Strata 0.2.0 is now live in beta! It includes its own in-app harness and terminal-serving interface. github.com/Niko1221/Strata A lot of performance improvements and support for low-end devices 👇

Oct 19, 2026 · 1:53 PM UTC

126
234
1,215
125,861
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @coldniko
let's go!
1
2
1,116
Any feedback will be valuable!
3
1,025
Replying to @coldniko
Not sure if bug or what but strata engine has folder for models but Strata does not find any model..
1
3
945
It silently moves it - tomorrow update will fix it. Restart should resolve it
6
782
Replying to @coldniko
Niko my man I love you, you're a true revolutionist and I prefer what you've done and doing, but please consider focusing your time and energy towards engine improvements and not another opinionated harness - we have enough of those and they do not require your unique expertise.
1
5
752
That's the plan
2
704
Replying to @coldniko
1
1
299
Issue PR
1
267
Replying to @coldniko
1
1
770
Tune it once again, do a bigger tune option and see ;)
2
728
Replying to @coldniko
希望选择模型至少交代清楚tps根据机器来说速度预计tps是多少,不用准确,至少不应该下降如此之多我还浑然不知。
1
3
630
Good points! I like it
2
603
Replying to @coldniko
Minor UI bug on the screenshots attached (size of VRAM is different). Also if you tune a model, then unload it, change context, load it, the tune profile dissapears.
1
2
533
Thanks!
2
550
Replying to @coldniko
Congrats on Strata 0.2.0, Niko!
1
1
1,008
Thank you!
934
Replying to @coldniko
公式には0.2でサポートされていないのですが、この環境でbuildしてみました。AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / Radeon 8060S (gfx1151)。0.1.45と変化はないですが、独自に取り込んでいたPRが標準で適用されています。
1
2
218
Today more :)
184
Replying to @coldniko
😢
1
922
Tomorrow!
1
8
857
Replying to @coldniko
What’s the point of yet another harness? TLDR; Not criticism, just asking - if it’s for convenience for starters or testing, or it give some other benefits?
1
1
902
For starters, you can use TUI with anything you want and its lightweigt
1
2
879
Replying to @coldniko
For people who already has strata set-up from git-cloned source, is it possible or planned to make the desktop/cli reuse it?
1
1
745
No, I had to redo the way codebase is structured. There won't be such massive changes anymore to the structure itself. Only performance + models + improvements on existing.
2
688
Replying to @coldniko
did you jumed from omp to this harness?
1
1
845
Yep
1
3
766
Replying to @coldniko
what is the issue with the R9700 MTP decode? how to mitigate as a R9700 owner?
1
1,100
What issue do you have?
678