I'm not sure if I missed it or not, but it feels like computer science never had the same sort of consultation across the academies. Did we just move too fast, or is this just fragmentation across our sub-disciplines?
The London Mathematical Society is currently surveying all editorial board members of all nine LMS journals (I am on the editorial board of two). This is part of a consultation on AI and publishing that will help determine changes to the LMS’s AI policy.
The survey has 36 questions and presents a range of positions on AI, including some fairly extreme ones—on issues such as how to treat papers predominantly drafted with the help of AI, or papers written by someone without expertise in the relevant research area, or how detailed AI declarations must be—and asks editorial board members to rate their agreement with each.
After the survey closes, there will be three online town halls for editorial board members to share and discuss their views on these issues.
I hope that, following the consultation, the LMS will adopt a sensible policy that is pro-AI and upholds Mertonian norms rather than the interests of a section of the mathematical community.