My personal take to the new board based on what we know now:
👍direct response to ABIM charging high fees, perceived double dipping, lack of accountability (tone deaf), overreach (choosing wisely and other irrelevant campaigns to mission of certification), changing rules constantly, and making too much profit;
👍new board is all cardiologists so they get what we do and what we need - you can talk to the new board members anytime you see them (which we will bc they are at our conferences);
👍it’ll be cheaper but prob only 20-30% less initially as it’s built on loans to start;
👍if approved ABIM will have to stop doing anything in cardiology and everything switches to ABCVM, as both are under ABMS. Thus new board also assures hospital privileges and ACGME requirements are met;
👍whatever you’re doing and whatever stage you’re at in ABIM will be automatically transferred over (so don’t stop);
👍as a direction, goal is to get everyone to maintain certification - cardiologists know you passed once and you should be helped to keep certification - no threats of decertification - we need our workforce to be out there as we’re already short staffed;
👍the ongoing part after initial cert will be built on making sure you’re licensed, filling any gaps in knowledge, and basic attestation to a quality program. Questions will automatically send you to the CME module that teaches what you got wrong. Do that and you’re done (and actually more competent - it will feel useful and relevant);
👍logistically easier as everything you do in cardiology is generally already known in cardiology - so should be already uploaded centrally;
👍the professional societies make up the board so if you don’t like direction you can lobby your own organization to change things and at least for SCAI you could vote the president based on any issue including this one;
👍it won’t be perfect initially but over time should get better and better and closer to what we want bc there is accountability as described;
👍governance by the societies means it shouldn’t spiral out of control into its own beast for profit, especially as the societies have equal input to the board. If there is eventual profit that should go into lowering fees IMO and I will certainly push for that;
👍getting all cardiology organizations to agree on this was not easy and reflects that there will be constant push and pull to make things better. No one society will be dominant;
👍there’s a financial firewall so the societies don’t make money from the new board. They do get money if you choose their modules to close knowledge gaps but you have choice on whose modules you use.
On balance it’s a no brainer. Please comment to move forward.
End/
Calling all
#cardiologists! Share your support for a new, independent
#CVBoard during the 90-day open comment period announced by ABMS. This is an important opportunity for cardiologists to engage in the application review and approval process and provide insights into the benefits for both clinicians and patients.
Learn more here 👉
CVBoard.org/get-involved/
All comments must be submitted electronically by July 24!
@ACCinTouch #ACCChapters