I refuse to let the answer to better cybersecurity be simply "SPEND MORE MONEY." That can't and should not be the goal post for our industry. We cannot let our bankroll be the determining factor of being "secure" or not.
Walmart and your regional law firm are both fighting against ransomware, phishing, and stolen credentials. Their budgets are very different.
Of course security costs money. Building and maintaining tools and platforms costs money. When I talk about this, I’m not asking vendors to give everything away for free, and I’m not suggesting one product can make an organization secure. If that’s what you get from this argument you’re missing my point.
My reason for discussing this is to debate what security features should vendors include at a base level vs what should they charge a premium for?
If a feature is essential to using a vendor’s product safely, why should a smaller customer have to buy a higher-tier bundle to get it?
And if that protection addresses a weakness the vendor introduced, the case for including it should be even stronger.