i've always found the narrative that 3+ kids were "status symbols" strange. similarly, the discourse earlier this month re: that GQ article got notably hostile between those with 2 vs. 1.
people seem p uncharitable to parents of varying family sizes, maybe parents most of all
Is this a new status symbol? I don't think so. It looks more like children fall for all families except the 1% over the past 30 years.
Maybe the things that made children more difficult for the 99% just bounced right off the 1%? /2