Diversified asset classes in the most valuable real estate today, that is orbit, are important. It's not wise, and nobody wants to try to create a world where it's just cheaper for anybody else to buy a service and resell it because 1 operator holds the major chunk of the destination and access to it; or do we?
Once India’s consumption of a Starlink equivalent or Starlink per se begins, you know the numbers will be higher than anywhere in the world. Principally because, with no such sovereign/indigenous equivalent existing to begin with, the cons/strategic disadvantages in a volatile geopolitical world today far outweigh the pros.
From a government’s perspective, it is a looming/apparent threat for any country to have a dependency that big without any counterpart that is indigenous given the use cases are wide and the tap can be shut off at any moment. We’d like to see India and the world have more choices in orbit.
India is building and will have its own equivalent. Period. Maybe then the competition begins, when the birds get to orbit. Perhaps then, is the time to allow competition.
Everyone loves an underdog; until it aims to compete. That's been the story with India for the most part. So the mass sentiment is valid. If that makes a few people uncomfortable, god bless.
The ridiculous arguments by Ambani’s army of Internet shills make no sense
On the one hand, they say Starlink couldn’t possibly compete with the amazing low prices offered by Ambani’s de facto monopoly in India and then, in the same breath, they essentially claim that Starlink would be too strong of a competitor! This is absurd hypocrisy and hyperbole.
The reality is that competition would greatly benefit the average citizen in India by giving them more choices, as it always does. Ambani’s profits will be lower, but he is not going out of business. And, obviously, if Starlink is too expensive in India, no one will buy it, so SpaceX will need to make pricing affordable.