The shop is the instinctive answer, and in a normal loan it would be right. In a well-structured receivables deal, it's the U.S. Navy.
The shop has already delivered its parts and is waiting to be paid. Instead of lending against the shop's promise to repay, the fund buys the invoice outright, checks it with the Navy, and arranges for the Navy to pay the fund directly when it's due. The money never passes through the shop. So the yield is priced off a small supplier, and the cash comes from the Navy, which is a much stronger payer. This is what call Credit Risk Arbitrage - investors can generate high yield like returns while taking investment grade or sovereign level counterparty risk.
This is how the credit managers behind USD* structure their trade receivables, and is why we've decided to add these specific managers to portfolios.
Two positions can pay the same yield, but carry very different credit risk. The difference is in the underlying assets, the legal claim, how repayment reaches the lender and who takes the first losses. We go through all of that for USD* holders before deciding where to allocate.
Sunday poll (It's back!!)
A fund lends $1m to a small sheet metal shop that supplies the U.S. Navy.
Who pays the fund back?