🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 1: THE PLAN 🚨 I am working on gathering all the documents. Now, here's something to understand about the "democracy" and protest ecosystem: almost nobody knows the 'grand plan' so to speak. They simply agree to play a role. For example, 99% of people breaking stuff on the streets believe they're doing it out of an organic uprising. They don't see that the police have been ordered to stand down. They don't see that legal services have already been arranged for them. They don't see that foundations are paying for their bonds. Similarly here, governors aren't participating in a pact to destroy the Constitution. Governors simply have agreed to push back on the Insurrection Act. The effect is the same: the governors end up playing a role in a grander plan. I call this "shared epistemology" in my book Unelected. Motivations differ, people rarely agree to the big evil supervillain framing, but incentives all converge in the same end goal. No Kings might not agree to explicitly tear down the Constitution, but they nonetheless work with DSA and will turn out millions of people if the right phone call is put in. Here is one articulation of the plan - and crucially, since then, they have put many NGOs in their places to execute their proper role at all levels when the time is right. Many more coming.
846
10,297
23,704
539,373
Another thing to understand: these are people who did regime change as a career before USAID was cut. And they were "successful" in many scenarios. These are the literal "CIA coup" people doing the plotting.

Oct 19, 2026 · 12:47 PM UTC

133
2,563
9,589
195,095
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @DataRepublican
Bureaucracies tend to be immortal. When the US built the bureaucracy to dismantle the USSR, no one imagined it would eventually run out of regimes to dismantle and turn on its host.
4
18
170
12,237
Yes. So the network exists. USAID was just their source of money. We must dismantle the network!
5
30
422
15,469
Replying to @DataRepublican
And remember that they are honest when they talk about “democracy.” They are rabid about the idea of America being the tyranny of the majority aka a democracy not a representative republic
1
69
4,377
Yes so USAID was an anti American pro communist money laundering scheme - just as we thought! No wonder the democrats went crazy!
3
17
258
6,791
Replying to @DataRepublican
The former USAID swamp creatures had been doing their thing for so long, that they don’t know anything else. They are unable to get regular jobs in the private sector. Hence, their current desperation.
3
25
409
12,741
Replying to @DataRepublican
I'm using this meme way too much...
3
5
77
4,239
Replying to @DataRepublican
USA vs France in Clandestine Intelligence Agency Levels
8
638
Replying to @DataRepublican
“Successful” in countries with average IQs of 73. 🤭
5
10
236
11,431
"Chatham House rules! Nobody record!" *somebody's AI records anyway and uploads to Google Drive* 😂
11
51
530
11,894
With seditious @ElissaSlotkin leading the charge.
6
12
181
4,413
Replying to @DataRepublican
You should help build a RICO case against them.
1
1
33
1,761
Replying to @DataRepublican
They recorded and stored all of their super secret meetings?! What ever happened to leaving a coded message in a newspaper on a park bench?
3
1
61
4,438
Posted this a couple of days ago and meant it. Danielle Reiff was involved in Uganda, a country with an average IQ of 73.
Replying to @politicalmath
The only consolation I have is that these Slotkin types way overestimate their own intelligence because they built their careers on overthrowing countries with an average IQ of 70
7
67
260
5,407
Replying to @DataRepublican
Singham needs to spend the rest of his days in a prison in Shanghai.
4
5
59
3,765
Replying to @DataRepublican
It all resolves back to the CIA
8
28
722
Replying to @DataRepublican
They look and feel a lot like former or current spooks who have too much free time because DOGE cut the funding for their international regime change projects.
2
3
56
2,756
Replying to @DataRepublican
Remembered this morning that Slotkin worked at the CIA first (same as Spanberger and so many others). Curious how many Dems are in the same boat as part of the institutionalist reorientation from abroad to the US that I just read about in Unelected too
1
5
46
2,805
Replying to @DataRepublican
So, clearly all of our agency heads need to know. @CIADirector @FBIDirectorKash @DNIPulte
2
11
59
2,731
Replying to @DataRepublican
1
5
12
1,496
Replying to @DataRepublican
The money got cut, not the people. Regime change was a career, and careers do not end when the client changes. They relocate.
1
14
1,137
Replying to @DataRepublican
Most of the insiders involved do this in part for the money raising... they then skim wildly off the top as exampled by the failed @KamalaHarris campaign blowing thru $2 Billion in just a few months with nothing to show for it... except a lot of richer staffers and so called consultants 🧐
1
11
487
Replying to @DataRepublican
I remember saying when USAID was being mothballed,"There are going to be a lot of disgruntled shitcanned deep staters with very specific skill sets, a lot of time on their hands, and nowhere to direct their energy. I hope they give them something constructive to occupy their time so they don't go doing sh*t like this...
6
229
Replying to @DataRepublican
Well, the advantage is that all of these people were employed byUSAID and there there is detailed information on all of them. Keep tabs on them and prosecute when laws are broken.
1
3
36
2,497
They’re nasty, smug, condescending social engineering dweeb-heads, who just think they’re the best thing since 4th Branch Mr Happy Sliced Bread.
20
1,870
Replying to @DataRepublican
The useful idiot
3
15
772
Replying to @DataRepublican
A lot of these people got exposed but never held accountable.
1
10
704
Replying to @DataRepublican
To be fair, this is pretty much how we got the original Constitution. The 13 colonies authorized their reps to make changes to the Articles of Confederation, not to write an entirely new document. Some states even considered prosecuting their own representatives for exceeding their authority. In the end, none of the states did that, but the Constitution was a technically illegal document. Articles of Confederation required UNANIMOUS consent to change it, while the Constitution just required nine out of 13 to ratify. This ratification requirement violated the existing Articles. Technically, colonies that did not ratify could have declared the colonies who adopted the Constitution to be in a state of rebellion against the Articles. They would have been correct. So, what the Democrats are doing is not unprecedented. But none of those Democrats are as savvy and well-intentioned as the Founders were. Whatever new government they come up with is going to completely suck rocks.
2
12
2,530
Replying to @DataRepublican
This regiment of blind and lawless recruits, advancing "anti-constitutional" and "extra-constitutional" campaigns, are walking directly into the trap Trump has devised to deliver the republic, modeled after Abraham Lincoln. Riots and terrorism >>> Insurrection Act >>> More riots and political violence >>> Martial law >>> Military tribunals >>> Accountability >>> Reconciliation nitter.siddz.com/fullylovedknown/status…
Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president, confronted an armed rebellion after Southern states seceded and formed the Confederacy in 1860–1861. His stated goal was to preserve the Union and maintain the Constitution and laws of the United States, which many historians describe as “saving” the American republic. Abraham Lincoln invoked authority under the Insurrection Act on April 15, 1861, in response to the Confederate attack on Fort Sumter and the secession of Southern states. His proclamation: A) Called for 75,000 state militiamen to suppress the rebellion and enforce federal law. B) Ordered those participating in the rebellion to disperse and return home within 20 days. C) Summoned Congress to an extraordinary session on July 4, 1861. He expanded the Army and Navy, ordered a naval blockade of Southern ports, and directed major campaigns aimed at defeating Confederate armies rather than merely holding territory. Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus in certain areas, authorized military arrests, and allowed military tribunals for civilians in zones of rebellion, arguing these steps were necessary to preserve the government. In his special message to Congress on July 4, 1861, he defended these emergency “war powers” as required to ensure that the government and Constitution did not “perish,” a rationale often summarized as using the war power to save the republic. The Union’s military victory under Lincoln’s leadership ended the Confederacy, preserved the territorial and constitutional continuity of the United States, and led to the abolition of slavery through the Emancipation Proclamation and the Thirteenth Amendment. Because the United States survived its greatest internal crisis with republican institutions ultimately intact, many scholars credit Lincoln’s wartime use of the military with having “saved the Union” and, by extension, the American republic.
2
4
15
2,007
Replying to @DataRepublican
Reiff wants consensus changes that ordinary elections cannot easily undo. Determining what counts as genuine national consensus is not neutral—who selects the participants, frames the questions, and synthesizes the output matters a great deal. Activist networks, NGOs, and foundations can heavily influence “deliberative” processes. The Zoom recording of Reiff in the March 2026 Democratic Constitution Forum discussion of contingency plans for a “crisis of legitimacy,” included mobilizing people to the streets if needed, alongside Luke Pickrell (tied to DSA’s Marxist Unity Group, which has long argued the current Constitution is undemocratic and should be replaced by a more majoritarian “democratic republic”). Reiff’s earlier USAID background in overseas democracy promotion, and her role co-founding DemocracyAID (workshops on noncooperation after USAID’s dismantling), add to the skepticism that these actors are simply neutral facilitators. Good to be Queen, eh? nitter.siddz.com/i/grok/share/c2hhcmQtM…
2
508
Replying to @DataRepublican
They use the spell or illusion of multiple voices nudging you always towards a path of your voice lost; the illusion of choice. Who to follow when you have jokers to the left and clowns on the right. Now we have Clowns and Jokers on the left in the guise the Rouge Intelligence Community, acting out Cosplay as planned. These people are stupid, central casting stupid.
625
Replying to @DataRepublican
I have no doubt these traitors are at work against the USA as well as in France and UK. This is what they do. They wrote the book. They belong in jail in many countries in the world. Their names and connections must be shared worldwide. There are plenty of non-corrupt prosecutors who can jail them,. That we are stuck with a USDoJ that is neither non-corrupt or willing to prosecute far left traitors, is no reason to discount foreign willingness.
1
1
115
Replying to @DataRepublican
Like the regime change HERE in the 2020 Selection. Note, it was not an election.
6
1,530
Replying to @DataRepublican
Its because the American people reject the globalist plan. It's why they hate us. These cockroaches work in the shadows to limit growth. The globalists need America to fail.
21
554
Replying to @DataRepublican
After 2014-18 uprisings by the Western Working Class… Brexit, French Yellow Vests, Bolsonaro, Taiwan, youth in Iran & Lebanon, Trump, etc. …the Global Elite unleashed hell on their peasants with rigged elections, virus+shutdowns, and importing low-IQ zombies as pawns.
1
11
443
Replying to @DataRepublican
I would like the CIA dissolved. They are counter productive to our Constitution. Radcliffe hasn’t said a word
1
7
185