Host @NkanythingPod, Co-Founder @TomorrowTgthr, Founder of Narrowcast Media. | Was: @kamalaharris @Joebiden @WhiteHouse @Marshalls |

Paid to be here
It is truly very funny watching the “big-AI-Republican-consultant” industrial complex try to retreat to “no one cares about AI” as their talking point when they just tried to spend $100 million+ on the issue this cycle and stuff like the this keeps happening anyway
Sherrod Brown: Elon Musk Crowd: BOO!!! Sherrod: Peter Thiel Crowd: BOO!!!! Sherrod: Donald Trump Crowd: BOOOOOOO!!!!
1
4
30
3,549
Me: [giant acme anvil drops on my head and the cartoon rabbit I’ve been chasing escapes] yeah well no one even cared about this anyway
1
5
410
Circling back
Yes, AI is so irrelevant in Ohio that the NRSC begged the tech industry to spend money to bail out data center perceptions (which they did)
4
20
2,855
Yes, AI is so irrelevant in Ohio that the NRSC begged the tech industry to spend money to bail out data center perceptions (which they did)
Prime example of what @adamkovac talks about of bandwagon groups running ads on the #10 ranked issue in the hopes of stealing credit for a victory that had nothing to do with them. Literally the playbook The Groups™️ run every cycle.
1
5
16
4,615
I am heartened to see the Republicans settling on “nobody cares about AI” as their strategy, though. And I hope they stay there!
1
2
7
594
Rob Flaherty retweeted
First ad I've seen so explicitly targeting the obvious financial conflicts around the Trump administration's AI accelerationism
Tomorrow Together
10
51
315
39,023
Rob Flaherty retweeted
Scoop: Democratic AI PAC takes its fight to Senate Republicans, paints Husted and Marshall as beholden to data centers and "tech guys," & go after David Sacks semafor.com/article/10/23/20…
2
11
22
6,799
Well @TomorrowTgthr is going All-In on this election. We're even spending a bit on this fun one featuring Big AI's self-interested bestie David Sacks. (AI is a corruption story, and an affordability story, and a lack of control story, etc etc etc)
NEW AD: Meet @DavidSacks, Trump’s AI and crypto czar. Republicans like Jon Husted are letting him flood our communities with data centers and block AI regulation. Sacks gets rich. His friends get rich. Husted gets their money. The only person who loses… is you.
3
3
22
1,571
🚨 @TomorrowTgthr expands to Ohio-SEN and Kansas-SEN 🚨
NEW: We’re spending $2.5 million on TV and digital ads in two Senate races, building off our $4 million buy in House races: – Ohio – Kansas Big Tech got billions in tax breaks to build data centers on our land and drain our water — Jon Husted and Roger Marshall voted to give it to them.
1
2
16
1,403
Is the Democratic party's organizing apparatus stuck in 2008? @yasminradjy: "We talk to voters way too late, the conversations are way too transactional, and a lot of the limitations are because of opinionated technology."
2
8
31
3,803
Big techs’s talking points are out and they are “be more like AIPAC” and “please don’t be mean to tech”
There are two kinds of outside-group ad: 1. Help an organization's allies by advertising on the issues that that candidate has identified work well in their favor, or against their opponent (typically identified through a redbox). This is usually NOT an issue the org itself cares about; the point is that the candidate appreciates the ads because it's a message that their internal polling tells them works. This is the strategy employed by AIPAC, crypto pacs, Leading the Future, and lots of others. 2. An ad on the organization's pet issue (like this ⬇️), which hasn't been identified as a candidate's favored message. The goal of these ads is really for the org to piggyback on the candidate's expected victory by spinning after the election that the race hinged on their pet issue. But candidates don't really like this, and it benefits the org's spin more than it builds appreciation for the candidate. This strategy is being employed by AI safety PACs, who are generally more interested in elevating the perceived salience of their issue than in building political allies.
2
1
13
1,942
Does say something about the techs standing in the party that the best they can do is a tom cotton donor
1
1
2
472
Rob Flaherty retweeted
NEW national survey from @NavigatorSurvey on AI Two-thirds want more regulation of AI, only 12% want less — and that holds across parties (74% of Dems, 61% of Republicans, 56% of independents) and even among people who use it every week and like it.
1
21
28
8,815
Rob Flaherty retweeted
You can be cartoon villains or you can be bad at your job. Not sustainable to be both.
"Leading the Future’s own future appears in question." The great @kackleyZ reports on the AI-linked super PAC's seemingly dwindling presence pre-midterms news.bgov.com/bloomberg-gove…
1
3
755
Rob Flaherty retweeted
“@Rob_Flaherty warns that Democrats risk giving up ground if they fail to take big enough swings. Voters are ‘giving politicians a lot of leeway to take big swings and to really reimagine stuff,’ he says. If politicians only stick to basics like plans to retrain workers at community colleges, ‘I think we’re going to miss the bigness and the ingenuity that the moment calls for.’”
At a moment when voters are fearful of AI, Democrats are finding their footing. theverge.com/policy/1013113/…
1
5
740
please don't leave. we need you.
It may be time for me to step away from politics. I hope that enough Americans want to save our country. I hope that enough of us are going to vote this November.
4
8
63
9,370
What will @SamForstag do about AI safety if elected to Congress? FORSTAG: "I think that AI is the biggest existential threat we're facing as a country and as a species."
1
3
984
MAGA Infighting ERUPTS As Crunch Midterms Loom (Ft Sam Forstag) nitter.siddz.com/i/broadcasts/1qGvveQqA…
1
1
1,076
Why do so many Montanans hate Democrats, and how is @SamForstag changing that? FORSTAG: "I can truly emphasize with my friends and coworkers who had a sour look on their faces when I told them I was running as a Democrat."
1
1
2
945