Robert Ghrist = mathematician; engineer; educator; assoc. dean of undergraduate education Penn Engineering; illustrator; animator; acta non verba

philadelphia, pa
increasingly concerned that ai is revealing the mathematical world as negatively curved. instead of everyone wandering about in idea-space and clustering around the same famous conjectures (local positive curvature), ai is pushing out the boundaries rapidly and revealing that the space of mathematical ideas is ~hyperbolic (negative curvature). though this means there's lots left to discover, it also means that small separations between people/agents will lead to wandering alone. we may be emerging into an idea-space where there's so much to see and do but everyone is alone in a private heaven, unable to share their subtle joys with others...
13
19
200
5,670
prof-g retweeted
Conley Index🤝 Flow Categories Landfall Geometry arxiv.org/abs/2610.30993 Joint with Frances Kirwan!
Landfall Geometry Frances Kirwan, Vidit Nanda arxiv.org/abs/2610.30993 [𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚑.𝙰𝚃 𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚑.𝙳𝚂]
2
7
26
1,471
N7 4 EV #bioware
1
6
1,217
every prof should be figuring out *now* what book(s) to write. don't write it [yet]. just create the plan assuming no limits on time or scope. get the story & outline set for the perfect book on [X] no matter how niche. then wait & prompt it into being in [Y] months...
5
57
4,926
prof-g retweeted
The most and least difficult subjects at Penn, according to student reviews:
42
33
637
203,150
it is said that G K Chesterton dictated all his works, and that he kept several secretaries on hand to write things up. he would cycle through them, switching continually from one book/article to the next without pause. --- "a man ahead of his time," i type into X, as i switch between dictating book chapters to claude, chat, and grok...
4
3
38
2,132
as a reminder, it's all just a matter of perspective...
1
1
26
1,324
Tesla engineers after the demo...
7
923
what i said at the penn ai-risk panel: you find out what a person is really like after they win the lottery. welp, we all just won the intelligence lottery, and ai is now a mirror held up to show who we truly are. what are you gonna to do with all them smarts?
11
17
129
4,703
i am speaking at an AI safety panel today... what should i say is the biggest risk? (tempted to say "doing too little because we're all too busy assessing risks")
20
2
42
3,127
am thinking about what the future of a "math book" should be... heavy on graphics; with interactive elements (e.g. GPT Sites); dynamic references that auto-update N-times-per-year to reflect changes; self-repairing to fix errors... not paper & not a pdf... maybe a github repo?
23
11
101
5,199
i've been stalled out on writing up my Applied Dynamical Systems book for more than a year, mostly due to not being able to get the style *just right*... gotta hand it to fable -- really really good at setting up a bespoke lualatex rig...
3
3
61
3,273
amid the angst over what human/ai mathematicians can/should do now, i gave a talk at Penn that framed things in terms of four 20th century eigenmathematicians and their stereotypical styles: 1. erdos -- this is what ai has excelled at; shotgunning results, examples & counterexamples, prolific 2. wiles -- go deep & solve the big-name conjecture; this is where we are now w/openai & anthropic's recent works 3. grothendieck -- build the incomprehensible unpredictable ur-theory that cracks something open and exfiltrates to other areas; this is where all ai-enthusiast mathematicians i know are directing their energies; not quite there yet... === but the 4th is not a direction i've seen people discuss & it's where i personally want to dig in... === 4. milnor -- find the connections between deep things and weave a story of such clarity & elegance that it changes the field and how people learn it and use it === this aligns with the "humans will still drive tastes" argument for relevance, which is not yet proven to survive pressure from top models. i suspect that there is, both now and for a spell, room for a creative director to use ai-tools to write the book-of-X (or direct the playlist-of-X) for various values of mathematical X.
18
48
309
17,590
ironic that the one citation of OpenAI to my research was for an ancient paper that got rejected over & over & over as being too weird/irrelevant/eccentric
13
11
209
10,099
oh, wait, most of my papers (except for surveys or simplistic things tossed off in a week or two) got rejected over & over & over as being too weird/irrelevant/eccentric
1
42
1,287
prof-g retweeted
Replying to @AndrewCurran_
asked claude to make a breakdown of where the signatories are affiliated. almost a third are french surprisingly, then another third american
3
2
59
15,743
"Mathematicians did not ask for this work to be done"
7
12
163
7,307
prof-g retweeted
The AIs are now the smartest mathematicians in the world. Given how mathematicians have seized control of governments, corporations and the culture, I fear what comes next.
24
20
396
40,892
Sitting in a math faculty meeting where the agenda (set two weeks ago) is "let's talk about math and AI". Lol. LMAO even.
10
7
371
55,600
since my phd work in the early 90s, figures have been an integral part of most papers i write... as i read through the stack of openai math papers what stands out most is the lack of figures. those that exist are generic.
13
32
428
19,121