#MidtermsAreComing Americans you know you have a duty to your forefathers. Be the land of the brave, home of the brave and get rid of the tyrannical control over your once great nation. Half way to getting him out. Thank you for your attention in this matter. 🇺🇸

A societal pariah isn’t automatically a political prisoner, Lee. Danny Tommo isn’t simply accused of “popping a rubber dinghy”. He’s accused of slashing a vessel with a knife while an emergency responder was aboard. He also faces a separate charge of failing to disclose his phone PIN to police. He denies both. And what about Dover? He’s already pleaded guilty to entering a restricted zone at the Western Jet Foil migrant processing facility. He also faces separate allegations involving threatening behaviour, obstruction, unauthorised entry into Dover Docks and racially aggravated harassment. These remain contested allegations, not convictions. His barrister proposed bail conditions in the Channel case. A Crown Court judge refused bail, explicitly setting political considerations aside. You can question that decision. But reducing this entire history to someone “popping a rubber dinghy” while declaring our legal system corrupt is hardly an honest presentation of the facts. Innocent until proven guilty applies to everyone. So does the law. Sources: Dover charges and guilty plea: portsmouth.co.uk/news/crime/… Channel incident and charges: news.sky.com/story/anti-migr… Bail refusal and judge’s comments: lbc.co.uk/article/anti-migra…

Glenn Beck is taking genuine government preparedness programmes and presenting them as evidence that global war is imminent. Let’s examine the facts. Britain’s Be Ready campaign launched publicly on 22 October 2026. It recommends 72 hours of food, water and essential supplies for emergencies such as storms, power cuts and disrupted services. The EU’s equivalent strategy dates back to March 2025. It explicitly covers natural disasters, pandemics, cyberattacks and armed conflict. The Pentagon’s FORTRESS programme is also real. It seeks to protect military operations against infrastructure failures, sabotage and supply-chain disruption. These are sensible precautions in an increasingly unstable world. They are not evidence of an imminent third world war. And invoking a warning made before the 2008 financial crash doesn’t magically validate a prediction made in 2026. There are legitimate geopolitical risks worth discussing seriously. They deserve analysis, not theatrical certainty. Preparedness is not a prediction. Contingency planning is not confirmation. Sources: gov.uk/government/news/house… eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-cont… defensescoop.com/2026/10/07/…

Liam, you’ve managed to turn someone being charged into someone being imprisoned, then implied convicted child sex offenders are being released to make room for her. That’s not what the evidence shows. Kellie-Jay Keen has not been convicted or sentenced. The allegation against her must be tested against the law, including protections for freedom of expression. The CPS explicitly states that merely offensive or shocking political speech is generally protected. And while prison overcrowding and early release are genuine concerns, the 2026 reforms specifically exclude rape and serious child sexual offences. There are legitimate concerns about remaining gaps. You can criticise those gaps without inventing a connection to Keen’s prosecution. Free speech deserves protection. So does factual accuracy. CPS guidance: cps.gov.uk/publication/respo… Parliamentary analysis: commonslibrary.parliament.uk…

Joseph Boam wants you to believe he’s the victim of a political witch-hunt. Unfortunately for him, the evidence tells a rather different story. On 30 October, Leicestershire County Council’s conduct panels upheld two complaints against the Reform UK councillor. One panel included TWO Reform councillors, two Conservatives and a Liberal Democrat. The decision was UNANIMOUS. The findings included: • Publishing a selective video clip that misrepresented a senior council officer’s response. • Making inaccurate accusations against a fellow councillor over a bus-route decision made by Arriva. • Failing to cooperate with investigations and failing to attend his hearings. The former council officer said the incident contributed to her resignation after more than 25 years of service. Boam was publicly censured, required to apologise in writing and recommended for removal from two council committees. Yet his response to his followers? “They will try everything to attack me.” Joseph, accountability is not persecution. Scrutiny is not censorship. And a council standards panel that includes members of your OWN party is hardly evidence of a left-wing conspiracy. You hold public office. Public office comes with responsibilities. Stop playing the victim and start accepting accountability. Source: BBC News, 30 October 2026 aol.com/articles/councillor-…

Restore Britain: When political spin becomes a distortion of the truth. Restore Britain’s official, verified account proudly announces that “Scotland is ready for Restore Britain.” Their evidence? A poll they commissioned in which just 7.3% of Scottish respondents selected Rupert Lowe as their preferred Prime Minister. Let’s examine what they’re actually telling the public. 1. The overwhelming majority didn’t choose Lowe. 92.7% selected something other than Rupert Lowe. Andy Burnham received 24.3%, more than three times Lowe’s support. 2. Their supposed victory is statistically meaningless. Lowe’s 7.3% narrowly exceeds Badenoch’s 6.8%, Polanski’s 6.5% and Farage’s 6.3%. With approximately 1,000 respondents, differences this small do not establish a statistically reliable lead. 3. Almost half the responses are missing from their graphic. Their six displayed figures total 54.2%. That leaves 45.8% unaccounted for in the presentation. What did those respondents say? Without the complete tables, readers cannot properly assess the result. 4. They’re confusing personal preference with electoral support. Asking which politician someone would prefer as Prime Minister is not the same as asking which political party they intend to vote for. Independent Scottish Westminster polling actually placed Restore Britain at just 4% (Norstat) and 5% (More in Common). Source: pollcheck.co.uk/scottish-pol… 5. This raises a serious question about credibility. A political party is entitled to promote favourable polling. It is not entitled to expect its conclusions to go unquestioned. The headline figures may be genuine. The interpretation is misleading. And that matters. When an official political account takes a marginal result, strips away crucial context and presents it as evidence of sweeping public enthusiasm, it demonstrates a willingness to prioritise persuasion over an accurate understanding of the evidence. That does not, by itself, prove a deliberate lie. But it is a textbook example of political spin becoming a distortion of the truth. If Restore Britain wants the public to trust its claims, it should publish the complete weighted tables and explain how 7.3% support for one politician demonstrates that Scotland is ready for its party. Until then, this tells us considerably more about Restore Britain’s political messaging than it does about Scottish voters. Trust is earned through transparency, not manufactured triumph.

Own goal scored here by Conservative MP. 2.6 trillion debt when they were in government.

David, working-class people absolutely deserve justice. What they don’t deserve is having their struggles hijacked to manufacture a persecution narrative. Robinson admitted TEN breaches of a court injunction after losing a libel case. Connolly pleaded guilty to inciting racial hatred after calling for hotels housing asylum seekers to be burned. Tommo is on remand, having pleaded NOT GUILTY to criminal damage involving a boat with an emergency responder aboard. He is awaiting trial, not serving a sentence for that allegation. Not to mention other alleged issues surrounding his activities on the south coast. Kellie-Jay Keen’s dealings with the police raise a separate debate about free expression. You can question sentencing, bail decisions and police conduct. That’s entirely legitimate. But presenting four fundamentally different circumstances as proof that working-class people cannot get justice is intellectually dishonest. The working class is not a convenient excuse for ignoring the rule of law. Read the actual evidence: Robinson’s appeal judgment: bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ… Connolly’s appeal judgment: bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Cri… Tommo’s current proceedings: news.sky.com/story/anti-migr…

Lucy White has managed to get Britain’s ethnicity, religion and cultural history wrong in three paragraphs. Let’s examine the evidence. 1. “We have always been White.” False. African soldiers served in Roman Britain, including along Hadrian’s Wall. John Blanke, a Black trumpeter, served both Henry VII and Henry VIII. Neither Roman Britain nor Tudor England was exclusively White. Historic England: historicengland.org.uk/advic… National Archives: nationalarchives.gov.uk/expl… 2. “We have always been Christian.” Historically impossible. People in Britain practised religions long before Christianity arrived. Roman Britain had numerous religious traditions. Medieval England had established Jewish communities, until Edward I expelled them in 1290. English Heritage: english-heritage.org.uk/lear… National Archives: nationalarchives.gov.uk/educ… 3. “We have always been culturally homogeneous.” Britons. Romans. Angles. Saxons. Vikings. Normans. Britain’s languages, institutions, traditions and identities developed through centuries of migration, conquest and cultural exchange. Even England’s language is heavily influenced by Scandinavian and Norman French. English Heritage: english-heritage.org.uk/visi… 4. And what does modern Britain actually look like? According to the 2021 Census, England and Wales were: • 81.7% White. • 46.2% Christian. Neither figure is 100%. ONS ethnicity: ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationa… ONS religion: ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationa… And here’s the fundamental problem with your argument, Lucy. Being historically majority White is not the same as being exclusively White. Having a Christian heritage is not the same as having an exclusively Christian population. Having distinct national traditions is not evidence of cultural homogeneity. You’re confusing historical majorities with racial and religious ownership. You are perfectly entitled to celebrate Britain’s heritage. You are not entitled to rewrite its history without being challenged. Patriotism means understanding your country’s history, not erasing everyone who doesn’t fit your preferred version of it. The Union Jack belongs to British citizens of every race and religion. That’s Britain. Not the imaginary ethnically exclusive nation you’ve constructed.

As a British Army veteran, I find this deeply troubling. We served our country, not a political movement. Veterans deserve meaningful employment and support, not to be turned into the public face of a mass-deportation campaign. Military experience is valuable. It is not a substitute for civilian law, proper training or accountability. Patriotism means defending British values and the rule of law, not giving politicians an army of willing enforcers. We’ve seen this before somewhere?

Let’s put some numbers on this. The UK population is 69.5 million. One percent is approximately 695,000. If you’re talking about the foreign-born population, your proposal implies removing over 12 MILLION people, including British citizens. That’s not immigration enforcement. You’re describing mass population removal. And you’ve conveniently neglected to explain who qualifies as “them”.

When deporting people who have no legal right to remain is considered “woke”, the mask hasn’t just slipped. It’s fallen off a cliff. “We want millions gone.” Who exactly? Legal migrants? British citizens? Families who’ve lived here for decades? And who appointed you spokesman for “the British people”? This isn’t an immigration policy. It’s the language of mass expulsion dressed up as patriotism.

Imagine travelling to France to advocate mass deportations, only to discover that France also believes in controlling its borders. Suddenly, national sovereignty isn’t quite so appealing, is it? Please document any encounters with the French police. Unedited footage, preferably.

This isn’t speculation. It’s documented fact. Ryan Dinnage was charged with rape on 6 March 2025. Yet in April and May 2026, he was providing security for Nigel Farage, accompanying him on public campaign visits. He was convicted on 8 June and sentenced to 8½ years on 30 July. Reform UK admits he worked for them but claims an external contractor had vetted him. Vetted him for WHAT, exactly? A party that constantly lectures Britain about protecting women has some serious questions to answer. Who knew about the charge? When did they know? And how was he cleared to work around the public? Credit to Mukhtar for highlighting this. Sources: Thames Valley Police: thamesvalley.police.uk/news/… The Guardian: theguardian.com/politics/202…

Reform supporters gathering to be told who to hate today.

Jaime, Obama was born in Hawaii. His mother was born in Kansas. The Constitution requires a natural-born citizen, not two American-born parents. You’ve managed to misunderstand his birthplace, presidential eligibility AND the definition of treason in one post. That’s quite an achievement.

Jaime, we’ve gone from you misunderstanding the difference between a republic and a democracy to alleging that European “globalist operatives” infiltrated American politics. Obama was elected twice by American voters. That’s democracy, not infiltration. Criticising both parties is perfectly legitimate. Inventing conspiracies because you dislike the results isn’t. You’ve abandoned political argument in favour of conspiracy theories. Evidence, Jaime. Try some.

Jaime, the United States is both a constitutional republic AND a representative democracy. They’re not mutually exclusive. Nobody argued for pure democracy. You’ve invented that argument yourself. Now, for the third time, explain how “One God, One People, One Nation, One Party” fits with democratic pluralism. Particularly that last bit. ONE PARTY. Stop hiding behind constitutional terminology and address the actual question.

Legendary actor Sir Patrick Stewart, best known for his roles as Jean-Luc Picard in Star Trek and Professor X in X-Men, has died. He was 86.

🚨🇬🇧 The dumb-right keep saying Tommy was "just doin' to them, wot they done to him". But let me explain it to you stupids. It's not Tommy's job to hand out punishment for supposed wrongdoing, to teach people lessons, or settle scores. Tommy is not a gangland enforcer. He isn't Judge Dredd. He's not even the police. He's a civilian. Saying, "I'm not fretnin' ya or nuffin'", isn't a legal shield against being prosecuted when you launch a campaign of intimidation against someone. This is Tommy's M.O. Just ask @gingerrtom to play you the audio of Tommy threatening him like a rabid dog. Unfortunately for Tommy, he's a violent hothead with no impulse control who still thinks he's a top boy in a football firm. He was found guilty by a jury of his peers because normal people see his behaviour as thuggish, inappropriate, and illegal. It's that simple.

The GoFundMe Tommy Ten Names campaign will be next...then the obvious political prisoner haircut and beard. Feed Tommy's kids!