Reflections on the Pure Science.

Replying to @jordanbpeterson
The options have been laid out for us: The annihilation of anarchy. The prison of communism. The call to adventure. You haven't heard the call? But, you have been listening to him.
1
Replying to @BishopBarron
Reflect back to Caesar his image of himself insofar as you must, but don't believe he's a god. That is the lesson in regard to our attitude toward the secular world.
1
Mathematician: "What has the philosopher done to resist invading armies?" Philosopher: "What has the mathematician done to resist becoming one?" Mathematician: "I would rather be one over the other." Philosopher: "Is there another way?"
Replying to @Math_files
Now where are mathematicians going to get the feeling of power?
1
2
Replying to @jordanbpeterson
I think I'm beginning to understand Jordan Peterson. The story of Abraham is a comedy. The story of Jesus is a tragedy.
1
Replying to @Math_files
Terence, what you're experiencing is the realization of the essence of math—the work of a machine. Factory workers have been experiencing this for decades.
2
Replying to @BishopBarron
What did Freud say? After the murder of the Father, they erected a totem to lord over them?
Replying to @BishopBarron
But value is posited by us; this is what value is, the order of rank we posit. "Objective value" is an oxymoron. The "transcendent third" must come from above, but the self-regarding are not looking up. Our problem in a nutshell.
Replying to @visegrad24
Mathematicians thought they were contemplating the mind of God. Turns out, they are thinking like a machine.
5
Replying to @visegrad24
Looks like the fleecing of the public has reached its limit. Is it time to return the wealth? Not according to the ancient playbook.
Replying to @jordanbpeterson
Nietzsche didn't want to create values. He wanted philosophers to prepare the way for the creator of values. For him, "aiming" is not an "aiming up." It's an "aiming over."
2
Replying to @BishopBarron
If you're captivated by an object, and you have a restful heart, you are not "honest seekers." Strong words.
Replying to @BishopBarron
Nice sermon. Thank you. But isn't the root of all evil the finding of the truth, the good, and the beautiful in too narrow a place, in small things?
1
We define the universe as that which does not contain self-referential things. The universe itself does not contain itself. Therefore, it contains itself.
2
Replying to @Math_files
So, the universe is not a container?
Replying to @jordanbpeterson
Dawkins is a "cultural Christian" because he would rather be served by a Christian. Selfish gene indeed.
The self-destruction of revenge (self-identity) is repelled into punishment (inverse world). The inverse of the inverse world (self-attraction) is the law of the community. Self-repelling and self-attracting is how the object of consciousness moves. teddit.net/r/hegel/s/xk0Ecom…
Replying to @BishopBarron
So, there's an emptiness, a tearing apart, and a fullness. That sounds like dinner. Ancient text indeed.