Working hard is the biggest scam in human history

EXCLUSIVA | El consulado en México falsificó con típex decenas de expedientes de la ‘ley de nietos’. Una información de Teresa Gómez (@teresagomezgp). theobjective.com/espana/2026…

#Exclusiva. En la estructura de Renfe desembarcaron hace un año 6 perfiles de Más Madrid, IU, Equo y Compromís; y 7 del sector del autobús (Avanza, Alsa e Interbus). No tenían experiencia en el sector. Son los que toman las decisiones sobre la seguridad. abc.es/espana/puente-permiti…

Comunicado Oficial: fallecimiento de Jesús de Miguel. realmadrid.com/es-ES/noticia…

#INVESTIGACIÓN La juez Biedma aporta 652 mensajes de WhatsApp que acreditan que la cloaca actuaba coordinada con el PSOE para tumbar la causa del hermano de Sánchez. De todos ellos hay uno que destaca porque se afirma que la motivación de la red es «el Presiente». eldebate.com/espana/20261103…

🔴🔴 #ÚLTIMAHORA | La jueza Biedma aporta 652 mensajes de WhatsApp que acreditan que la cloaca actuaba coordinada con el PSOE para tumbar la causa del hermano de Sánchez ✍️ @entrammbasaguas eldebate.com/espana/20261103…

🔴 ÚLTIMA HORA | Dimite Óscar Puente por el accidente de Urda tras su comparecencia en el Congreso. theobjective.com/espana/poli…

Rotos de dolor, con un nudo en la garganta y sin poder creer que esto sea verdad, desde el CD Tenerife comunicamos el trágico fallecimiento, este martes, día 3 de noviembre de 2026, a las 8:00 horas, de Jesús de Miguel Alameda. No hay palabras de consuelo; no hay absolutamente nada que mitigue este sentimiento repleto de tristeza. Estamos junto a su desolada familia, junto a sus seres queridos, junto a todo el tinerfeñismo que hoy llora por este cruel desenlace. La familia de Jesús de Miguel agradece todas y cada una de las muestras de apoyo recibidas, e igualmente solicita, de corazón, máximo respeto a su privacidad, en estos terribles momentos. 🖤 DEP

Acaba de dimitir el Primer Ministro belga porque no ha llegado a un acuerdo para aprobar los presupuestos. LOL aquí tenemos a un pavo que lleva 3 años sin presentarlos siquiera y le chupa un huevo.

En Bélgica, el primer ministro dimite por no lograr aprobar los presupuestos.

Rapapolvo a los tertulianos de #lasextaxplica de Mario Samper, presidente de la Asoc. Víctimas de Adamuz: "Si esto vuelve a ser un gallinero, me levanto y me voy" Sobre la CIAF, AITAT, Adif y Óscar Puente: "Estos señores no tenían que estar dimitidos, hay que ponerlos en busca y captura" #urda #accidentetren

This is quite simply brilliant.

18 years ago today, Satoshi released the #Bitcoin whitepaper. What a legend! 🙌

The United Nations was established after World War II with a clear mandate: resolve international conflicts and prevent wars. Yet when major geopolitical flashpoints ignite, the UN is usually absent. This is not an operational oversight; it is a structural defect built directly into the Security Council veto. Because any permanent member or key ally can block resolutions, the UN’s core peacekeeping mandate remains eternally gridlocked when and where it matters most. Unable to fulfill its primary objective, the UN has turned inward to survive - a classic case of institutional mission creep. Today, it has morphed into one of the largest bureaucratic apparatuses in world history, absorbing $68 to $74 billion annually. This includes $5.1 to $5.4 billion for peacekeeping operations and $3.5 to $3.7 billion to maintain a workforce of up to 190,000 personnel. The UN also operates in isolation from ordinary economic reality. Under the 1946 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, its staff enjoy lifelong exemptions from national income taxes on their salaries. Meanwhile, the taxpayers funding this system face escalating tax burdens driven by UN-backed climate and economic policies. By transferring its focus away from war prevention, the UN has redirected its authority toward climate regulation and managing migration flows. Treaties like the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change operate unhindered by Security Council vetoes. This allows unelected officials to manage vast financial mechanisms - including carbon credit registries and the Green Climate Fund - with minimal accountability. In practice, these strict carbon emissions targets penalise Western industry while competitors like China and India expand heavy production under developing-nation exemptions. This is global wealth redistribution under the banner of environmental stewardship. A similar pattern governs the UN’s humanitarian aid for mainly illegal migrants. Initiatives like the Global Compact for Migration institutionalise and facilitate mass population flows, which erode national sovereignty. Unable to stop war, the UN’s survival now depends on fabricating fresh mandates. It has traded its original peacekeepers purpose for climate control and migration management. What's next?

The Club of Rome was founded in the late 1960s by a core of disenchanted scientists, rich industrialists and bureaucrats. They were the embryo of today's familiar climate activism aims, blaming unchecked population growth, industrial expansion and resource consumption for an impending collapse of civilisation within a century. Their 1972 report, The Limits to Growth, popularised the concept of finite planetary boundaries and the perceived necessity of global growth management. This same core ideology drives the supranational climate agenda today. In 1951, the UN incorporated the World Meteorological Organization, and in 1988 it created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. These twin agencies became the chief architects of an ongoing environmental crisis narrative. Both operate with explicit political mandates: providing governments with curated scientific rationale to justify top-down climate mandates. The underlying aim was always to frame human development - driven by energy use and population - as an existential threat. While IPCC assessment reports themselves were often selectively edited, UN leadership routinely amplified only the most radical, worst-case projections, distilling complex data into slogans of 'global boiling' or a 'code red for humanity'. The result has been a feedback loop of escalating rhetoric, artificial urgency and public hysteria - language not supported even by the underlying technical documents. Meanwhile, dissent was quietly neutralised; scientific careers were bypassed, funding diverted and academic tenure denied to those who questioned this orthodoxy. The core scientific claim relies on the premise that human emissions - roughly 3 to 4% of the total annual carbon flux - are overwhelming a naturally stable cycle. Yet Earth has experienced multiple sustained warm periods throughout the current Holocene interglacial; temperatures were 1 to 2°C warmer than today during the Holocene Climatic Optimum 8,000 to 5,000 years ago. The previous warm interglacial period, the Eemian, was 2°C warmer than today; African megafauna lived in the Thames Valley. CO₂ played no part. Furthermore, satellite observations confirm the planet has greened dramatically since the 1980s, expanding leaf-area index by an area equivalent to twice the continental United States - primarily driven by CO₂ fertilisation (NASA 2016, 2019; Zhu et al, Chen et al). While adding atmospheric CO₂ produces warming, it does so on a diminishing logarithmic scale. The critical debate, therefore, has never been basic physics, but rather the magnitude of warming, the balance of real-world harms, and whether the mandated policy remedies are worse than the disease. After four decades of warning and trillions of dollars in subsidies, wind and solar still supply only about 6% of global primary energy, while dense hydrocarbon fuels generate 82% (Statistical Review of World Energy 2024). Western economies have been rushed into rapid, capital-intensive energy transitions for which grid infrastructure was never designed, driving systemic price spikes and manufacturing off-shoring. Strategic dominance over supply chains has shifted, with China now manufacturing over 90% of the world’s solar panels and wind turbines. Meanwhile, annual COP summits have evolved into the world’s most extravagant traveling public relations circus - generating an estimated 100,000 tonnes of CO₂ at COP26 alone from fleets of private jets and five-star accommodations - to broker sweeping pledges that developing nations have little capacity or intention to fulfill. That the climate debate touches on legitimate environmental questions is to be expected. But the overarching policy response has been shaped from its genesis by the same impulse that birthed the Club of Rome: restrict energy use, limit economic growth, and dilute national sovereignty.

Rusia ha vetado la resolución de Estados Unidos que pretendía entregar el Sáhara a Marruecos. Ayer la decencia y la legalidad internacional llevó en la ONU los colores de Rusia

Pedro Sánchez @sanchezcastejon mintió a Bruselas: El Gobierno comunicó en mayo a Bruselas que había sustituido el sistema LZB que falló en el accidente articulo14.es/economia/el-go…

#INVESTIGACIÓN Puente suprimió el comité de expertos de accidentes ferroviarios mes y medio después de la tragedia de Adamuz. Estaba formado por un grupo de técnicos sin alineación política que eran considerados molestos por miembros del Gobierno. eldebate.com/economia/202610…

10 años atrás, si el ave llegaba tarde te devolvían el importe del billete. 9 años de socialismo y la recompensa es llegar vivo.