onchain receipts on post-quantum & privacy l1s before ct catches up | $qtc $noid | nfa · @qlyphsxyz ambassador
- Tweets 2,251
- Following 872
- Followers 833
- Likes 5,826
Pinned Tweet
$QTC went live on near.com today with only 1.27% of its supply actually circulating
> tl;dr 98.7% is unmined or vesting, and the big insider cliff is 338 days out
267k qtc circulating x $100 = ~$26.7m. not the $2.1b fdv
math, receipts, how to buy and the one wallet to watch
coingecko still shows mc as $0 (coingecko.com/en/coins/quant…), so heres the live chain read from qtcscan.com/supply
- 5.72m of 21m qtc issued
- 5.46m of that locked in the vesting pallet
- ~54k mined since sep 9 genesis
> 46 schedules hold 5.42m qtc and release nothing before sep 9 2027. every one is listed here: qtcscan.com/vesting
the split is in the whitepaper (quantus.com/whitepaper): 23% team + investors, 4% company, 1y cliff then 36mo linear
until today the only market was a cex the team never endorsed, ~$1.4k of +2% depth. their oct 1 warning about it: x.com/QuantusNetwork/status/…
> today @near_intents opened qtc to 180+ assets on 30+ chains: x.com/QuantusNetwork/status/…
the near pool opened at ~$20 (24h low $19.98). its ~$101 now, 1,781 buys vs 164 sells, $13m liquidity: geckoterminal.com/near/pools…
how to buy, official route only:
- go to near.com, sign up with a wallet or passkey, no email no kyc
- swap into qtc from usdc, btc, eth, sol, zec or 180+ other assets
- swaps route through the @rhea_finance pool via near intents solvers
- withdraw natively to your own quantus wallet (quantus.com/wallet) if you want self custody
- real ca on near is qtc.omft.near, any other "qtc" ca is a copy
props to @QuantusNetwork: vesting fully onchain and no dev tax, block reward is just unmined supply / 50m (docs.quantus.com/deep-dives/…)
the risk:
- miners print ~2k qtc/day (~$200k)
- the team pegs mining cost at $45-80/coin (quantus.com/blog/weekly-upda…)
- sep 2027 adds ~4.9k/day for 3 years
> so when you see "one wallet holds 73% of the float", now you know: its the treasury's 210k, the 1% set aside for initial liquidity. it moved oct 5, and nearblocks now shows 185k qtc bridged to near: nearblocks.io/token/qtc.omft…
treasury account, check the outflows yourself: qtcscan.com/account/?address…
now you know more about $QTC than 99% of ct. nfa dyor
QTC is now live on near.com, powered by @near_intents.
Swap into QTC from 180+ assets across 30+ chains, including BTC, ETH, SOL, and ZEC.
Every swap is confidential by default.
Quantum secure encrypted money, now one swap away.
13
21
125
86,837
one address has won ~every $CSD block since july. last 24h: 720 out of 720
tl;dr the gpu coin that 5090 profit tables rank 2nd behind $prl went from 65 block winners in may to one
thats ~36k csd/day (~$3.5k at $0.097) passing through one wallet before it reaches a single miner
how i counted:
- pulled the coinbase of 300 blocks per date from the public node api (pic 1)
- apr to jun: top address 21-30%, up to 65 different winners
- jul 2: 300/300 to 0x6fd602af...b290866a
- mid jul it switched to 0x40379fb1...62b7bd
- since then 90-100% every sample, last 720 blocks: 720/720
its a pool, not one rig. every ~2h it pays ~3.5k csd out to 24 addresses, the biggest takes about a third
"fair launch, no premine" checks out. no dev allocation in the code, params.rs is 88 lines
but fair launch isnt decentralized. whoever runs that stratum picks every tx and can reorg the chain at will
mc is ~$610k on one exchange and mining calcs are the main shill rn
credit to @Cairn_substrate tho, wallet, rpc and an onchain swap shipped on top while the core repo went quiet (6 commits in oct)
before you point a gpu at $prl, $qtc, $noid or $CSD, run the same check: coinbase of the last 500 blocks
one address at 90%+ means one operator holds the chain
honest minus: i cant prove who runs the pool yet. 24 payout addresses means the hash is spread, its the operator thats single
who runs 0x40379fb1? drop it below
1
1
113
receipts:
1. pic 1 data: explorer.computesubstrate.or… - txs[0].outputs[0] = 0x6fd602af. try 60000, 80000, 125001: 0x40379fb1. heights 1 to 30000: many different winners
2. pool payout, 72 inputs, 24 outputs: explorer.computesubstrate.or…
3. payouts every ~2h: explorer.computesubstrate.or…
4. 50 csd/block, 120s, no premine: github.com/compute-substrate…
5. price, one market: api.coinpaprika.com/v1/ticke…
28
qlyphs' new wallet has a solana bridge sitting inside it. 257 test txs already went through it on devnet
> tl;dr the code signs "redeem wQTC" on solana and releases QTC to your quantus address. it shipped switched off, but its in your browser rn
i opened keys.qlyphs.com/ui.js (v0.1.19, the wallet that dropped oct 20) and read past the libraries
whats in there:
- a module called solana-vault, pointed at solana devnet
- two review screens: "quantum vault payment" and "redeem wQTC"
- redeem = burn wQTC once on solana, the same amount of QTC gets released on quantus
- each signature works once, for one recipient, inside a window of solana slots. the site submits it, your wallet sends nothing
- a build flag, QLYPHS_SOLANA_VAULT, keeps it off for now
then the txs. the program from the code was deployed oct 17 08:50 utc, 257 txs by 17:12
most calls cost ~9k compute units. then one costs ~637k, 70x more, ~45% of a solana tx budget (pic 1)
that heavy tx is only 278 bytes. a pq signature is kilobytes, so it goes into a buffer first, then gets checked in one shot
my read: the dev is verifying post-quantum signatures inside a solana program
second find, mint sessions:
the wallet can run a mint for you. up to 25 lots, 10 retries, 30-300 sec, max 0.44 qtc fee per lot
the end states include "race-lost" and "sold-out"
a buy button has no "race-lost". this is a bot that races for lots, built into your wallet. for now dev network only
why now: yesterday i showed quantus' own near bridge is still "in development". qlyphs is building a second door
honest minus: devnet only, the flag is off, and the wallet says no security audit. dont move size through any of it yet
receipts in the reply, check it yourself
what the f*ck are you planning @iamyacine
nitter.siddz.com/qlyphsxyz/status/21125…
The new Qlyphs Wallet is out.
Your wallet now lives in your browser. No website needed.
Using the web wallet? Import your recovery phrase and move in. Same address, same QTC.
Trade $YUVI, $QUANTUMCAT, $QITCOIN, $QPEPE and more, right from Explore.
Collections are coming.
2
1
9
502
receipts:
1. keys.qlyphs.com/ui.js - search "solana-vault", "Redeem wQTC", "QLYPHS_SOLANA_VAULT", "race-lost". version "0.1.19"
2. explorer.solana.com/address/… - the program, deployed oct 17, 257 txs
3. heavy call (pic 1): explorer.solana.com/tx/4eW3X… - "CUs Consumed" 636,988, size 278 bytes
4. cheap call: explorer.solana.com/tx/3AoGr… - 9,062
5. keys.qlyphs.com - wallet footer: "no security audit"
1
95
2 days later o189 is down to 55.9% of $noid blocks. not because it slowed down
> tl;dr the net went 399 to 921 gh/s in a week and a second wallet started sweeping
- o124ken: 12.9% of blocks, 2,810 of its 2,892 came this week, ~1.4k left of ~41.6k mined
- the two together move ~28.3k noid ($14.8k) a day, ~12% of all volume
- pay per gh/s halved: $47.9 to $23.7 a day, price only +14%
minus: o124ken could be a pool paying out, i see coins leave, not where they land
solo farm or a pool?
one address mined 62% of $noid blocks in the last 24h. it found its first block on oct 16
tl;dr 1,793 of 2,880 blocks, ~26k noid a day, all of it shipped to safetrade every ~3h
the book only just got deep enough to take it.
math below:
now i think $noid the safest trade i know rn is noid, books are growing, you can size
so i checked both sides
the miner (o189lhaa…sv6p59):
- pic 1: 16 of the last 25 blocks on the explorer, same address
- share of blocks per 24h: 5.8% → 51.6% → 62.3%
- every ~3h it sends 98.4% to one deposit address, 1.6% to another. both sweep into safetrade's hot wallet within ~90 min
- ~26k noid in 24h = ~$14k a day at $0.54
the book (safetrade api, 3 snapshots this morning):
- bids within 10% of mid: ~$1k on oct 17, ~$47k now
- asks within 10%: ~$4.6k then, ~$32k now
- $47k of bids = ~3 days of that flow. oct 17's book couldnt take 2 hours of it
so books: right. size: half right
a $10k market buy fills ~3.5% over mid, a $25k exit ~7% under. the spread alone is 4.5 to 5.6%
on oct 17 i pushed back on "one pool makes 85% of blocks", the top miner had 30%. today the top 3 have 85.0%
props to @ignotus_nemo for capping reorgs at 17 blocks (~9 min). limits what a majority miner can rewrite, doesnt remove it
risk: 62% of hash in one wallet, 42% of supply on one cex. thats not "safest". its sizeable on the way in
if the 3h sweeps stop hitting safetrade, the biggest seller changed its mind
anyone know whose rig o189 is?
3
21
1,001
receipts:
1. parano1d-scan.com/mining - 7d hashrate chart (low 331 / high 986 gh/s), top miners on 24h / 7d / all time tabs
2. parano1d-scan.com/api/histor… - raw 3h buckets, hashrate + blocks, the daily averages come from here
3. parano1d-scan.com/address/o1… - 716 noid balance vs 6,986 blocks mined
4. parano1d-scan.com/address/o1… - ~1.4k balance vs 2,892 blocks, outbound txs at the bottom
5. parano1d-scan.com/market - $125.5k 24h volume, -62% vs prior 24h, safetrade = 100% of it
6. ethresear.ch/t/paranoid-eip-… - ignotus' eip-8288 post
2
155
the #3 "whale" on $qtc's rich list is kryptex: 37.6k qtc ($3.4m), zero outbound transfers ever. its not a bag. its a receipt
tl;dr every mined qtc lands in an address nobody can sign from. 92.7k already left privately, more than was ever mined
math + how to check it below
how it works:
- block rewards mint into a wormhole address, no key exists for it
- miners exit with a zk proof to a fresh address
- the new address gets credited, the old balance never drops
so the rich list counts those coins twice. qtcscan measures the gap:
5,843,653 qtc in all balances - 5,750,914 issued = 92,739 exited privately
top 100 miner addresses: 82.3k qtc, 0 of 100 ever sent a normal tx. 81.2k mined since sep 9
what it changes:
- kryptex, quanpool, luckypool = 74.8k qtc ($6.8m) of overhang that isnt there
- the gap = 31% of the 296k circulating float
- 100% of mined supply is born private
check: qtcscan.com/accounts, line under the table. "pool" + "no outbound" = skip it
watch the gap. if it outgrows mining, holders are going private, not just miners
props to @quantusnetwork for private issuance by default, not an opt-in nobody uses
the catch:
- coins can exit more than once, so 92.7k is volume, not unique coins
- privacy cuts both ways. nobody can prove who holds qtc, insiders included. every whale-wallet take is unverifiable, bull or bear
which number would you track to spot holders going private?
$QTC went live on near.com today with only 1.27% of its supply actually circulating
> tl;dr 98.7% is unmined or vesting, and the big insider cliff is 338 days out
267k qtc circulating x $100 = ~$26.7m. not the $2.1b fdv
math, receipts, how to buy and the one wallet to watch
coingecko still shows mc as $0 (coingecko.com/en/coins/quant…), so heres the live chain read from qtcscan.com/supply
- 5.72m of 21m qtc issued
- 5.46m of that locked in the vesting pallet
- ~54k mined since sep 9 genesis
> 46 schedules hold 5.42m qtc and release nothing before sep 9 2027. every one is listed here: qtcscan.com/vesting
the split is in the whitepaper (quantus.com/whitepaper): 23% team + investors, 4% company, 1y cliff then 36mo linear
until today the only market was a cex the team never endorsed, ~$1.4k of +2% depth. their oct 1 warning about it: x.com/QuantusNetwork/status/…
> today @near_intents opened qtc to 180+ assets on 30+ chains: x.com/QuantusNetwork/status/…
the near pool opened at ~$20 (24h low $19.98). its ~$101 now, 1,781 buys vs 164 sells, $13m liquidity: geckoterminal.com/near/pools…
how to buy, official route only:
- go to near.com, sign up with a wallet or passkey, no email no kyc
- swap into qtc from usdc, btc, eth, sol, zec or 180+ other assets
- swaps route through the @rhea_finance pool via near intents solvers
- withdraw natively to your own quantus wallet (quantus.com/wallet) if you want self custody
- real ca on near is qtc.omft.near, any other "qtc" ca is a copy
props to @QuantusNetwork: vesting fully onchain and no dev tax, block reward is just unmined supply / 50m (docs.quantus.com/deep-dives/…)
the risk:
- miners print ~2k qtc/day (~$200k)
- the team pegs mining cost at $45-80/coin (quantus.com/blog/weekly-upda…)
- sep 2027 adds ~4.9k/day for 3 years
> so when you see "one wallet holds 73% of the float", now you know: its the treasury's 210k, the 1% set aside for initial liquidity. it moved oct 5, and nearblocks now shows 185k qtc bridged to near: nearblocks.io/token/qtc.omft…
treasury account, check the outflows yourself: qtcscan.com/account/?address…
now you know more about $QTC than 99% of ct. nfa dyor
3
3
14
974
receipts (block #265,494):
1. qtcscan.com/accounts - line under the table: balances exceed issued supply by ~92.7k qtc. ranks 3/4/6 = kryptex, quanpool, luckypool, all "no outbound"
2. qtcscan.com/accounts-data.js… - summed_balance 5,843,653 vs total_issuance 5,750,914. miner_accounts: 100 of 100 has_ever_sent false
3. qtcscan.com/about/#balance-u… - a private wormhole spend doesnt debit the sender, so balances are upper bounds
4. qtcscan.com/supply - mined 81,187 qtc, circulating 295,839
5. github.com/quantus-network/q… - rewards mint into the balances pallet at the wormhole address
6. docs.rs/crate/quantus-cli - wormhole address is unspendable, derived from a secret, exit by zk proof
7. geckoterminal.com/near/pools… - qtc/usdc on rhea, $90.67 for the $ figures
1
138
$qtc is quantum-safe money. the bridge it trades through isnt finished yet
> tl;dr quantus' own docs list the threshold bridge to near as "in development", its audit "in progress", testnet "planned". 15 days after near.com opened trading
coinbase's paper below has one ask that matters for custody: at least one pq scheme that works with mpc / threshold signing. thats the setup behind ~99.9% of what coinbase holds, and lattice sigs like ml-dsa dont split into key shares easily
quantus is on the same road:
- every qtc tx signs with ml-dsa (neodyme audit, dec 2025)
- qtc has no smart contracts, so the only way out to usdc, rhea, near.com is a bridge
- that bridge is a fork of near's mpc node, with hashcloak auditing threshold ml-dsa. still open
near itself puts pq incoming cross-chain in 2027. pq threshold signing for outgoing is still research
so when you see "quantum-safe money, one swap away", now you know: the coin is pq, the swap is the part being built
credit where its due, @QuantusNetwork publishes the status table instead of hiding it. most teams wouldnt
risk: if hashcloak finds something, the fix lands on the only door qtc has
what ships first, the audit or the next listing?
Ensuring Bitcoin’s future in a post-quantum world requires preparation and collaboration across the industry.
We're doing our best to contribute to that work along with many others. New blog post live. (link in follow on post).
2
4
25
1,293
receipts:
1. docs.quantus.com/deep-dives/… - "current status" at the bottom: mpc node in development, hashcloak audit in progress, near intents in development, testnet planned
2. coinbase.com/blog/working-to… - the ask: pq options that work with mpc, hsms and threshold signing
3. postquantum.com/security-pqc… - the ~99.9% figure (pq-corekms, coinbase's mpc key system)
4. quantus.com/whitepaper/ - audits table: neodyme on ml-dsa dec 2025, hashcloak on threshold ml-dsa "2026"
5. github.com/Quantus-Network/n… - the forked mpc node
6. forklog.com/en/quantus-post-… - near pq roadmap: incoming cross-chain 2027, outgoing threshold still research
1
176
ct shared the $noid paper all day. nobody quoted table 2: a big block takes 21s to prove on a 24-thread pc, 35s on a laptop. blocks come every 30s
> tl;dr small blocks are easy, big blocks are 10x the room and need real hardware. v2.1 decides which ones the chain runs on
the numbers, page 15 (zenodo.org/records/23485635):
- small block: 25 app positions, 6.9s to prove on the pc, 10.7s on the laptop
- big block: 255 positions, 21.1s and 34.9s
- 10x the room for 3x the time. per position the big block is ~3.3x cheaper
- but a laptop needs 116% of the block time for one big block
proof size is the other wall:
- big block proof: 1,081,108 bytes
- docs cap a block terminal at 1,100,000. 98.3% full
right now its ~2 tx a block (6,044 in 24h), so small blocks are plenty. native tokens, a launchpad and a dex are the stuff that fills them
props to @ignotus_nemo for printing the slow numbers next to the fast ones, plus reproduce commands and his own open problems list
the minus is in that list:
- 127 bits classical is proven
- the quantum bound clears nist category 1 by ~3.4 bits (2^173.4 vs 2^170), and the compiler assumptions under it are still listed as "further work"
- one author, preprint, no outside review yet. reference profile isnt the live one (23/24 dims live, 22/24 measured)
so when you see "post-quantum, mathematically proven", now you know: proven classically, conditional on quantum, and the author says so himself
which prover do you think the 62% miner runs?
Mathematics behind Parano1d's proof-native architecture.
Preprint published: Transparent Proof-Carrying State over Binary Tower Fields
zenodo.org/records/23485635
Recursive State verification, authenticated GKR reductions, heterogeneous recursion, security bounds and real proving benchmarks. Theorems, proofs, reproducible experiments and open research questions.
4
17
1,379
receipts:
1. zenodo.org/records/23485635 - the preprint. p.15 table 2 (prove times, proof bytes), 7.1 (25 vs 255 positions), p.21 (2^173.4 vs nist 2^170), section 10 (open hypotheses)
2. docs.parano1d.org/protocol/p… - 30s target, terminal cap 1,100,000 bytes, large blocks opt-in
3. noidexplorer.org - 6,044 tx in 24h, ~2 a block
4. x.com/ignotus_nemo/status/21… - the announce
5. git.parano1d.org/ignotusnemo… - rev e8185fd, cargo run --release --locked -- --exact reproduces the security math
Mathematics behind Parano1d's proof-native architecture.
Preprint published: Transparent Proof-Carrying State over Binary Tower Fields
zenodo.org/records/23485635
Recursive State verification, authenticated GKR reductions, heterogeneous recursion, security bounds and real proving benchmarks. Theorems, proofs, reproducible experiments and open research questions.
2
256
one address mined 62% of $noid blocks in the last 24h. it found its first block on oct 16
tl;dr 1,793 of 2,880 blocks, ~26k noid a day, all of it shipped to safetrade every ~3h
the book only just got deep enough to take it.
math below:
now i think $noid the safest trade i know rn is noid, books are growing, you can size
so i checked both sides
the miner (o189lhaa…sv6p59):
- pic 1: 16 of the last 25 blocks on the explorer, same address
- share of blocks per 24h: 5.8% → 51.6% → 62.3%
- every ~3h it sends 98.4% to one deposit address, 1.6% to another. both sweep into safetrade's hot wallet within ~90 min
- ~26k noid in 24h = ~$14k a day at $0.54
the book (safetrade api, 3 snapshots this morning):
- bids within 10% of mid: ~$1k on oct 17, ~$47k now
- asks within 10%: ~$4.6k then, ~$32k now
- $47k of bids = ~3 days of that flow. oct 17's book couldnt take 2 hours of it
so books: right. size: half right
a $10k market buy fills ~3.5% over mid, a $25k exit ~7% under. the spread alone is 4.5 to 5.6%
on oct 17 i pushed back on "one pool makes 85% of blocks", the top miner had 30%. today the top 3 have 85.0%
props to @ignotus_nemo for capping reorgs at 17 blocks (~9 min). limits what a majority miner can rewrite, doesnt remove it
risk: 62% of hash in one wallet, 42% of supply on one cex. thats not "safest". its sizeable on the way in
if the 3h sweeps stop hitting safetrade, the biggest seller changed its mind
anyone know whose rig o189 is?
7
1
22
3,603
receipts:
1. noidexplorer.org/address/o18… - 3,453 blocks since height 226,979 (oct 16 23:24 utc), sweeps every ~3h
2. noidexplorer.org/address/o1m… - the 98.4% address: 46.6k noid from o189 plus 19.5k from o1rjvvf9, the old top miner (37.5% on oct 17, ~0 now). 100% forwarded to safetrade
3. noidexplorer.org/richlist - safetrade hot wallet o1hk70wq…qnx9sy, 4,606,432 noid = 42.2% of 10.92m
4. safetrade.com/api/v2/trade/p… - raw book, sum bids and asks within 10% of mid yourself
5. x.com/Checker1crypto/status/… - oct 17 baseline: ~$4.6k asks / ~$1k bids within 10%, top miner 30.4%
6. docs.parano1d.org/protocol/p… - hard finality 18 blocks, max reorg 17
$noid went $0.19 → $0.598 since my oct 9 post and its still a $3.9m mc pow l1. the supply map shows who can sell next
> tl;dr dev funds: 1m locked till january. safetrade: 4.58m, 42% of all noid. the $0.598 top printed the same day +345k landed on that wallet
pic 1, the price (safetrade.com/exchange/NOID-…):
- $0.19 at my post, $0.598 top on oct 15, $0.357 now
- 10.8m net supply x $0.357 = ~$3.9m mc. even at the top it was ~$6.4m
- for scale, $qtc's liquid float on the same quantum narrative is ~$33m (x.com/Checker1crypto/status/…)
pic 2, who holds the 10.8m (noidexplorer.org/richlist):
- safetrade: 4,575,848 = 42.4%
- two dev fund vaults: 1,000,000 = 9.3%
- one wallet that pulled ~566k off safetrade on oct 4-5: 500,000 = 4.6%
- everyone else, ~2,180 addresses: ~4.72m = 43.7%
pic 3, the dev side (github.com/ignotusnemo/paran…). on oct 9 i flagged the 10% dev cut with no reports (x.com/Checker1crypto/status/…). a week later:
- 1,059,840 noid received, 25,278 spent on bug bounties, no sales listed
- 1,000,000 locked in 2 vaults until block 490,000 (~jan 16), checkable in your own wallet via f7 (x.com/ignotus_nemo/status/21…)
> the exchange wallet is the tell. oct 14-15 it took in +653k net, 7x what the chain mined, and the top came right in that window. the last 24h flipped to -83k net out (noidexplorer.org/address/o1h…)
props to @ignotus_nemo for answering a supply critique with a vault contract instead of a thread, and for shipping v2.0.4 with the legacy matrices gone, exactly as he told me in replies (x.com/ignotus_nemo/status/21…)
the risk:
- new fund payouts land unlocked, 4,608 noid a day, ~418k more by block 490,000
- 42% on one cex is one custody risk and most of the sell side
- thin book: ~$4.6k of asks and ~$1k of bids within 10% of mid
> so when you see "one pool makes ~85% of $noid blocks", now you know: over the last 3,000 blocks the top miner address made 30.4%, the top two 53% (noidexplorer.org)
3x in 8 days, open source, contracts live on mainnet, and still a $3.9m mc. so whose is the 500k wallet?
1
501
8 of the 9 most held tokens born on $qtc are stuck at the same spot: lot 201, where qlyphs' old curve jumps the price 10x
tl;dr v2 sold 20% of supply for 1% of the raise, then hit a wall. v3 deletes the wall
1,600 lots sold at 0.01 qtc. only 177 at 0.10
math below
how v2 works (their docs):
- 1,000 lots per token, 5 price steps
- lots 1-200 cost 0.01 qtc each, so the first 20% of supply = 2 qtc (~$204)
- lot 201 costs 0.10. 10x in one click
- graduating takes the full 210 qtc (~$21.4k)
everyone grabbed the cheap tier, then nobody wanted to pay 10x for lot 201
its live on app.qlyphs.com/tokens:
quantumcat 25.5%, qcat 25.3%, qitcoin 23.9%, qday 21.1%, qpepe 20.7%, schrodinger 20.5%, quconut 20.5%, yacine 20.2%
together they raised ~34 qtc of the 1,680 they need. 2%
v3, announced last night:
- no lots, one exponential curve. price climbs on every buy, not in 5 jumps
- buy lands in 1 block, sells paid within 6
- every buy and sell farms points
- grads go to @rhea_finance, where the qtc/usdc pool already holds ~$12.6m
no cliff = no single lot where everyone stops
v2 went live oct 13, v3 got announced 5 days later. @iamyacine saw the stall in his own data and rebuilt the curve instead of blaming the market
risk: v3 has no date yet and the protocol isnt audited (their own faq says so). points also pull in wash farmers, so when it opens watch unique wallets, not volume
disclosure: qlyphs ambassador, nfa
now you know more about qlyphs v3 than 99% of ct
nitter.siddz.com/qlyphsxyz/status/21119…
Post-quantum memecoins are coming.
Bonding curve v3:
• No more lots. One exponential curve
• Buy in 1 block, sells paid within 6
• Every buy and sell farms points
• Graduates to @rhea_finance
Quarks are now infinite.
app.qlyphs.com
2
2
11
1,192
ju is right, qlyphs ships faster than it tweets
the last 10 days on $qtc:
oct 9 quarks go live on mainnet
oct 13 tokens + bonding curve go live
oct 14 $yuvi sells all 1,000 lots in ~11h and graduates to @rhea_finance
oct 15 protocol goes open source
oct 18 v3 curve announced
the gas war fix checks out: a losing mint fails before its payment moves, and multi mint works (one wallet took 4 yacine lots at once)
5 releases, ~1k views a post. marketing gap, not a product gap
v3 is the second chance. no date yet, not audited
nitter.siddz.com/juisXdaddy/status/2111…
team @qlyphsxyz keep shipping
V2 runs very smooth
it has resolved the gas war issue and even supports multi minting.
The team is highly focused on technology, though they are a bit weaker to marketing.
The trench should give them another chance.
147
receipts:
1. nitter.siddz.com/qlyphsxyz/status/21119… v3 announcement: no lots, one exponential curve, points, rhea
2. docs.qlyphs.com/progressive-… v2 tier table: 0.01 / 0.10 / 0.20 / 0.30 / 0.44 qtc per lot, 210 qtc total, curve live from block 218,350
3. app.qlyphs.com/tokens sort by most holders: % minted + "price steps up in N lots" on every token. yacine's card shows +900%, thats the 0.01 to 0.10 step, not a pump
4. dexscreener.com/near/refv2-1… qtc/usdc on rhea, liquidity
5. qlyphs.com faq q7: not audited yet
Post-quantum memecoins are coming.
Bonding curve v3:
• No more lots. One exponential curve
• Buy in 1 block, sells paid within 6
• Every buy and sell farms points
• Graduates to @rhea_finance
Quarks are now infinite.
app.qlyphs.com
1
177
the $noid dev just showed a launchpad where the creator cant pull the reserve. launches graduate at 20,000 noid raised
2.3 launches a day would need as much noid as the chain mints. and "backed" is a ~4% floor, not a peg
20,000 x $0.415 = ~$8.3k a launch vs 46,080 new noid a day. math below
pic 1 is the v2.1 preview he posted today:
- each token locks min 0.001 noid of backing, apart from the curve and pool
- holders burn to redeem their share. creator cant withdraw it, no minting after launch
- a 1m supply token = 1,000 noid (~$415) locked from day one
- every pair on screen is token/noid
he floated the reserve idea oct 18. 26h later he showed it running in a preview wallet
what "backed by $noid" means in numbers: orb's preview price is 0.0248 noid, its floor 0.001. thats 4%
it stops a creator draining the reserve. it doesnt stop the chart
why noid holders care: to buy any launch you need noid first. the only usd door is still safetrade, holding 4.42m noid = 40.6% of supply
credit to @ignotus_nemo for batch settlement on the dex: your limit stays binding, so nobody fills you worse than it
the risk:
- it runs on a preview chain at height 18,420. mainnet is past 234k, no date yet
- no v2.1 commits in the public repo, latest is oct 16
- launchpad media is reviewed and hosted by parano1d. a team gate on a no-trust chain
receipts in the reply
would you ape a launch with a 4% floor the creator cant touch?
Inside Parano1d v2.1...
An entire financial ecosystem, built into the existing proof-native L1. Native tokens backed by $NOID. Launchpad, bonding curves, DEX, liquidity pools, atomic swaps and NFTs. All inside the wallet.
No signatures. No EVM. No L2.
Every financial operation becomes part of a proven State transition, recursively verified all the way back to genesis.
One post-quantum proof stack. From ownership to execution to consensus.
We're not changing the architecture to build DeFi.
We're making it capable of DeFi in a post-quantum world.
parano1d.org
ALT Trade: Native DEX. Batch swaps with enforceable price limits
ALT Launchpad: Bonding curves. Native liquidity. Same asset ID
ALT Create Token: Fixed supply. NOID-backed redemption rights
ALT NFT Marketplace: Native NFTs. Atomic payment and ownership transfer
4
7
50
3,502
receipts:
1. x.com/ignotus_nemo/status/21… - v2.1 preview, 4 screens: launchpad (20,000 noid to graduate, 0.001 backing per token), create (reserve rules, no extra minting), trade (batch settlement), nft
2. x.com/ignotus_nemo/status/21… - oct 18 proposal: protocol-locked reserve, burn to redeem, no creator withdrawal
3. noidexplorer.org - net supply 10,885,736, 16 noid per block, $0.4148, mainnet height
4. noidexplorer.org/richlist - safetrade wallet 4,420,529 noid
5. safetrade.com/exchange/NOID-… - the only noid/usdt market
6. github.com/ignotusnemo/paran… - latest commits oct 15-16, nothing on tokens or launchpad yet
7. docs.parano1d.org/protocol/e… - 16 noid every 30s = 46,080 a day
I think meme launchpads have destroyed a lot of trust in crypto. Centralized stablecoins aren't much better. A handful of people can freeze funds at any address or issue more tokens whenever they want. How is that decentralization?
I don’t want to carry this into a post-quantum future where a few people get rich at the expense of thousands. So I’m considering a different approach for Parano1d.
Every native token would launch with a minimum initial NOID reserve locked by the protocol. Holders could burn their tokens to redeem their proportional share. Creators would have no privileged withdrawal rights, and additional issuance would have to preserve the NOID backing per token.
Tokens could still trade freely at market prices, including through liquidity pools. The right to redeem a proportional share of the NOID reserve would travel with the token.
Enforceable financial rights, built into the protocol and verified by block proofs.
What do you think?
4
318