We build AI agents that learn how a business operates, then automate the work. Backed by @Sequoia, @8VC, and @A_StarVC.

New York / London
Edra retweeted
@stevesi is exactly right: most people can't flowchart their own job. Don't ask them to. The business logic is in the work itself: resolved tickets, decisions, conversations. Every business needs a system that can learn from that continuously, write it down and then let an expert review and correct it.
Steven Sinofsky on why it's so hard to diffuse AI into companies: most work runs on know-how that's hard to turn into step-by-step instructions for an agent. "Algorithmic thinking is really, really, really hard for the vast majority of people who have jobs." "If you were to go to any person and ask them to create a flow chart for a particular thing that they have to go do, they would probably fail at producing that flow chart." "Say doing a marketing plan and there's 50 marketing people working on a giant product line. One person probably understands and could document the flow chart." "So if you put one of these agents in front of people to create these things, their ability to explain to it what to do is really, really limited." "You're basically just developing the next abstraction layer for how people interact. And developing an abstraction layer has historically, at each level of the abstraction layer, been a highly skilled, very specific individual within an organization." @stevesi
3
25
656
Edra retweeted
Replying to @chamath
True for software. Also true for every other function in the enterprise. The fix isn't choosing between individual speed and team knowledge. We're building a learning system that synthesizes reasoning from people doing their actual work, in the systems they already use. Humans get faster. Agents get the context they need to be useful.
1
2
1,187
Edra retweeted
Replying to @Yuchenj_UW
Most memory layers work just by dumping facts on what happened. The better way functions less like a database and more like a prediction engine - what's worth remembering is what's useful to accomplish a task in the future.
1
1
857
Every large company is running on a document that was never written, maintained by someone who is about to stop maintaining it. Joining @edra_ai .
4
3
27
3,442
Edra retweeted
Enterprise context is the new source code. The instructions you give your agents about how your business actually runs are your IP. That's why you need to own that context in a white box system you can read, modify, and govern. Not black box models or proprietary vendor configurations.
4
6
33
4,333
Edra retweeted
The jump from personal research wiki to enterprise operations is where it gets brutal. Thousands of employees, millions of records, tribal knowledge that contradicts itself across teams. Indeed, there is room for a new product and we’re building it in the enterprise. Agentic learning that doesn’t just compile, it reverse-engineers the institutional logic from existing systems. It is the library of executable knowledge agents need, and employees contribute to. Same core loop described here: ingest, compile, lint, enhance - but at organizational scale. The knowledge layer for AI agents is the next great system of record.
LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.
18
10
155
23,533
Edra retweeted
Replying to @karpathy
The jump from personal research wiki to enterprise operations is where it gets brutal. One person’s markdown repo is manageable. Thousands of employees, millions of tickets, tribal knowledge that contradicts itself across teams, you can’t vibe-code that. We’re building this for enterprise ops at @edra_ai . Agentic learning that reverse-engineers executable knowledge from existing systems (tickets, logs, emails), outputs a white-box knowledge library, and keeps it current as the business changes. Same core loop you’re describing, ingest, compile, lint, enhance - but at organizational scale. The instinct that “there is room here for an incredible new product” is right. The knowledge layer for AI agents is the next great system of record. Live today with the likes of HubSpot, ASOS, Cushman & Wakefield.
4
23
13,365
We're launching Edra out of stealth, backed by $30M led by @sequoia , @8vc , and @A_StarVC . We build AI agents that learn how a business operates, then automate the work. And we're hiring in NY and London: edra.ai/careers
We’re out of stealth. Today, we’re also announcing our Series A led by @sequoia , @8vc , and @A_StarVC , bringing our total funding to $30M+. Every enterprise needs to teach their AI how to do work. We build agents that reverse engineer enterprise processes, then run them. Read about the future of learning in the enterprise: nitter.siddz.com/edra_ai/status/2034268…
7
2
50
15,509