if you want to understand how AI will progress, study how bots changed chess and poker. Compare and contrast.
the best humans can’t beat top bots at chess. Never.
Poker is different. Bots beat pros over large samples, but a human can still sit down and win a session. That's because poker is a game of incomplete information and chess isn't.
a bot can play close to game theory optimal poker, but the hidden cards and variance give humans a fighting chance, especially in the short run.
Life is poker, not chess. It’s a game of incomplete information and luck. No amount of computing power eliminates that reality. This means the best bot won't be the one that wins every hand. It'll be the one with an edge that compounds over thousands of decisions.
In the short run, anyone can win. In the long run, the edge gets paid.
In chess, ‘human-plus-bot’ teams once beat bots alone, until the engines got too strong and the humans just got in the way. In a world full of hidden information, that partnership lasts longer.
SO, in the future, the winner won't be human or bot. It'll be a human who knows what the bot can't see, when to use judgment and intervene, and when to shut up and let it play.