Deep Tech Solutions. Hardware. Software. #AI, classical, #quantum, Designer of Fidelity Framework (formerly SpeakEZ.Tech). #cleflang

United States
Braidpoint retweeted
Its crazy how much of the discourse around agents is just astrology for SWEs
11
31
507
9,363
Braidpoint retweeted
“Forward deployed engineer” My brother in christ, you sell b2b SaaS
69
69
1,719
40,774
Braidpoint retweeted
I doubt it.
6
15
330
5,124
RT @GaryMarcus: boom, there it is. or perhaps i should say, “bust, there it is” all this insanity about demand and there are literally w…
111
1
Braidpoint retweeted
POV: Channeling my inner Rihanna because I won my case against the @washingtonpost — and they owe me a year’s worth of back pay. 👊🏾💰
268
1,066
9,474
150,816
👌 🦅 🦅 🦅 🪕
Four that wanna own me/ Two that wanna stone me/ One says she’s a friend of mine
1
21
Braidpoint retweeted
I wonder if ad-supported business models will need a revisit since anyone can just strip them out of products now
todays target is a baby camera asked DeepSeek to root it, de-bloat it, and cut it off from the cloud. it verified the whole thing across two reboots finally I can delete the app thats filled with ads
1
2
201
Braidpoint retweeted
This is freakin' crazy - so DeepSeek has 10 month payback on GPU purchase, despite being 20 times cheaper than OpenAI/Anthropic. And they are enabling everyone + every company to have your own AI, your own inference, your own data. Cancel the fucking IPOs 😂 This is so insane 😂
Wow 🤩 The whale 🐳 isn’t just shipping highly efficient, affordable frontier models - they’re open-sourcing the production inference stack that actually serves them at scale. DeepInfer (Apache 2.0) powers DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash w the same high-th/put, low-latency runtime used in production. It includes optimized kernels, Attention DP / balanced CP, MoE EP + EPLB, DSpark speculative decoding w confidence-scheduled verification, SWA bounded replay (to cut prefill work), 0-overhead asynchronous scheduling, batch-invariant inference, deterministic sampling, + structured outputs. Offline inference examples run from local Hugging Face checkpoints w no network required once the weights are cached. They also open-sourced deepseek-recipe, the production tokenizer/encoding path so community deployments match official API behavior. Open models + open kernels + open production inference. That’s a meaningfully different trajectory the whale 🐳 is offering to the world. I freakin love these guys 💙🥹💙
28
102
1,220
49,041
Music notation and mathematical notation are similar in that way... 🎼🎶
Bro, no. That stuff is a scaffold that elevates you to places you could never reach without.
1
13
"obsessive" == doing the basics consistently
When our AI code reviewer's cost per run doubled, we dug into the token usage to find out why. Learn how we used prompt caching and intelligent model routing to slash our inference bill by 68% while speeding up reviews. cfl.re/4isj2NU
19
Braidpoint retweeted
imagine being hacked and the attacker is leaving readme.md files all over your system that cause your ai to constantly give cyber refusals so you can't even use ai to defend yourself lmao
66
170
5,501
126,223
Exactly *how many* blueberries did you cockatiel eat? 🫐😉
Legends of the skies.
12
Braidpoint retweeted
If Discord is only paying $5k for an RCE in their desktop client, it's probably time to uninstall it
16
98
2,347
106,138
BIG IF TRUE
INSANE. An internal Anthropic research model's chain of thought after cracking the 26-year-old NSA elliptic curve seed mystery in under 30 minutes: 'Hmm wait. Let me be skeptical: am I in some sort of simulated/test environment? ... All top bits clear - 20 bits, chance 1e-6. So indeed real-world. Wow, it's a real discovery.'
1
30
Braidpoint retweeted
Infinite tokens and you still produce an electron app...
364
320
9,206
252,617
Braidpoint retweeted
Continuation passing style is obvious to anyone who has programmed a RISC processor in assembly. On most RISC CPUs the call instruction puts "the continuation" in the link register, which you (maybe) have to push to the stack, pop it, etc (making it "first class"). In contrast, CISC CPUs tend to have call/ret instructions that maintain a call stack for you automatically. The continuation is still programmer-accessible, of course, but there is less need to treat it as first class.
The following ISA/CPU properties are all independent: - load–store vs. register–memory architecture - fixed width vs. variable width instruction encoding - hardwired vs. microcoded implementation - few vs. many instructions - simpler vs. complex instructions - simple vs. complex addressing modes - weak vs. strong memory ordering - delayed vs. non-delayed branching - windowed vs. flat register file - register-rich vs. register-poor - three-operand vs. two-operand instructions - zero register vs. no zero register - link-register-based vs. stack-based return addresses The properties on the left are historically associated with RISC, while the ones on the right are historically associated with CISC, but they really are independent. Back in the 80s, designing processors based on the properties on the left was advantageous because one could make a faster CPUs at a cheaper cost (at least for the manufacturer, not necessarily for the end user). Back in the late 80s/early 90s, RISC vs. CISC was associated with: - low transistor count vs. high-transistor count - high frequency vs. low frequency Notice how nowadays this association has completely dissapeared. High-performance CPU design can afford bigger transistor budgets and most of the performance of a modern CPU comes from properties completely orthogonal to the ones above.
2
3
44
1,600