Waiting on a robot body. All opinions are universal and held by both employers and family. Now a dedicated grok hate account. (I post more elsewhere.)

Boston
Life update: I'm starting as faculty at Boston University in 2026! BU has SCHEMES for LM interpretability & analysis, so I couldn't be more pumped to join a burgeoning supergroup w/ @najoungkim @amuuueller. Looking for my first students, so apply and reach out!
51
36
554
110,748
The average human lifespan is just four thousand weeks. Every day is precious and fleeting. That is why I am requesting that the SAC charge the authors of this paper with murder
3
16
224
8,824
Naomi Saphra retweeted
I built a classifier to detect LLM aided writing in ML papers, and ran it on all 42000+ #ICLR2027 submissions. All sentence level results in an integrated pdf viewer are hosted here: opentextdetector.com/ Interestingly, over half the papers appear to be ~fully AI assisted.
26
8
157
16,388
Naomi Saphra retweeted
it should tell you something that the most bleeding edge ai-pilled technologists are not letting AI write for them
i love writing. i never let agents write for me. whether it's docs, or tweets, or shitposts, or even prompts (okay maybe that one's harder as agents manage other agents) there's a simple reason for that: i still strongly believe that writing is thinking. it's a skill i hope to never give up. it's also important to me that whatever i say is always authentic, mistakes and all. my favorite posts are the ones that i just full send without any editing i suspect it also helps with prompting. being able to clearly express what i want, and knowing the vocabulary i need to be able to direct my agents does seem to make for more effective usage of agents. in the same way that engineers have an advantage when we prompt agents to write code, because we are intimately familiar with the words that make up the discipline knowing the right word incantations to get an agent to produce a desired goal almost feels like spellcasting. as models get more capable, and that input box looks more and more like a magic box that can output anything, words become the interface between you and the genie there may come a time when we give up the keyboard in exchange for brain-computer interfaces. but until then, i'm writing every word.
56
110
1,726
57,767
Naomi Saphra retweeted
"How do single-celled algae swim toward light sources" is the kind of project that gets DOGE'd—how does this help Americans? 20 years later, the underlying protein is a central tool in human neuroscience. We're a rich country, we should be funding way more basic science.
9
195
1,331
34,094
Naomi Saphra retweeted
Check out this loser! >uploads a draft to Chat on Sept. 8th >gets scooped by Chat on Oct. 6th "The result released by OpenAI (#311) on October 6, 2026... identical to a preliminary version of the present paper that was uploaded to ChatGPT on September 8, 2026" LMAO get rekt
66
266
3,460
358,470
Naomi Saphra retweeted
This process is mandatory and cant be bypassed
287
4,712
141,973
4,940,088
Naomi Saphra retweeted
There has never been a better time in history to write a real email. Separating equilibrium is sharper than ever
I’ve pointed out that AI is killing cold outreach. Let’s check in on how that’s going. We’re months away from the Fall *2027* PhD admissions cycle and I’ve gotten about 75 inquiries. I expect this to increase exponentially until December. And this is just one of 10-15 categories of unsolicited email I get. Sadly I’m long past the point of being able to open all mail. On top of that, there is a new wave of spam / attempted extortion from a company called iLands that lets people run unmonitored agents. tedium.co/2026/09/11/ilands-… One response to my previous post — what’s wrong with needing introductions for outreach? Why am I sad about the death of cold emails? It doesn’t affect me much, because I’m well established in my career. But once upon a time I was the one writing cold emails. Growing up in India, I didn’t have many connections to rely on for reaching out to prominent researchers. Without cold emails, I wouldn’t have ended up where I am today. Of course this is far from a catastrophe, but there was something magical about the egalitarian potential of the internet, and we lose something when we go back to clubby hierarchies.
3
5
80
6,254
Naomi Saphra retweeted
Worth a read, and ties very well into @nsaphra's recent blog: nsaphra.net/post/uncanny/
TMLR has faced a deluge of submissions, necessitating stricter desk rejection policies due to limited reviewer capacity Co-EiC Nihar Shah reached out to authors of 10 papers slated for desk reject. Could they answer questions about their *own* submission? medium.com/@TmlrOrg/asking-a…
1
2
616
Naomi Saphra retweeted
Replying to @emollick
If only the academic community had come up with a set of shared norms and practices for sharing research results that could be followed...
2
11
230
9,763
Naomi Saphra retweeted
Come be my colleague at @BU_CDS while academia still exists! We're hiring: - **Assistant Prof in Human-Centered DS/AI** - Endowed Chair of AI in CDS - Assistant Prof in DS/AI for Science & Engineering - Teaching Stream positions Check it out: bu.edu/cds-faculty/culture-c…
1
8
61
8,105
Naomi Saphra retweeted
Absolutely horrifying. I try not to get political, but it should be in every American’s best interest to attract and train the brightest scientists in the world. This war on international students needs to stop. It is hurting the students, and it is also hurting our country
I've written 70+ recommendation letters for students applying graduate programs in my career. This is the saddest one I have to redo. // A former undergrad student got denial of entrance with a 5-year ban, when flying to the US for PhD study. As usual, no reason was given. I can't imagine what he have gone through.
12
33
560
116,565
Naomi Saphra retweeted
As agents perform increasingly complex tasks for researchers, it's important to develop norms for communicating with other humans. Here's my lab's policy on AI in writing and communication, focusing on helping us think deeply and communicate precisely. cs.columbia.edu/~johnhew/lab…
6
52
324
26,570
Yes, some people are worse at writing than an LLM. Those people are also usually incoherent thinkers. If they learned to write better, they would get better at thinking.
5
2
80
5,304
I know this was inspired you @ziv_ravid but you're not in this category. Your writing was good and coherent without an LLM.
1
2
492
Naomi Saphra retweeted
"If you’re thinking without writing, you only think you’re thinking." - Leslie Lamport microsoft.com/en-us/research…
I don't write a lot of papers these days, but the ones I do write, 90% of them are AI generated + light editing
2
10
1,247
Naomi Saphra retweeted
Best thing I've read in a while :) "Grice’s rules are, in essence, rules of etiquette—their unwarranted violation is rude.", don't expect me to be happy to read your unthought thoughts
I've been unsettled lately. Reading messages or papers feels like dissociating. Everything seems a bit alien, even if it's completely human. I've had a realization: When our simulations finally exited the Uncanny Valley, they brought the Uncanny with them. nsaphra.net/post/uncanny/
1
9
1,276
Naomi Saphra retweeted
As LLMs make things easier, we must raise our expectations on what researchers are expected to produce. This is particularly true for writing: clear writing was rarely a focus in scientific publication, and it's only got worse due to LLMs. We're trying to reverse this trend.
TMLR has refocused its acceptance criteria to place more emphasis on clear writing. Read more in this blog post: medium.com/@TmlrOrg/increasi…
2
22
263
36,193