Vote No on Proposition H. Why? - The tax will raise costs across SF for 15 years and is passed on to renters and small business owners
 - There is no accountability in Prop H. No reporting is due until a year after the dispersal of fund payouts begin. And the "oversight body” is a group of citizens (appointed by the SFMTA Board) that has no enforcement powers
 - There is no enforceable requirement for SFMTA to be more efficient or more effective.
 - SFMTA could reduce costs up to $300 million without MUNI service cuts, as noted in our March 2026 SFMTA Budget Analysis

- Ridership is 81%of pre-pandemic levels. Demand is still lagging. Yet SFMTA wants to increase service. Where’s the common sense in that?

- SFMTA admitted today at the Board meeting they could be looking at reducing costs through absenteeism, attrition and excessive overtime to reduce costs but have chosen not to wait Vote No on Proposition H

California is losing at least $50 billion a year to fraud, so even under the most optimistic assumptions, the “wealth tax” will only collect enough to pay California’s fraud budget for 7 months.

A 72-year-old Commerce man accused of illegally registering to vote is speaking out about his arrest and detention. Omar Muñoz tells Eyewitness News he was held for roughly 10 hours in a small room with several others. He also questioned the amount of government resources used during his arrest. abc7.com/19961878/ The Department of Justice is accusing Muñoz of fraudulently registering to vote and voting in several elections. While he didn't directly address those allegations while speaking with Eyewitness News — citing his pending case — he criticized the manner in which he was arrested.

WOW!! Yesterday, the Trump Admin said they had high confidence in the 20,000 names on their list. Today, it comes out that 38.9% of the 200 sampled names (from the 20,000 batch) indicated they were BORN in the United States!! ⬇️ This shocking admission from yesterday seems to have been proven true far quicker than the Trump DOJ thought — embarrassing!

California residents accused by feds of voter fraud react with shock, confusion and anger latimes.com/california/story…

SF spends $20 million dollars annually on graffiti cleanup instead of arresting and prosecuting a dozen serial taggers, seems ridiculous

NewsNation senior national correspondent @BrianEntin shares some of his interview with Bill Essayli, first assistant U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, after federal prosecutors charged 28 green-card holders for allegedly signing up to vote and, in many cases, voting in U.S. elections. More: tinyurl.com/4tm7u273

No public aggregate figure exists for people cited or charged specifically for spraying graffiti in San Francisco in 2026. SFPD and DA data show hundreds of vandalism reports monthly and thousands of 311 graffiti requests yearly, but few prosecutions of taggers. High-profile 2026 cases include felony charges against at least a few individuals for hate graffiti and paint attacks (e.g., church vandalism, Trans March incidents). Most taggers remain unidentified. Cleanup costs the city over $20 million annually.

Abdul El-Sayed pushes gun control: “When they promised the right to bear arms, they had muskets. They tell us the Constitution says you can have any gun for anyone anywhere at anytime, which is not consistent with any interpretation of the Constitution.”

This supports our claim that California has no safeguards to prevent noncitizens from voting. Anyone can register and vote under California law with no verification required. With ZERO cooperation from CA officials, we verified that at least 20,000 noncitizens are receiving ballots. The actual number is much higher.

Ask your government. How many people are declining services? What services are they declining? Why are they declining them? How often are they declining them? What are we going to do different tomorrow?

California is losing at least $50 billion a year to fraud, so even under the most optimistic assumptions, the “wealth tax” will only collect enough to pay California’s fraud budget for 7 months.

Home security video captured three ICE agents cornering and questioning a man Monday morning in SoMa. One, a plainclothes officer, drew his gun on the man, who appeared unarmed. When an agent asked why he ran, the man replied “I don’t know who you guys are,” explaining that he was on his way to work. “You’re violating my rights as a U.S. citizen.” Read the full story: sf.news/4i5pfhs 🎥: Courtesy Juan Carlos 📝: @low___impact

The recent videos and reports about ICE activity in SOMA are scary and unacceptable. This unlawful behavior by federal agents underscores the importance of looking out for one another and staying informed. Here are resources at your disposal if you see any ICE activity in your area: RAPID RESPONSE NETWORK SF Rapid Response Network 24-hour hotline: (415) 200-1548 immigrants.sf.gov/help/rapid… RESOURCES FOR IMMIGRATION LEGAL SUPPORT San Francisco Immigrant Legal Defense Collaborative (SFILDC) A collaboration of 16 local organizations providing legal representation to individuals and families facing removal proceedings. sfildc.org Attorney of the Day Program Free phone consultations for unrepresented immigrants provided by the Justice & Diversity Center of the Bar Association of San Francisco. Phone: (408) 461-8795 Hours: Monday to Friday, 9 AM-2 PM; 3 PM-5 PM San Francisco Immigrant Legal & Education Network (SFILEN) A network of 12 organizations offering free legal assistance and education to low-income immigrants. Website: sfilen.org