ‘still fighting the patriarchy’. She’s more than once publicly defined herself against me (and my reaction was not to accuse her of leading a mob, even though I was probably averaging a dozen death threats a day at the point when the article below appeared.) I thought it might be instructive for those of us who don’t share Creasy’s brand of ‘feminism’ to examine her campaigning record, so we can learn to do better. Creasy wants women admitted to the male-only, exclusive, London-based private members Garrick Club, a change that would benefit rather privileged women like Creasy. Creasy is a mother who wants better accommodations for working mothers, a change that would benefit Creasy. Creasy takes selfies at a men-only Muslim march because that reminds everyone how non-racist she is, which benefits Creasy. Creasy asserts that ‘trans women are women’, which keeps her in good odour with her party’s most aggressive activists, and benefits Creasy. However, keeping cross-dressing heterosexual men out of nurses’ changing rooms doesn’t benefit Creasy, because Creasy has never had to mop up other people’s piss, blood and vomit at work. Challenging the notion that a male basketball player becomes a girl if he says he is doesn’t benefit Creasy, who has no sporting ambitions. Speaking up against the patriarchy as practised by non-white men doesn’t benefit Creasy, who wants those selfie-opportunities. Criticising an ideological movement that persecutes, harasses and openly threatens women who don’t believe some women have penises wouldn't benefit Creasy, because she's already fully-signed up to self-id, where any man who says he's a woman must be taken at his word. As the late Gloria Steinem said: ‘“Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It's about making life more fair for women everywhere.’ Creasy the patriarchy-challenger is provably more than happy to cosy up to men and misogynist movements when it suits her public profile and career advancement, no matter the harms those men might be causing less privileged women. By Steinem’s definition, what Stella espouses is not feminism, but Creasyism, and I suggest the emblem for this brave new rights movement should be an indignant parakeet with severely ruffled feathers. telegraph.co.uk/women/life/s…

🚨 BREAKING: Keir Starmer has announced he is resigning as the MP for Holborn and St Pancras

David, I’m the other black one.